PIM 3 评分与传统评分系统的可行性和可靠性比较分析传统评分系统的可行性和可靠性的比较分析:来自单一机构的启示

Abdul Hareesh, Sharanabasappa Haseeb, Malashetty, Sharanabasappa Malashetty
{"title":"PIM 3 评分与传统评分系统的可行性和可靠性比较分析传统评分系统的可行性和可靠性的比较分析:来自单一机构的启示","authors":"Abdul Hareesh, Sharanabasappa Haseeb, Malashetty, Sharanabasappa Malashetty","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This comparative analysis explores the feasibility and reliability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM 3) Score in contrast to traditional scoring systems within the context of a single institution. The study delves into the intricate landscape where the contemporary PIM 3 score converges with the time-honored methodologies of conventional scoring systems, offering valuable insights into prognostic evaluation. \nMethods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, involving patients aged 1 mo to 18 y. The study focused on children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for at least 1 hour, studying the feasibility of obtaining PIM 3 scores within the first hour. Exclusion criteria included neonates, infants less than one-month-old, and children requiring elective procedural sedation. Feasibility was assessed, and logistic regression was employed to evaluate PIM 3's ability to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. \nResults: The training dataset comprised 2,534 patients with a mean age of 8.2 y. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, race, patient type, and origin, were well-distributed. Trauma and variables like elective admission and mechanical ventilation in the first hour were infrequent. The mortality rate across datasets was 1.0%. The PIM 3 risk of mortality and PICU medical length of stay were calculated, forming a comprehensive overview of patient profiles. \nConclusion: The comparative analysis unfolds as a cerebral sojourn, revealing the intricate dance of perplexity and burstiness in the juxtaposition of PIM 3 score against traditional scoring systems. The study contributes nuanced insights, portraying each word and concept as integral notes in the composition of knowledge. This singular institutional perspective offers a profound understanding into the intricacies of prognostic evaluation, creating a narrative that transcends conventional methodologies.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEASIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF PIM 3 SCORE VS. TRADITIONAL SCORING SYSTEMS: INSIGHTS FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Hareesh, Sharanabasappa Haseeb, Malashetty, Sharanabasappa Malashetty\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This comparative analysis explores the feasibility and reliability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM 3) Score in contrast to traditional scoring systems within the context of a single institution. The study delves into the intricate landscape where the contemporary PIM 3 score converges with the time-honored methodologies of conventional scoring systems, offering valuable insights into prognostic evaluation. \\nMethods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, involving patients aged 1 mo to 18 y. The study focused on children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for at least 1 hour, studying the feasibility of obtaining PIM 3 scores within the first hour. Exclusion criteria included neonates, infants less than one-month-old, and children requiring elective procedural sedation. Feasibility was assessed, and logistic regression was employed to evaluate PIM 3's ability to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. \\nResults: The training dataset comprised 2,534 patients with a mean age of 8.2 y. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, race, patient type, and origin, were well-distributed. Trauma and variables like elective admission and mechanical ventilation in the first hour were infrequent. The mortality rate across datasets was 1.0%. The PIM 3 risk of mortality and PICU medical length of stay were calculated, forming a comprehensive overview of patient profiles. \\nConclusion: The comparative analysis unfolds as a cerebral sojourn, revealing the intricate dance of perplexity and burstiness in the juxtaposition of PIM 3 score against traditional scoring systems. The study contributes nuanced insights, portraying each word and concept as integral notes in the composition of knowledge. This singular institutional perspective offers a profound understanding into the intricacies of prognostic evaluation, creating a narrative that transcends conventional methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本对比分析探讨了儿科死亡率指数 3(PIM 3)评分与传统评分系统在单一机构内的可行性和可靠性。研究深入探讨了当代 PIM 3 评分与传统评分系统历史悠久的方法相融合的复杂情况,为预后评估提供了宝贵的见解。研究方法班加罗尔的马尼帕尔医院开展了一项观察性前瞻性队列研究,涉及 1 个月至 18 岁的患者。研究重点是在儿科重症监护室(PICU)住院至少 1 小时的儿童,研究在第一小时内获得 PIM 3 评分的可行性。排除标准包括新生儿、不足一个月的婴儿以及需要选择性程序镇静的儿童。对可行性进行了评估,并采用逻辑回归法评估了 PIM 3 区分幸存者和非幸存者的能力。结果:训练数据集包括 2,534 名患者,平均年龄为 8.2 岁。患者特征(包括年龄、性别、种族、患者类型和籍贯)分布良好。外伤以及择期入院和一小时内机械通气等变量并不常见。各数据集的死亡率为 1.0%。通过计算 PIM 3 死亡风险和 PICU 医疗住院时间,可以全面了解患者的情况。结论对比分析就像一次脑中的旅行,揭示了 PIM 3 评分与传统评分系统并置时所产生的错综复杂的迷惑性和突发性。这项研究提出了细致入微的见解,将每个单词和概念描绘成知识构成中不可或缺的音符。这种独特的机构视角让人深刻理解了预后评估的复杂性,创造了一种超越传统方法论的叙事方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEASIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF PIM 3 SCORE VS. TRADITIONAL SCORING SYSTEMS: INSIGHTS FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION
Objective: This comparative analysis explores the feasibility and reliability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM 3) Score in contrast to traditional scoring systems within the context of a single institution. The study delves into the intricate landscape where the contemporary PIM 3 score converges with the time-honored methodologies of conventional scoring systems, offering valuable insights into prognostic evaluation. Methods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, involving patients aged 1 mo to 18 y. The study focused on children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for at least 1 hour, studying the feasibility of obtaining PIM 3 scores within the first hour. Exclusion criteria included neonates, infants less than one-month-old, and children requiring elective procedural sedation. Feasibility was assessed, and logistic regression was employed to evaluate PIM 3's ability to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. Results: The training dataset comprised 2,534 patients with a mean age of 8.2 y. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, race, patient type, and origin, were well-distributed. Trauma and variables like elective admission and mechanical ventilation in the first hour were infrequent. The mortality rate across datasets was 1.0%. The PIM 3 risk of mortality and PICU medical length of stay were calculated, forming a comprehensive overview of patient profiles. Conclusion: The comparative analysis unfolds as a cerebral sojourn, revealing the intricate dance of perplexity and burstiness in the juxtaposition of PIM 3 score against traditional scoring systems. The study contributes nuanced insights, portraying each word and concept as integral notes in the composition of knowledge. This singular institutional perspective offers a profound understanding into the intricacies of prognostic evaluation, creating a narrative that transcends conventional methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信