[特应性瘙痒共识会议(AICOM)关于瘙痒评估的建议]。

Q4 Medicine
Toshiya Ebata, Yukihiro Ohya, Yusei Ohshima, Tsugunobu Andoh, Mitsutoshi Tominaga, Yoko Kataoka, Yoshinori Fukui, Nobuyuki Ebihara, Shunji Hasegawa, Shigetoshi Kobayashi, Yutaka Morisawa, Norihiro Inoue, Masami Narita, Sakae Kaneko, Ken Igawa, Takeshi Nakahara, Yozo Ishiuji, Takaharu Okada, Masanori Fujii, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Hiroyuki Irie, Miho Shiratori-Hayashi, Hiroyuki Murota
{"title":"[特应性瘙痒共识会议(AICOM)关于瘙痒评估的建议]。","authors":"Toshiya Ebata, Yukihiro Ohya, Yusei Ohshima, Tsugunobu Andoh, Mitsutoshi Tominaga, Yoko Kataoka, Yoshinori Fukui, Nobuyuki Ebihara, Shunji Hasegawa, Shigetoshi Kobayashi, Yutaka Morisawa, Norihiro Inoue, Masami Narita, Sakae Kaneko, Ken Igawa, Takeshi Nakahara, Yozo Ishiuji, Takaharu Okada, Masanori Fujii, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Hiroyuki Irie, Miho Shiratori-Hayashi, Hiroyuki Murota","doi":"10.15036/arerugi.73.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":35521,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","volume":"73 2","pages":"171-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[RECOMMENDATION FOR ITCH ASSESSMENT FROM THE ATOPIC ITCH CONSENSUS MEETING (AICOM)].\",\"authors\":\"Toshiya Ebata, Yukihiro Ohya, Yusei Ohshima, Tsugunobu Andoh, Mitsutoshi Tominaga, Yoko Kataoka, Yoshinori Fukui, Nobuyuki Ebihara, Shunji Hasegawa, Shigetoshi Kobayashi, Yutaka Morisawa, Norihiro Inoue, Masami Narita, Sakae Kaneko, Ken Igawa, Takeshi Nakahara, Yozo Ishiuji, Takaharu Okada, Masanori Fujii, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Hiroyuki Irie, Miho Shiratori-Hayashi, Hiroyuki Murota\",\"doi\":\"10.15036/arerugi.73.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Allergology\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"171-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Allergology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15036/arerugi.73.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15036/arerugi.73.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:瘙痒是特应性皮炎最令人头疼的症状,因此必须对其进行适当的评估,以获得最佳治疗效果。在特应性瘙痒共识会议(AICOM)上,我们讨论了有关瘙痒的问题以及最合适的评估方法:方法:特应性瘙痒共识会议(AICOM)与会者起草了一份共识声明草案,讨论了各年龄组最合适的瘙痒评估方法:20 位与会者(8 位皮肤科医生、7 位儿科医生和 5 位研究人员)进行了投票,就目前最佳的瘙痒评估方法达成了共识,同意率高达 95%。对于婴儿和学龄前儿童,由于主观评估比较困难,因此为护理人员制定了瘙痒评估核对表:结论:对于瘙痒评估,我们建议患者使用评分表进行主观评估。对于婴儿和学龄前儿童,应由护理人员使用检查表进行评估,并结合医生的客观评估(如皮损)。我们预计,将来会有更多客观的瘙痒评估指数被建立起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[RECOMMENDATION FOR ITCH ASSESSMENT FROM THE ATOPIC ITCH CONSENSUS MEETING (AICOM)].

Background: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.

Methods: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.

Results: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.

Conclusion: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Allergology
Japanese Journal of Allergology Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: The Japanese Society of Allergology is made up of medical researchers and clinical physicians who share an involvement in the study of allergies and clinical immunology. Clinical subspecialties include such allergies and immune-response disorders as bronchial asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, collagen disease, allergic rhinitis, pollenosis, hives, atopic dermatitis, and immunodeficiency. However, there are many patients afflicted by other allergies as well. The Society considers all such patients and disorders within its purview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信