Shivam N. Upadhyaya , Charles H. Crawford III , Grant O. Schmidt , Derek Arrington , John R. Dimar II , Steven D. Glassman , Jeffrey L. Gum , Amer H. Ahmad , Leah Y. Carreon
{"title":"矢状线重建 CT 测得的骨密度与轴向 CT 高度相关,但这两种测量结果与 DEXA T 分数的相关性一般","authors":"Shivam N. Upadhyaya , Charles H. Crawford III , Grant O. Schmidt , Derek Arrington , John R. Dimar II , Steven D. Glassman , Jeffrey L. Gum , Amer H. Ahmad , Leah Y. Carreon","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2024.101980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the preoperative evaluation of a patient being considered for spinal surgery, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been traditionally used to diagnose poor bone mineral density (BMD) as a risk factor. As ordering a DEXA can add cost and delay diagnosis, spine surgeons have more recently began to use Hounsfield Units (HU) measured on computed tomography scans (CT) as a measure of BMD. The aim of our study was to evaluate associations between DEXA and HU on lumbar spine CT scans.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-two patients (32 female, 10 male, mean age = 67.7 years) with DEXA and lumbar spine CT scans performed within one year of each other were identified. DEXA T-scores were collected from the hip, forearm and L1-L4. HU was determined using the maximum region of interest within the cancellous area in the mid-vertebral body from L1-L4 in the sagittal and axial planes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using the lowest T-score, 8 (19 %) cases were osteoporotic and 25 (60 %) were osteopenic. Statistically significant differences in HU were seen in osteoporotic cases (Axial HU = 59.2, Sagittal HU = 61.1, p = 0.006) compared to osteopenic (Axial HU = 119.8, Sagittal HU = 122.9) and normal cases (Axial HU = 141.2, Sagittal HU = 142.3). There were moderate associations between the spine T-scores and CT HUs (Axial HU:r<sup>2</sup> = 0.50, Sagittal HU:r<sup>2</sup> = 0.49, p < 0.001), weak associations between the Axial HU (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, p < 0.000) and Sagittal HU (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, p < 0.000) with hip T-scores, and no correlations with forearm T-scores. There were strong associations between Axial HU and Sagittal HU (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.98, p < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>The results of the current study show a strong association between the sagittal and axial vertebral HU measurements, which supports the clinical use of either measurement technique. The weak correlation between T-scores and HU is consistent with prior studies and warrants future studies to determine which modality will better predict postoperative mechanical failures in patients undergoing spinal surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 101980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751924000264/pdfft?md5=e2b2c07243c64ae65a8b312482b842bd&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751924000264-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone density measured on sagittal reconstructed CT is highly correlated with axial CT but both measurements are only moderately correlated with DEXA T-scores\",\"authors\":\"Shivam N. Upadhyaya , Charles H. Crawford III , Grant O. Schmidt , Derek Arrington , John R. Dimar II , Steven D. Glassman , Jeffrey L. Gum , Amer H. Ahmad , Leah Y. Carreon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inat.2024.101980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the preoperative evaluation of a patient being considered for spinal surgery, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been traditionally used to diagnose poor bone mineral density (BMD) as a risk factor. As ordering a DEXA can add cost and delay diagnosis, spine surgeons have more recently began to use Hounsfield Units (HU) measured on computed tomography scans (CT) as a measure of BMD. The aim of our study was to evaluate associations between DEXA and HU on lumbar spine CT scans.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-two patients (32 female, 10 male, mean age = 67.7 years) with DEXA and lumbar spine CT scans performed within one year of each other were identified. DEXA T-scores were collected from the hip, forearm and L1-L4. HU was determined using the maximum region of interest within the cancellous area in the mid-vertebral body from L1-L4 in the sagittal and axial planes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using the lowest T-score, 8 (19 %) cases were osteoporotic and 25 (60 %) were osteopenic. Statistically significant differences in HU were seen in osteoporotic cases (Axial HU = 59.2, Sagittal HU = 61.1, p = 0.006) compared to osteopenic (Axial HU = 119.8, Sagittal HU = 122.9) and normal cases (Axial HU = 141.2, Sagittal HU = 142.3). There were moderate associations between the spine T-scores and CT HUs (Axial HU:r<sup>2</sup> = 0.50, Sagittal HU:r<sup>2</sup> = 0.49, p < 0.001), weak associations between the Axial HU (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, p < 0.000) and Sagittal HU (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, p < 0.000) with hip T-scores, and no correlations with forearm T-scores. There were strong associations between Axial HU and Sagittal HU (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.98, p < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>The results of the current study show a strong association between the sagittal and axial vertebral HU measurements, which supports the clinical use of either measurement technique. The weak correlation between T-scores and HU is consistent with prior studies and warrants future studies to determine which modality will better predict postoperative mechanical failures in patients undergoing spinal surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>III.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751924000264/pdfft?md5=e2b2c07243c64ae65a8b312482b842bd&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751924000264-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751924000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751924000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景在对考虑接受脊柱手术的患者进行术前评估时,双能 X 射线吸收测量法(DEXA)传统上一直被用来诊断骨矿密度(BMD)低下这一风险因素。由于订购 DEXA 可能会增加成本并延误诊断,脊柱外科医生最近开始使用计算机断层扫描(CT)测量的 Hounsfield 单位(HU)来衡量 BMD。我们的研究旨在评估腰椎 CT 扫描中 DEXA 和 HU 之间的关联。方法确定了 42 名在一年内接受 DEXA 和腰椎 CT 扫描的患者(32 名女性,10 名男性,平均年龄 = 67.7 岁)。从臀部、前臂和 L1-L4 采集 DEXA T 值。使用矢状面和轴向面上 L1-L4 椎体中部松质区内的最大感兴趣区来确定 HU。与骨质疏松病例(轴位 HU = 119.8,矢状位 HU = 122.9)和正常病例(轴位 HU = 141.2,矢状位 HU = 142.3)相比,骨质疏松病例的 HU 有明显的统计学差异(轴位 HU = 59.2,矢状位 HU = 61.1,p = 0.006)。脊柱 T 评分与 CT HU 之间存在中度相关性(轴位 HU:r2 = 0.50,矢状位 HU:r2 = 0.49,p <;0.001),轴位 HU(r2 = 0.48,p <;0.000)和矢状位 HU(r2 = 0.48,p <;0.000)与髋关节 T 评分之间存在微弱相关性,与前臂 T 评分没有相关性。临床相关性目前的研究结果表明,矢状位和轴位椎体HU测量值之间有很强的相关性,这支持了这两种测量技术在临床上的应用。T-scores和HU之间的弱相关性与之前的研究一致,因此有必要在未来进行研究,以确定哪种方式能更好地预测脊柱手术患者的术后机械故障。
Bone density measured on sagittal reconstructed CT is highly correlated with axial CT but both measurements are only moderately correlated with DEXA T-scores
Background
During the preoperative evaluation of a patient being considered for spinal surgery, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been traditionally used to diagnose poor bone mineral density (BMD) as a risk factor. As ordering a DEXA can add cost and delay diagnosis, spine surgeons have more recently began to use Hounsfield Units (HU) measured on computed tomography scans (CT) as a measure of BMD. The aim of our study was to evaluate associations between DEXA and HU on lumbar spine CT scans.
Methods
Forty-two patients (32 female, 10 male, mean age = 67.7 years) with DEXA and lumbar spine CT scans performed within one year of each other were identified. DEXA T-scores were collected from the hip, forearm and L1-L4. HU was determined using the maximum region of interest within the cancellous area in the mid-vertebral body from L1-L4 in the sagittal and axial planes.
Results
Using the lowest T-score, 8 (19 %) cases were osteoporotic and 25 (60 %) were osteopenic. Statistically significant differences in HU were seen in osteoporotic cases (Axial HU = 59.2, Sagittal HU = 61.1, p = 0.006) compared to osteopenic (Axial HU = 119.8, Sagittal HU = 122.9) and normal cases (Axial HU = 141.2, Sagittal HU = 142.3). There were moderate associations between the spine T-scores and CT HUs (Axial HU:r2 = 0.50, Sagittal HU:r2 = 0.49, p < 0.001), weak associations between the Axial HU (r2 = 0.48, p < 0.000) and Sagittal HU (r2 = 0.48, p < 0.000) with hip T-scores, and no correlations with forearm T-scores. There were strong associations between Axial HU and Sagittal HU (r2 = 0.98, p < 0.001).
Clinical relevance
The results of the current study show a strong association between the sagittal and axial vertebral HU measurements, which supports the clinical use of either measurement technique. The weak correlation between T-scores and HU is consistent with prior studies and warrants future studies to determine which modality will better predict postoperative mechanical failures in patients undergoing spinal surgery.