英语水平有限患者的产前决策:涉及哪些因素?

Natalie Schelbar, Olivia Pruss, Maria Alonso-Luaces, Faith Butler
{"title":"英语水平有限患者的产前决策:涉及哪些因素?","authors":"Natalie Schelbar, Olivia Pruss, Maria Alonso-Luaces, Faith Butler","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol17.21375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. A comprehensive definition of culture encompasses shared norms, beliefs, expectations, language, and customs, all of which are crucial considerations when working with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). In this study, the authors examined how language, external influences, and patient-provider relational factors associated with decisional conflict in prenatal care patients.      \nMethods. The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to assess decisional conflict related to postpartum contraception, elective induction, and newborn feeding methods. The survey included questions about demographics, communication methods, external influences, and provider trust, and was distributed to prenatal care patients who spoke either English or Spanish. Data analysis involved using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses.  \nResults. Out of the 23 respondents, 12 were Spanish-speaking and 11 were English-speaking. Spanish-speaking participants were less likely to have health insurance compared to English-speaking participants (χ2(1, N = 23) = 3.67, p = 0.016). There was no statistically significant difference in decisional conflict between English- and Spanish-speaking participants. Religion affected 11 of 23 participants' decisions, while partner expectations influenced 10 of 23 participants. Working with an interpreter and the quality of interpretation were crucial for Spanish-speaking individuals. Most participants (59%) felt that the provider's understanding of the patient’s cultural background was important for decision-making.  \nConclusions. While there was no association between language discordance and decisional conflict, several factors influencing prenatal decision-making were identified. The use and quality of interpretation significantly affected decision-making and should be prioritized for patients with LEP. Religion and partner expectations were found to be highly influential in decision-making. Respondents also emphasized the importance of the provider's understanding of the patient’s cultural background.","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"10 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prenatal Decision-Making in Patients with Limited English Proficiency: What Factors are Involved?\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Schelbar, Olivia Pruss, Maria Alonso-Luaces, Faith Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/kjm.vol17.21375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. A comprehensive definition of culture encompasses shared norms, beliefs, expectations, language, and customs, all of which are crucial considerations when working with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). In this study, the authors examined how language, external influences, and patient-provider relational factors associated with decisional conflict in prenatal care patients.      \\nMethods. The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to assess decisional conflict related to postpartum contraception, elective induction, and newborn feeding methods. The survey included questions about demographics, communication methods, external influences, and provider trust, and was distributed to prenatal care patients who spoke either English or Spanish. Data analysis involved using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses.  \\nResults. Out of the 23 respondents, 12 were Spanish-speaking and 11 were English-speaking. Spanish-speaking participants were less likely to have health insurance compared to English-speaking participants (χ2(1, N = 23) = 3.67, p = 0.016). There was no statistically significant difference in decisional conflict between English- and Spanish-speaking participants. Religion affected 11 of 23 participants' decisions, while partner expectations influenced 10 of 23 participants. Working with an interpreter and the quality of interpretation were crucial for Spanish-speaking individuals. Most participants (59%) felt that the provider's understanding of the patient’s cultural background was important for decision-making.  \\nConclusions. While there was no association between language discordance and decisional conflict, several factors influencing prenatal decision-making were identified. The use and quality of interpretation significantly affected decision-making and should be prioritized for patients with LEP. Religion and partner expectations were found to be highly influential in decision-making. Respondents also emphasized the importance of the provider's understanding of the patient’s cultural background.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kansas journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kansas journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol17.21375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol17.21375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。文化的综合定义包括共同的规范、信仰、期望、语言和习俗,所有这些都是与英语水平有限(LEP)的患者打交道时需要考虑的重要因素。在本研究中,作者探讨了语言、外部影响和患者-医护人员关系因素如何与产前护理患者的决策冲突相关联。 研究方法作者进行了一项横断面研究,以评估与产后避孕、选择性引产和新生儿喂养方法有关的决策冲突。调查内容包括人口统计学、沟通方法、外部影响和提供者信任度等问题,调查对象为讲英语或西班牙语的产前护理患者。数据分析包括描述性统计和卡方分析。 结果。在 23 位受访者中,12 位讲西班牙语,11 位讲英语。与讲英语的受访者相比,讲西班牙语的受访者购买医疗保险的可能性较低(χ2(1, N = 23) = 3.67, p = 0.016)。讲英语和西班牙语的参与者在决策冲突方面没有明显的统计学差异。宗教影响了 23 位参与者中 11 位的决定,而对伴侣的期望则影响了 23 位参与者中的 10 位。对于讲西班牙语的人来说,与口译员合作和口译质量至关重要。大多数参与者(59%)认为,医疗服务提供者对患者文化背景的了解对决策非常重要。 结论。虽然语言不一致与决策冲突之间没有关联,但发现了影响产前决策的几个因素。口译的使用和质量对决策有重要影响,对于有 LEP 的患者应优先考虑。宗教信仰和伴侣的期望对决策的影响很大。受访者还强调了医疗服务提供者了解患者文化背景的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prenatal Decision-Making in Patients with Limited English Proficiency: What Factors are Involved?
Introduction. A comprehensive definition of culture encompasses shared norms, beliefs, expectations, language, and customs, all of which are crucial considerations when working with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). In this study, the authors examined how language, external influences, and patient-provider relational factors associated with decisional conflict in prenatal care patients.       Methods. The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to assess decisional conflict related to postpartum contraception, elective induction, and newborn feeding methods. The survey included questions about demographics, communication methods, external influences, and provider trust, and was distributed to prenatal care patients who spoke either English or Spanish. Data analysis involved using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses.   Results. Out of the 23 respondents, 12 were Spanish-speaking and 11 were English-speaking. Spanish-speaking participants were less likely to have health insurance compared to English-speaking participants (χ2(1, N = 23) = 3.67, p = 0.016). There was no statistically significant difference in decisional conflict between English- and Spanish-speaking participants. Religion affected 11 of 23 participants' decisions, while partner expectations influenced 10 of 23 participants. Working with an interpreter and the quality of interpretation were crucial for Spanish-speaking individuals. Most participants (59%) felt that the provider's understanding of the patient’s cultural background was important for decision-making.   Conclusions. While there was no association between language discordance and decisional conflict, several factors influencing prenatal decision-making were identified. The use and quality of interpretation significantly affected decision-making and should be prioritized for patients with LEP. Religion and partner expectations were found to be highly influential in decision-making. Respondents also emphasized the importance of the provider's understanding of the patient’s cultural background.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信