轻量级预处理和模板匹配有助于简化缺血性心肌瘢痕分类。

IF 1.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024503
Michael H Udin, Sara Armstrong, Alice Kai, Scott Doyle, Ciprian N Ionita, Saraswati Pokharel, Umesh C Sharma
{"title":"轻量级预处理和模板匹配有助于简化缺血性心肌瘢痕分类。","authors":"Michael H Udin, Sara Armstrong, Alice Kai, Scott Doyle, Ciprian N Ionita, Saraswati Pokharel, Umesh C Sharma","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ischemic myocardial scarring (IMS) is a common outcome of coronary artery disease that potentially leads to lethal arrythmias and heart failure. Late-gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging scans have served as the diagnostic bedrock for IMS, with recent advancements in machine learning enabling enhanced scar classification. However, the trade-off for these improvements is intensive computational and time demands. As a solution, we propose a combination of lightweight preprocessing (LWP) and template matching (TM) to streamline IMS classification.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>CMR images from 279 patients (151 IMS, 128 control) were classified for IMS presence using two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and TM, both with and without LWP. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and processing time. External testing dataset analysis encompassed patient-level classifications (PLCs) and a CNN versus TM classification comparison (CVTCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LWP enhanced the speed of both CNNs (4.9x) and TM (21.9x). Furthermore, in the absence of LWP, TM outpaced CNNs by over 10x, while with LWP, TM was more than 100x faster. Additionally, TM performed similarly to the CNNs in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUROC, with PLCs demonstrating improvements across all five metrics. Moreover, the CVTCC revealed a substantial 90.9% agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight the effectiveness of LWP and TM in streamlining IMS classification. Anticipated enhancements to LWP's region of interest (ROI) isolation and TM's ROI targeting are expected to boost accuracy, positioning them as a potential alternative to CNNs for IMS classification, supporting the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lightweight preprocessing and template matching facilitate streamlined ischemic myocardial scar classification.\",\"authors\":\"Michael H Udin, Sara Armstrong, Alice Kai, Scott Doyle, Ciprian N Ionita, Saraswati Pokharel, Umesh C Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ischemic myocardial scarring (IMS) is a common outcome of coronary artery disease that potentially leads to lethal arrythmias and heart failure. Late-gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging scans have served as the diagnostic bedrock for IMS, with recent advancements in machine learning enabling enhanced scar classification. However, the trade-off for these improvements is intensive computational and time demands. As a solution, we propose a combination of lightweight preprocessing (LWP) and template matching (TM) to streamline IMS classification.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>CMR images from 279 patients (151 IMS, 128 control) were classified for IMS presence using two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and TM, both with and without LWP. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and processing time. External testing dataset analysis encompassed patient-level classifications (PLCs) and a CNN versus TM classification comparison (CVTCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LWP enhanced the speed of both CNNs (4.9x) and TM (21.9x). Furthermore, in the absence of LWP, TM outpaced CNNs by over 10x, while with LWP, TM was more than 100x faster. Additionally, TM performed similarly to the CNNs in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUROC, with PLCs demonstrating improvements across all five metrics. Moreover, the CVTCC revealed a substantial 90.9% agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight the effectiveness of LWP and TM in streamlining IMS classification. Anticipated enhancements to LWP's region of interest (ROI) isolation and TM's ROI targeting are expected to boost accuracy, positioning them as a potential alternative to CNNs for IMS classification, supporting the need for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:缺血性心肌瘢痕(IMS)是冠状动脉疾病的常见后果,可能导致致命性心律失常和心力衰竭。晚期钆增强心脏磁共振(CMR)成像扫描是诊断 IMS 的基石,最近机器学习的进步使瘢痕分类得到加强。然而,这些改进的代价是密集的计算和时间需求。作为解决方案,我们建议结合轻量级预处理(LWP)和模板匹配(TM)来简化 IMS 分类:方法:使用两个卷积神经网络(CNN)和模板匹配技术对 279 名患者(151 名 IMS 患者,128 名对照组患者)的 CMR 图像进行分类,以确定是否存在 IMS。评估指标包括准确性、灵敏度、特异性、F1-分数、接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和处理时间。外部测试数据集分析包括患者级分类(PLC)和 CNN 与 TM 分类比较(CVTCC):结果:LWP 提高了 CNN(4.9 倍)和 TM(21.9 倍)的速度。此外,在没有 LWP 的情况下,TM 比 CNN 快 10 倍以上,而有了 LWP 后,TM 则快 100 倍以上。此外,TM 在准确度、灵敏度、特异性、F1 分数和 AUROC 方面的表现与 CNN 相似,而 PLC 在所有五个指标上都有所改进。此外,CVTCC 的一致性也达到了 90.9%:我们的研究结果凸显了 LWP 和 TM 在简化 IMS 分类方面的有效性。预计对 LWP 的兴趣区域 (ROI) 隔离和 TM 的 ROI 目标定位的改进有望提高准确性,使其成为 IMS 分类中 CNN 的潜在替代品,这也支持了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lightweight preprocessing and template matching facilitate streamlined ischemic myocardial scar classification.

Purpose: Ischemic myocardial scarring (IMS) is a common outcome of coronary artery disease that potentially leads to lethal arrythmias and heart failure. Late-gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging scans have served as the diagnostic bedrock for IMS, with recent advancements in machine learning enabling enhanced scar classification. However, the trade-off for these improvements is intensive computational and time demands. As a solution, we propose a combination of lightweight preprocessing (LWP) and template matching (TM) to streamline IMS classification.

Approach: CMR images from 279 patients (151 IMS, 128 control) were classified for IMS presence using two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and TM, both with and without LWP. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and processing time. External testing dataset analysis encompassed patient-level classifications (PLCs) and a CNN versus TM classification comparison (CVTCC).

Results: LWP enhanced the speed of both CNNs (4.9x) and TM (21.9x). Furthermore, in the absence of LWP, TM outpaced CNNs by over 10x, while with LWP, TM was more than 100x faster. Additionally, TM performed similarly to the CNNs in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUROC, with PLCs demonstrating improvements across all five metrics. Moreover, the CVTCC revealed a substantial 90.9% agreement.

Conclusions: Our results highlight the effectiveness of LWP and TM in streamlining IMS classification. Anticipated enhancements to LWP's region of interest (ROI) isolation and TM's ROI targeting are expected to boost accuracy, positioning them as a potential alternative to CNNs for IMS classification, supporting the need for further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信