检测蒂鲁帕蒂三级护理医院金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株对甲氧西林的耐药性

Vineela Kodi, Jayaprada Rangineni, Yamini Sharabu
{"title":"检测蒂鲁帕蒂三级护理医院金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株对甲氧西林的耐药性","authors":"Vineela Kodi, Jayaprada Rangineni, Yamini Sharabu","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in various clinical samples received at tertiary care hospital. Initially, the Staphylococcus aureus and its antibiotic susceptibility tests is performed in clinical samples which are submitted to the department of Microbiology. And Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) is determined by using cefoxitin (30 μg) as per CLSI guidelines. \nMethods: The prospective study was conducted in department of Microbiology in a tertiary care hospital. All Staphylococcus aureus organisms isolated in clinical samples were included in the study and processed as per the standard operating procedure. Methicillin susceptibility was tested by using cefoxitin (30μg) disks on Muller-Hinton agar plates that were inoculated with a suspension (equal to 0.5 McFarland standards) of the s. aureus. \nResults: In our study, amongst hundred staphylococcus aureus isolates, sixty isolates were shown resistance to cefoxitin (30µg), which indicates that percentage of methicillin-resistant s. aureus in our study is 60. Majority of s. aureus were isolated from blood samples 44% (n= 44) followed by pus samples 32% (n=32). Linezolid resistance reported was 3%. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and daptomycin by disc diffusion test as per CLSI guidelines 2021. \nConclusion: To conclude, MRSA plays a significant role and it can be transmitted through endogenous, cross-infection and reinfections. Phenotypic methods like use of cefoxitin disc (30µg) can be considered for detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus, as it consumes less time and easy to perform.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DETECTION OF METHICILLIN RESISTANCE IN CLINICAL ISOLATES OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, TIRUPATI\",\"authors\":\"Vineela Kodi, Jayaprada Rangineni, Yamini Sharabu\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in various clinical samples received at tertiary care hospital. Initially, the Staphylococcus aureus and its antibiotic susceptibility tests is performed in clinical samples which are submitted to the department of Microbiology. And Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) is determined by using cefoxitin (30 μg) as per CLSI guidelines. \\nMethods: The prospective study was conducted in department of Microbiology in a tertiary care hospital. All Staphylococcus aureus organisms isolated in clinical samples were included in the study and processed as per the standard operating procedure. Methicillin susceptibility was tested by using cefoxitin (30μg) disks on Muller-Hinton agar plates that were inoculated with a suspension (equal to 0.5 McFarland standards) of the s. aureus. \\nResults: In our study, amongst hundred staphylococcus aureus isolates, sixty isolates were shown resistance to cefoxitin (30µg), which indicates that percentage of methicillin-resistant s. aureus in our study is 60. Majority of s. aureus were isolated from blood samples 44% (n= 44) followed by pus samples 32% (n=32). Linezolid resistance reported was 3%. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and daptomycin by disc diffusion test as per CLSI guidelines 2021. \\nConclusion: To conclude, MRSA plays a significant role and it can be transmitted through endogenous, cross-infection and reinfections. Phenotypic methods like use of cefoxitin disc (30µg) can be considered for detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus, as it consumes less time and easy to perform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在估算三级医院接收的各种临床样本中金黄色葡萄球菌对甲氧西林耐药的流行率。首先,对提交给微生物学部门的临床样本进行金黄色葡萄球菌及其抗生素敏感性检测。根据 CLSI 指南,使用头孢西丁(30 μg)测定耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。研究方法这项前瞻性研究在一家三级医院的微生物科进行。临床样本中分离出的所有金黄色葡萄球菌均被纳入研究范围,并按照标准操作程序进行处理。在接种了金黄色葡萄球菌悬浮液(相当于 0.5 McFarland 标准)的 Muller-Hinton 琼脂平板上使用头孢西丁(30μg)盘检测甲氧西林敏感性。研究结果在我们的研究中,100 个金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中有 60 个对头孢西丁(30µg)产生耐药性,这表明耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在我们的研究中占 60%。大部分金黄色葡萄球菌是从血液样本中分离出来的,占 44%(n=44),其次是脓液样本,占 32%(n=32)。据报告,利奈唑胺的耐药性为 3%。根据 2021 年 CLSI 指南,通过圆盘扩散试验,所有分离菌株均对万古霉素和达托霉素敏感。结论总之,MRSA的作用很大,它可以通过内源性感染、交叉感染和再感染传播。在检测金黄色葡萄球菌对甲氧西林的耐药性时,可考虑使用表型方法,如使用头孢西丁圆片(30µg),因为这种方法耗时少、操作简便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DETECTION OF METHICILLIN RESISTANCE IN CLINICAL ISOLATES OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, TIRUPATI
Objective: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in various clinical samples received at tertiary care hospital. Initially, the Staphylococcus aureus and its antibiotic susceptibility tests is performed in clinical samples which are submitted to the department of Microbiology. And Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) is determined by using cefoxitin (30 μg) as per CLSI guidelines. Methods: The prospective study was conducted in department of Microbiology in a tertiary care hospital. All Staphylococcus aureus organisms isolated in clinical samples were included in the study and processed as per the standard operating procedure. Methicillin susceptibility was tested by using cefoxitin (30μg) disks on Muller-Hinton agar plates that were inoculated with a suspension (equal to 0.5 McFarland standards) of the s. aureus. Results: In our study, amongst hundred staphylococcus aureus isolates, sixty isolates were shown resistance to cefoxitin (30µg), which indicates that percentage of methicillin-resistant s. aureus in our study is 60. Majority of s. aureus were isolated from blood samples 44% (n= 44) followed by pus samples 32% (n=32). Linezolid resistance reported was 3%. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and daptomycin by disc diffusion test as per CLSI guidelines 2021. Conclusion: To conclude, MRSA plays a significant role and it can be transmitted through endogenous, cross-infection and reinfections. Phenotypic methods like use of cefoxitin disc (30µg) can be considered for detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus, as it consumes less time and easy to perform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信