南非肠杆菌对磷霉素的药敏试验和耐药性机制

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jessica S. Hurwitz, M. Newton-Foot, K. Nel van Zyl, Pieter Nel
{"title":"南非肠杆菌对磷霉素的药敏试验和耐药性机制","authors":"Jessica S. Hurwitz, M. Newton-Foot, K. Nel van Zyl, Pieter Nel","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections is increasingly attractive due to escalating antibiotic resistance rates among urinary pathogens. Standard antibiotic susceptibility testing methods perform poorly for fosfomycin as there is poor correlation between susceptibility results and clinical outcomes in urinary pathogens other than Escherichia coli.Objective: We evaluated the performance of fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to determine whether fosfomycin susceptibility is associated with molecular resistance mechanisms.Methods: Forty-six each of E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were obtained from a tertiary hospital in South Africa, from 01 June 2017 to 31 January 2018. Agar dilution, disk diffusion, and gradient diffusion were performed and interpreted using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Molecular resistance mechanisms were identified by whole genome sequence analysis.Results: Disk diffusion and gradient diffusion were accurate alternatives for fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli (98% categorical agreement), but not in K. pneumoniae (47% categorical agreement). All E. coli isolates contained at least one resistance mechanism, but only one isolate with a fosA gene was resistant. In K. pneumoniae, 63% (29/46) and 70% (32/46) of isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin, using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints, respectively, despite all isolates containing a fosA gene and a uhpT mutation.Conclusion: A better understanding of fosfomycin susceptibility and improved antibiotic susceptibility testing tools could improve diagnostic capability and clinical guidelines for fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections.What this study adds: This study highlights the importance of adhering to interpretive guidelines when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the need for simplified, accurate and standardised susceptibility testing methodology and interpretation for fosfomycin in Enterobacterales organisms.","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fosfomycin susceptibility testing and resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Jessica S. Hurwitz, M. Newton-Foot, K. Nel van Zyl, Pieter Nel\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections is increasingly attractive due to escalating antibiotic resistance rates among urinary pathogens. Standard antibiotic susceptibility testing methods perform poorly for fosfomycin as there is poor correlation between susceptibility results and clinical outcomes in urinary pathogens other than Escherichia coli.Objective: We evaluated the performance of fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to determine whether fosfomycin susceptibility is associated with molecular resistance mechanisms.Methods: Forty-six each of E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were obtained from a tertiary hospital in South Africa, from 01 June 2017 to 31 January 2018. Agar dilution, disk diffusion, and gradient diffusion were performed and interpreted using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Molecular resistance mechanisms were identified by whole genome sequence analysis.Results: Disk diffusion and gradient diffusion were accurate alternatives for fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli (98% categorical agreement), but not in K. pneumoniae (47% categorical agreement). All E. coli isolates contained at least one resistance mechanism, but only one isolate with a fosA gene was resistant. In K. pneumoniae, 63% (29/46) and 70% (32/46) of isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin, using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints, respectively, despite all isolates containing a fosA gene and a uhpT mutation.Conclusion: A better understanding of fosfomycin susceptibility and improved antibiotic susceptibility testing tools could improve diagnostic capability and clinical guidelines for fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections.What this study adds: This study highlights the importance of adhering to interpretive guidelines when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the need for simplified, accurate and standardised susceptibility testing methodology and interpretation for fosfomycin in Enterobacterales organisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于泌尿系统病原体对抗生素的耐药率不断上升,磷霉素治疗泌尿系统感染的吸引力与日俱增。标准抗生素药敏试验方法对磷霉素的效果不佳,因为除大肠杆菌外,其他泌尿系统病原体的药敏结果与临床结果之间的相关性很差:我们评估了大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌对磷霉素的药敏试验结果,以确定磷霉素药敏是否与分子耐药机制有关:2017年6月1日至2018年1月31日,从南非一家三级医院获得了大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌临床分离株各46株。根据临床实验室标准协会和欧洲抗菌药敏感性检测委员会的指南,进行了琼脂稀释、盘扩散和梯度扩散,并对其进行了解释。通过全基因组序列分析确定了分子耐药性机制:结果:磁盘扩散和梯度扩散是大肠杆菌对磷霉素敏感性检测的准确替代方法(分类一致率为 98%),但对肺炎双球菌的检测结果不准确(分类一致率为 47%)。所有大肠杆菌分离物都含有至少一种耐药机制,但只有一个含有 fosA 基因的分离物具有耐药性。在肺炎克氏菌中,尽管所有分离物都含有 fosA 基因和 uhpT 突变,但根据临床实验室标准协会和欧洲抗菌药敏感性检测委员会的断点,分别有 63% (29/46)和 70% (32/46)的分离物对磷霉素敏感:结论:更好地了解磷霉素的药敏性并改进抗生素药敏测试工具,可提高诊断能力并改善磷霉素治疗尿路感染的临床指南:本研究强调了在进行抗菌素药敏试验时遵守解释性指南的重要性,以及简化、准确和标准化肠杆菌科细菌对磷霉素的药敏试验方法和解释的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fosfomycin susceptibility testing and resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales in South Africa
Background: Fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections is increasingly attractive due to escalating antibiotic resistance rates among urinary pathogens. Standard antibiotic susceptibility testing methods perform poorly for fosfomycin as there is poor correlation between susceptibility results and clinical outcomes in urinary pathogens other than Escherichia coli.Objective: We evaluated the performance of fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to determine whether fosfomycin susceptibility is associated with molecular resistance mechanisms.Methods: Forty-six each of E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were obtained from a tertiary hospital in South Africa, from 01 June 2017 to 31 January 2018. Agar dilution, disk diffusion, and gradient diffusion were performed and interpreted using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Molecular resistance mechanisms were identified by whole genome sequence analysis.Results: Disk diffusion and gradient diffusion were accurate alternatives for fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli (98% categorical agreement), but not in K. pneumoniae (47% categorical agreement). All E. coli isolates contained at least one resistance mechanism, but only one isolate with a fosA gene was resistant. In K. pneumoniae, 63% (29/46) and 70% (32/46) of isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin, using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints, respectively, despite all isolates containing a fosA gene and a uhpT mutation.Conclusion: A better understanding of fosfomycin susceptibility and improved antibiotic susceptibility testing tools could improve diagnostic capability and clinical guidelines for fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections.What this study adds: This study highlights the importance of adhering to interpretive guidelines when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the need for simplified, accurate and standardised susceptibility testing methodology and interpretation for fosfomycin in Enterobacterales organisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信