轨道 GNC 的地面验证:机器人试验台设施中的视觉导航评估

IF 6.5 1区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Vivek Muralidharan, Mohatashem Reyaz Makhdoomi, Augustinas Žinys, Bronislovas Razgus, Marius Klimavičius, Miguel Olivares-Mendez, Carol Martinez
{"title":"轨道 GNC 的地面验证:机器人试验台设施中的视觉导航评估","authors":"Vivek Muralidharan,&nbsp;Mohatashem Reyaz Makhdoomi,&nbsp;Augustinas Žinys,&nbsp;Bronislovas Razgus,&nbsp;Marius Klimavičius,&nbsp;Miguel Olivares-Mendez,&nbsp;Carol Martinez","doi":"10.1007/s42064-024-0198-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CubeSats have become versatile platforms for various space missions (e.g., on-orbit servicing and debris removal) owing to their low cost and flexibility. Many space tasks involve proximity operations that require precise guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) algorithms. Vision-based navigation is attracting interest for such operations. However, extreme lighting conditions in space challenge optical techniques. The on-ground validation of such navigation systems for orbital GNC becomes crucial to ensure their reliability during space operations. These systems undergo rigorous testing within their anticipated operational parameters, including the exploration of potential edge cases. The ability of GNC algorithms to function effectively under extreme space conditions that exceed anticipated scenarios is crucial, particularly in space missions where the scope of errors is negligible. This paper presents the ground validation of a GNC algorithm designed for autonomous satellite rendezvous by leveraging hardware-in-the-loop experiments. This study focuses on two key areas. First, the rationale underlying the augmentation of the robot workspace (six-degree-of-freedom UR10e robot + linear rail) is investigated to emulate relatively longer trajectories with complete position and orientation states. Second, the control algorithm is assessed in response to uncertain pose observations from a vision-based navigation system. The results indicate increased control costs with uncertain navigation and exemplify the importance of on-ground testing for system validation before launch, particularly in extreme cases that are typically difficult to assess using software-based testing.</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":52291,"journal":{"name":"Astrodynamics","volume":"9 3","pages":"343 - 367"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42064-024-0198-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-ground validation of orbital GNC: Visual navigation assessment in robotic testbed facility\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Muralidharan,&nbsp;Mohatashem Reyaz Makhdoomi,&nbsp;Augustinas Žinys,&nbsp;Bronislovas Razgus,&nbsp;Marius Klimavičius,&nbsp;Miguel Olivares-Mendez,&nbsp;Carol Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42064-024-0198-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>CubeSats have become versatile platforms for various space missions (e.g., on-orbit servicing and debris removal) owing to their low cost and flexibility. Many space tasks involve proximity operations that require precise guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) algorithms. Vision-based navigation is attracting interest for such operations. However, extreme lighting conditions in space challenge optical techniques. The on-ground validation of such navigation systems for orbital GNC becomes crucial to ensure their reliability during space operations. These systems undergo rigorous testing within their anticipated operational parameters, including the exploration of potential edge cases. The ability of GNC algorithms to function effectively under extreme space conditions that exceed anticipated scenarios is crucial, particularly in space missions where the scope of errors is negligible. This paper presents the ground validation of a GNC algorithm designed for autonomous satellite rendezvous by leveraging hardware-in-the-loop experiments. This study focuses on two key areas. First, the rationale underlying the augmentation of the robot workspace (six-degree-of-freedom UR10e robot + linear rail) is investigated to emulate relatively longer trajectories with complete position and orientation states. Second, the control algorithm is assessed in response to uncertain pose observations from a vision-based navigation system. The results indicate increased control costs with uncertain navigation and exemplify the importance of on-ground testing for system validation before launch, particularly in extreme cases that are typically difficult to assess using software-based testing.</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astrodynamics\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"343 - 367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42064-024-0198-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astrodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42064-024-0198-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42064-024-0198-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

立方体卫星由于其低成本和灵活性,已成为各种空间任务(例如在轨服务和碎片清除)的多功能平台。许多太空任务涉及需要精确制导、导航和控制(GNC)算法的近距离操作。基于视觉的导航正在吸引人们对此类操作的兴趣。然而,空间的极端光照条件对光学技术提出了挑战。轨道GNC导航系统的地面验证对于确保其在空间运行中的可靠性至关重要。这些系统在其预期的操作参数范围内进行严格的测试,包括探索潜在的边缘情况。GNC算法在超出预期的极端空间条件下有效运行的能力至关重要,特别是在误差范围可以忽略不计的空间任务中。本文利用硬件在环实验对自主卫星交会GNC算法进行了地面验证。这项研究集中在两个关键领域。首先,研究了增加机器人工作空间(六自由度UR10e机器人+线性轨道)的基本原理,以模拟具有完整位置和姿态状态的相对较长的轨迹。其次,针对视觉导航系统的不确定姿态观测,对控制算法进行了评估。结果表明,不确定的导航会增加控制成本,并举例说明了发射前对系统验证进行地面测试的重要性,特别是在极端情况下,使用基于软件的测试通常难以评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On-ground validation of orbital GNC: Visual navigation assessment in robotic testbed facility

CubeSats have become versatile platforms for various space missions (e.g., on-orbit servicing and debris removal) owing to their low cost and flexibility. Many space tasks involve proximity operations that require precise guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) algorithms. Vision-based navigation is attracting interest for such operations. However, extreme lighting conditions in space challenge optical techniques. The on-ground validation of such navigation systems for orbital GNC becomes crucial to ensure their reliability during space operations. These systems undergo rigorous testing within their anticipated operational parameters, including the exploration of potential edge cases. The ability of GNC algorithms to function effectively under extreme space conditions that exceed anticipated scenarios is crucial, particularly in space missions where the scope of errors is negligible. This paper presents the ground validation of a GNC algorithm designed for autonomous satellite rendezvous by leveraging hardware-in-the-loop experiments. This study focuses on two key areas. First, the rationale underlying the augmentation of the robot workspace (six-degree-of-freedom UR10e robot + linear rail) is investigated to emulate relatively longer trajectories with complete position and orientation states. Second, the control algorithm is assessed in response to uncertain pose observations from a vision-based navigation system. The results indicate increased control costs with uncertain navigation and exemplify the importance of on-ground testing for system validation before launch, particularly in extreme cases that are typically difficult to assess using software-based testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astrodynamics
Astrodynamics Engineering-Aerospace Engineering
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
34.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Astrodynamics is a peer-reviewed international journal that is co-published by Tsinghua University Press and Springer. The high-quality peer-reviewed articles of original research, comprehensive review, mission accomplishments, and technical comments in all fields of astrodynamics will be given priorities for publication. In addition, related research in astronomy and astrophysics that takes advantages of the analytical and computational methods of astrodynamics is also welcome. Astrodynamics would like to invite all of the astrodynamics specialists to submit their research articles to this new journal. Currently, the scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to:Fundamental orbital dynamicsSpacecraft trajectory optimization and space mission designOrbit determination and prediction, autonomous orbital navigationSpacecraft attitude determination, control, and dynamicsGuidance and control of spacecraft and space robotsSpacecraft constellation design and formation flyingModelling, analysis, and optimization of innovative space systemsNovel concepts for space engineering and interdisciplinary applicationsThe effort of the Editorial Board will be ensuring the journal to publish novel researches that advance the field, and will provide authors with a productive, fair, and timely review experience. It is our sincere hope that all researchers in the field of astrodynamics will eagerly access this journal, Astrodynamics, as either authors or readers, making it an illustrious journal that will shape our future space explorations and discoveries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信