作为碳汇的未来建筑:基于木材的建筑类型在碳排放和碳储存方面的比较分析

IF 2.2 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Daria Dzhurko, Ben Haacke, Asta Haberbosch, Linde Köhne, Nora König, Frida Lode, Antonia Marx, Luka Mühlnickel, Nina Neunzig, Annika Niemann, Henrieke Polewka, Lea Schmidtke, Pia Luz Marie Von der Groeben, Karl Wagemann, Farah Thoma, Clemens Bothe, Galina Churkina
{"title":"作为碳汇的未来建筑:基于木材的建筑类型在碳排放和碳储存方面的比较分析","authors":"Daria Dzhurko, Ben Haacke, Asta Haberbosch, Linde Köhne, Nora König, Frida Lode, Antonia Marx, Luka Mühlnickel, Nina Neunzig, Annika Niemann, Henrieke Polewka, Lea Schmidtke, Pia Luz Marie Von der Groeben, Karl Wagemann, Farah Thoma, Clemens Bothe, Galina Churkina","doi":"10.3389/fbuil.2024.1330105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The building and construction sector is responsible for a large share of carbon emissions resulting in the need to reduce them to mitigate climate change. Timber construction methods promise to lower emissions combined with biogenic carbon storage in the built environment. While there are several studies comparing the emissions of mineral-based and timber-based buildings, a consistent comparison of different timber-based building assemblies is still missing. This study compares carbon emissions from material production and carbon storage capabilities of four timber-based and two brick and reinforced concrete building assemblies. These assemblies were designed for a residential multi-storey building in Berlin, Germany. To compare and rank the carbon impacts of these assemblies we introduce a carbon storage-to-emission ratio. The calculations were performed using a Carbon Cycle Assessment Model implementation in Python. The results indicate an average reduction in carbon emissions of timber-based building assemblies by 32.6% to “Brick” and 40.4% to “Reinforced Concrete”, respectively. Across the timber-based building assemblies, the carbon emissions range between 85 t and 115 t, leading to an average of 105 t per building. Pronounced differences were observed in carbon storage, with the “Dowel Laminated Timber” building assembly storing more than three times the amount of carbon compared to “Light Weight Timber” assembly. To further reduce emissions from buildings and the construction sector and potentially enhance urban carbon storage, “Glue Laminated Timber” and “Dowel Laminated Timber” building assemblies were identified as the most promising.","PeriodicalId":37112,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future buildings as carbon sinks: Comparative analysis of timber-based building typologies regarding their carbon emissions and storage\",\"authors\":\"Daria Dzhurko, Ben Haacke, Asta Haberbosch, Linde Köhne, Nora König, Frida Lode, Antonia Marx, Luka Mühlnickel, Nina Neunzig, Annika Niemann, Henrieke Polewka, Lea Schmidtke, Pia Luz Marie Von der Groeben, Karl Wagemann, Farah Thoma, Clemens Bothe, Galina Churkina\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbuil.2024.1330105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The building and construction sector is responsible for a large share of carbon emissions resulting in the need to reduce them to mitigate climate change. Timber construction methods promise to lower emissions combined with biogenic carbon storage in the built environment. While there are several studies comparing the emissions of mineral-based and timber-based buildings, a consistent comparison of different timber-based building assemblies is still missing. This study compares carbon emissions from material production and carbon storage capabilities of four timber-based and two brick and reinforced concrete building assemblies. These assemblies were designed for a residential multi-storey building in Berlin, Germany. To compare and rank the carbon impacts of these assemblies we introduce a carbon storage-to-emission ratio. The calculations were performed using a Carbon Cycle Assessment Model implementation in Python. The results indicate an average reduction in carbon emissions of timber-based building assemblies by 32.6% to “Brick” and 40.4% to “Reinforced Concrete”, respectively. Across the timber-based building assemblies, the carbon emissions range between 85 t and 115 t, leading to an average of 105 t per building. Pronounced differences were observed in carbon storage, with the “Dowel Laminated Timber” building assembly storing more than three times the amount of carbon compared to “Light Weight Timber” assembly. To further reduce emissions from buildings and the construction sector and potentially enhance urban carbon storage, “Glue Laminated Timber” and “Dowel Laminated Timber” building assemblies were identified as the most promising.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Built Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1330105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1330105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑行业的碳排放量占很大比例,因此需要减少碳排放量以减缓气候变化。木材建筑方法有望降低排放量,并在建筑环境中储存生物碳。虽然有几项研究比较了矿物建筑和木材建筑的排放量,但仍缺乏对不同木材建筑组件的一致性比较。本研究比较了四种木材建筑组件和两种砖混建筑组件的材料生产碳排放量和碳储存能力。这些装配式建筑是为德国柏林的一栋多层住宅楼设计的。为了对这些装配式建筑的碳影响进行比较和排序,我们引入了碳储存与排放比率。计算使用 Python 中的碳循环评估模型实现。结果表明,与 "砖结构 "和 "钢筋混凝土结构 "相比,木结构建筑的平均碳排放量分别减少了 32.6% 和 40.4%。在所有木结构建筑中,碳排放量介于 85 吨和 115 吨之间,平均每栋建筑为 105 吨。在碳储存方面观察到明显的差异,"道钉层压木材 "建筑组件的碳储存量是 "轻质木材 "组件的三倍多。为了进一步减少建筑物和建筑部门的排放,并有可能提高城市碳储存量,"胶合层压材 "和 "道钉层压材 "建筑组件被认为是最有前途的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Future buildings as carbon sinks: Comparative analysis of timber-based building typologies regarding their carbon emissions and storage
The building and construction sector is responsible for a large share of carbon emissions resulting in the need to reduce them to mitigate climate change. Timber construction methods promise to lower emissions combined with biogenic carbon storage in the built environment. While there are several studies comparing the emissions of mineral-based and timber-based buildings, a consistent comparison of different timber-based building assemblies is still missing. This study compares carbon emissions from material production and carbon storage capabilities of four timber-based and two brick and reinforced concrete building assemblies. These assemblies were designed for a residential multi-storey building in Berlin, Germany. To compare and rank the carbon impacts of these assemblies we introduce a carbon storage-to-emission ratio. The calculations were performed using a Carbon Cycle Assessment Model implementation in Python. The results indicate an average reduction in carbon emissions of timber-based building assemblies by 32.6% to “Brick” and 40.4% to “Reinforced Concrete”, respectively. Across the timber-based building assemblies, the carbon emissions range between 85 t and 115 t, leading to an average of 105 t per building. Pronounced differences were observed in carbon storage, with the “Dowel Laminated Timber” building assembly storing more than three times the amount of carbon compared to “Light Weight Timber” assembly. To further reduce emissions from buildings and the construction sector and potentially enhance urban carbon storage, “Glue Laminated Timber” and “Dowel Laminated Timber” building assemblies were identified as the most promising.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Built Environment
Frontiers in Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
266
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信