Ayesha Cooray , Roderick M. Rejesus , Serkan Aglasan , Zheng Li , Alex Woodley
{"title":"保护性耕作密度对平均产量和产量风险的影响","authors":"Ayesha Cooray , Roderick M. Rejesus , Serkan Aglasan , Zheng Li , Alex Woodley","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the productivity and production risk effects of conservation tillage practices are important so that growers can make better decisions about tillage systems appropriate for their farm operations. This study investigates the mean yield and yield risk effects of conservation tillage practices with varying levels of tillage intensity and timing. Long-term field trial data for corn (<em>Zea mays, L.</em>) and soybeans (<em>Glycine max, L. Merr.</em>) in the North Carolina Piedmont, together with moment-based regression models, were used to achieve the objective of the study. Our empirical analysis suggests that conservation tillage treatments (with lower tillage intensities and higher residue levels) consistently have higher mean yields than conventional tillage practices in the sandy loam soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. However, we find that conservation tillage practices with lower intensities (and higher residue levels) do not generally have a consistent statistically significant risk reducing effect based on the higher-order moments of the yield distribution (e.g., variance, skewness, and kurtosis). This indicates that conservation tillage does not consistently result in statistically lower production risk relative to conventional tillage methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436/pdfft?md5=911459973acbe91b36203528e701eb68&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006223000436-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Conservation Tillage Intensities on Mean Yields and Yield Risk\",\"authors\":\"Ayesha Cooray , Roderick M. Rejesus , Serkan Aglasan , Zheng Li , Alex Woodley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding the productivity and production risk effects of conservation tillage practices are important so that growers can make better decisions about tillage systems appropriate for their farm operations. This study investigates the mean yield and yield risk effects of conservation tillage practices with varying levels of tillage intensity and timing. Long-term field trial data for corn (<em>Zea mays, L.</em>) and soybeans (<em>Glycine max, L. Merr.</em>) in the North Carolina Piedmont, together with moment-based regression models, were used to achieve the objective of the study. Our empirical analysis suggests that conservation tillage treatments (with lower tillage intensities and higher residue levels) consistently have higher mean yields than conventional tillage practices in the sandy loam soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. However, we find that conservation tillage practices with lower intensities (and higher residue levels) do not generally have a consistent statistically significant risk reducing effect based on the higher-order moments of the yield distribution (e.g., variance, skewness, and kurtosis). This indicates that conservation tillage does not consistently result in statistically lower production risk relative to conventional tillage methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil security\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436/pdfft?md5=911459973acbe91b36203528e701eb68&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006223000436-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
了解保护性耕作方法对产量和生产风险的影响非常重要,这样种植者就能更好地决定适合其农业生产的耕作制度。本研究调查了不同耕作强度和时间水平的保护性耕作方法对平均产量和产量风险的影响。研究采用了北卡罗来纳州皮德蒙特地区玉米(Zea mays, L.)和大豆(Glycine max, L. Merr.)的长期田间试验数据以及基于矩的回归模型来实现研究目标。我们的实证分析表明,在北卡罗来纳州皮德蒙特的沙质壤土中,保护性耕作处理(耕作强度较低,残留水平较高)的平均产量始终高于传统耕作方法。然而,我们发现,根据产量分布的高阶矩(如方差、偏斜度和峰度),强度较低(残留水平较高)的保护性耕作方法通常并不具有一致的统计意义上的显著风险降低效果。这表明,与传统耕作方法相比,保护性耕作在统计上并不能持续降低生产风险。
The Impact of Conservation Tillage Intensities on Mean Yields and Yield Risk
Understanding the productivity and production risk effects of conservation tillage practices are important so that growers can make better decisions about tillage systems appropriate for their farm operations. This study investigates the mean yield and yield risk effects of conservation tillage practices with varying levels of tillage intensity and timing. Long-term field trial data for corn (Zea mays, L.) and soybeans (Glycine max, L. Merr.) in the North Carolina Piedmont, together with moment-based regression models, were used to achieve the objective of the study. Our empirical analysis suggests that conservation tillage treatments (with lower tillage intensities and higher residue levels) consistently have higher mean yields than conventional tillage practices in the sandy loam soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. However, we find that conservation tillage practices with lower intensities (and higher residue levels) do not generally have a consistent statistically significant risk reducing effect based on the higher-order moments of the yield distribution (e.g., variance, skewness, and kurtosis). This indicates that conservation tillage does not consistently result in statistically lower production risk relative to conventional tillage methods.