墨西哥选举司法模式的宪法解释方法

José Ramón Narváez Hernández, Jesús Ángel Cadena Alcalá
{"title":"墨西哥选举司法模式的宪法解释方法","authors":"José Ramón Narváez Hernández, Jesús Ángel Cadena Alcalá","doi":"10.18046/prec.v24.6486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to analyze in perspective how constitutional interpretation influences electoral justice and the protection of fundamental rights of a political-electoral nature. A methodology is proposed for the correct and efficient use of constitutional and conventional interpretation by jurisdictional operators, with special emphasis on the analysis of the obstacles or technical barriers they face when carrying out constitutional-conventional regularity examinations. The conclusion was obtained that in electoral judicial practice there are many problems when maximizing or optimizing rights, so constitutional interpretation must be based on a consistent and credible examination of judicial argumentation and hermeneutics to enhance political-electoral rights and democratic principles in the framework of the democratic rule of law.","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metodología para la interpretación constitucional desde el modelo de la justicia electoral mexicana\",\"authors\":\"José Ramón Narváez Hernández, Jesús Ángel Cadena Alcalá\",\"doi\":\"10.18046/prec.v24.6486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article aims to analyze in perspective how constitutional interpretation influences electoral justice and the protection of fundamental rights of a political-electoral nature. A methodology is proposed for the correct and efficient use of constitutional and conventional interpretation by jurisdictional operators, with special emphasis on the analysis of the obstacles or technical barriers they face when carrying out constitutional-conventional regularity examinations. The conclusion was obtained that in electoral judicial practice there are many problems when maximizing or optimizing rights, so constitutional interpretation must be based on a consistent and credible examination of judicial argumentation and hermeneutics to enhance political-electoral rights and democratic principles in the framework of the democratic rule of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precedente Revista Jurídica\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precedente Revista Jurídica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v24.6486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v24.6486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章旨在透彻分析宪法解释如何影响选举公正和政治选举性质的基本权利保护。文章提出了一种方法,以便司法操作者正确有效地使用宪法和常规解释,并特别强调分析他们在进行宪法-常规规范性审查时所面临的障碍或技术壁垒。得出的结论是,在选举司法实践中,权利最大化或最优化时存在许多问题,因此宪法解释必须以司法论证和诠释学的一致性和可信性审查为基础,以加强民主法治框架内的政治选举权利和民主原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metodología para la interpretación constitucional desde el modelo de la justicia electoral mexicana
The article aims to analyze in perspective how constitutional interpretation influences electoral justice and the protection of fundamental rights of a political-electoral nature. A methodology is proposed for the correct and efficient use of constitutional and conventional interpretation by jurisdictional operators, with special emphasis on the analysis of the obstacles or technical barriers they face when carrying out constitutional-conventional regularity examinations. The conclusion was obtained that in electoral judicial practice there are many problems when maximizing or optimizing rights, so constitutional interpretation must be based on a consistent and credible examination of judicial argumentation and hermeneutics to enhance political-electoral rights and democratic principles in the framework of the democratic rule of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信