保护性耕作密度对平均产量和产量风险的影响

Ayesha Cooray , Roderick M. Rejesus , Serkan Aglasan , Zheng Li , Alex Woodley
{"title":"保护性耕作密度对平均产量和产量风险的影响","authors":"Ayesha Cooray ,&nbsp;Roderick M. Rejesus ,&nbsp;Serkan Aglasan ,&nbsp;Zheng Li ,&nbsp;Alex Woodley","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the productivity and production risk effects of conservation tillage practices are important so that growers can make better decisions about tillage systems appropriate for their farm operations. This study investigates the mean yield and yield risk effects of conservation tillage practices with varying levels of tillage intensity and timing. Long-term field trial data for corn (<em>Zea mays, L.</em>) and soybeans (<em>Glycine max, L. Merr.</em>) in the North Carolina Piedmont, together with moment-based regression models, were used to achieve the objective of the study. Our empirical analysis suggests that conservation tillage treatments (with lower tillage intensities and higher residue levels) consistently have higher mean yields than conventional tillage practices in the sandy loam soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. However, we find that conservation tillage practices with lower intensities (and higher residue levels) do not generally have a consistent statistically significant risk reducing effect based on the higher-order moments of the yield distribution (e.g., variance, skewness, and kurtosis). This indicates that conservation tillage does not consistently result in statistically lower production risk relative to conventional tillage methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436/pdfft?md5=911459973acbe91b36203528e701eb68&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006223000436-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Conservation Tillage Intensities on Mean Yields and Yield Risk\",\"authors\":\"Ayesha Cooray ,&nbsp;Roderick M. Rejesus ,&nbsp;Serkan Aglasan ,&nbsp;Zheng Li ,&nbsp;Alex Woodley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding the productivity and production risk effects of conservation tillage practices are important so that growers can make better decisions about tillage systems appropriate for their farm operations. This study investigates the mean yield and yield risk effects of conservation tillage practices with varying levels of tillage intensity and timing. Long-term field trial data for corn (<em>Zea mays, L.</em>) and soybeans (<em>Glycine max, L. Merr.</em>) in the North Carolina Piedmont, together with moment-based regression models, were used to achieve the objective of the study. Our empirical analysis suggests that conservation tillage treatments (with lower tillage intensities and higher residue levels) consistently have higher mean yields than conventional tillage practices in the sandy loam soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. However, we find that conservation tillage practices with lower intensities (and higher residue levels) do not generally have a consistent statistically significant risk reducing effect based on the higher-order moments of the yield distribution (e.g., variance, skewness, and kurtosis). This indicates that conservation tillage does not consistently result in statistically lower production risk relative to conventional tillage methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil security\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436/pdfft?md5=911459973acbe91b36203528e701eb68&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006223000436-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解保护性耕作方法对产量和生产风险的影响非常重要,这样种植者就能更好地决定适合其农业生产的耕作制度。本研究调查了不同耕作强度和时间水平的保护性耕作方法对平均产量和产量风险的影响。研究采用了北卡罗来纳州皮德蒙特地区玉米(Zea mays, L.)和大豆(Glycine max, L. Merr.)的长期田间试验数据以及基于矩的回归模型来实现研究目标。我们的实证分析表明,在北卡罗来纳州皮德蒙特的沙质壤土中,保护性耕作处理(耕作强度较低,残留水平较高)的平均产量始终高于传统耕作方法。然而,我们发现,根据产量分布的高阶矩(如方差、偏斜度和峰度),强度较低(残留水平较高)的保护性耕作方法通常并不具有一致的统计意义上的显著风险降低效果。这表明,与传统耕作方法相比,保护性耕作在统计上并不能持续降低生产风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Conservation Tillage Intensities on Mean Yields and Yield Risk

Understanding the productivity and production risk effects of conservation tillage practices are important so that growers can make better decisions about tillage systems appropriate for their farm operations. This study investigates the mean yield and yield risk effects of conservation tillage practices with varying levels of tillage intensity and timing. Long-term field trial data for corn (Zea mays, L.) and soybeans (Glycine max, L. Merr.) in the North Carolina Piedmont, together with moment-based regression models, were used to achieve the objective of the study. Our empirical analysis suggests that conservation tillage treatments (with lower tillage intensities and higher residue levels) consistently have higher mean yields than conventional tillage practices in the sandy loam soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. However, we find that conservation tillage practices with lower intensities (and higher residue levels) do not generally have a consistent statistically significant risk reducing effect based on the higher-order moments of the yield distribution (e.g., variance, skewness, and kurtosis). This indicates that conservation tillage does not consistently result in statistically lower production risk relative to conventional tillage methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信