{"title":"双语句子处理中的预测","authors":"N. Meir, O. Parshina, Irina A. Sekerina","doi":"10.1075/lab.22102.mei","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Unified Competition Model (MacWhinney, 2012)\n accounts for cross-linguistic differences in thematic role mapping. We investigated production and predictive use of accusative\n case morphology in Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. We also investigated the role of production in predictive processing testing\n the Prediction-by-Production Account (Pickering & Garrod, 2018)\n vs. the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis (Prévost & White,\n 2000). Three groups of children aged 4–8 participated: Russian-Hebrew-speaking bilinguals, Russian-speaking and\n Hebrew-speaking monolingual controls. All children participated in the accusative case production and Visual-World eye-tracking\n comprehension experiments. Bilinguals were tested in both of their languages. The results of the study confirmed the predictions\n of the Unified Competition Model showing typological differences in the strength of the case-marking cue and its\n predictive use in sentence processing in Russian- and Hebrew-speaking controls. While Russian-speaking monolinguals relied on case\n marking to predict the upcoming agent/patient, the performance of Hebrew-speaking monolingual children varied. The findings for\n bilinguals showed that despite their lower production accuracy in both languages, they were either indistinguishable from\n monolinguals or showed an advantage in the predictive use of case morphology. The findings support the Missing Surface\n Inflection Hypothesis, which predicts a dissociation between production and comprehension.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction in bilingual sentence processing\",\"authors\":\"N. Meir, O. Parshina, Irina A. Sekerina\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lab.22102.mei\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Unified Competition Model (MacWhinney, 2012)\\n accounts for cross-linguistic differences in thematic role mapping. We investigated production and predictive use of accusative\\n case morphology in Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. We also investigated the role of production in predictive processing testing\\n the Prediction-by-Production Account (Pickering & Garrod, 2018)\\n vs. the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis (Prévost & White,\\n 2000). Three groups of children aged 4–8 participated: Russian-Hebrew-speaking bilinguals, Russian-speaking and\\n Hebrew-speaking monolingual controls. All children participated in the accusative case production and Visual-World eye-tracking\\n comprehension experiments. Bilinguals were tested in both of their languages. The results of the study confirmed the predictions\\n of the Unified Competition Model showing typological differences in the strength of the case-marking cue and its\\n predictive use in sentence processing in Russian- and Hebrew-speaking controls. While Russian-speaking monolinguals relied on case\\n marking to predict the upcoming agent/patient, the performance of Hebrew-speaking monolingual children varied. The findings for\\n bilinguals showed that despite their lower production accuracy in both languages, they were either indistinguishable from\\n monolinguals or showed an advantage in the predictive use of case morphology. The findings support the Missing Surface\\n Inflection Hypothesis, which predicts a dissociation between production and comprehension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22102.mei\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22102.mei","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Unified Competition Model (MacWhinney, 2012)
accounts for cross-linguistic differences in thematic role mapping. We investigated production and predictive use of accusative
case morphology in Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. We also investigated the role of production in predictive processing testing
the Prediction-by-Production Account (Pickering & Garrod, 2018)
vs. the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis (Prévost & White,
2000). Three groups of children aged 4–8 participated: Russian-Hebrew-speaking bilinguals, Russian-speaking and
Hebrew-speaking monolingual controls. All children participated in the accusative case production and Visual-World eye-tracking
comprehension experiments. Bilinguals were tested in both of their languages. The results of the study confirmed the predictions
of the Unified Competition Model showing typological differences in the strength of the case-marking cue and its
predictive use in sentence processing in Russian- and Hebrew-speaking controls. While Russian-speaking monolinguals relied on case
marking to predict the upcoming agent/patient, the performance of Hebrew-speaking monolingual children varied. The findings for
bilinguals showed that despite their lower production accuracy in both languages, they were either indistinguishable from
monolinguals or showed an advantage in the predictive use of case morphology. The findings support the Missing Surface
Inflection Hypothesis, which predicts a dissociation between production and comprehension.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.