利用大数据、统计学和机器学习预测耐药大肠杆菌感染的出现。

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12020053
Rim Hur, Stephine Golik, Yifan She
{"title":"利用大数据、统计学和机器学习预测耐药大肠杆菌感染的出现。","authors":"Rim Hur, Stephine Golik, Yifan She","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12020053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, on average, increase the length of stay (LOS) in U.S. hospitals by 5 days, translating to approximately $15,000 per patient. We used statistical and machine-learning models to explore the relationship between antibiotic usage and antibiotic resistance over time and to predict the clinical and financial costs associated with resistant <i>E. coli</i> infections. We acquired data on antibiotic utilization and the resistance/sensitivity of 4776 microbial cultures at a Kaiser Permanente facility from April 2013 to December 2019. The ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average), neural networks, and random forest time series algorithms were employed to model antibiotic resistance trends. The models' performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The best performing model was then used to predict antibiotic resistance rates for the year 2020. The ARIMA model with cefazolin, followed by the one with cephalexin, provided the lowest RMSE and MAE values without signs of overfitting across training and test datasets. The study showed that reducing cefazolin usage could decrease the rate of resistant <i>E. coli</i> infections. Although piperacillin/tazobactam did not perform as well as cefazolin in our time series models, it performed reasonably well and, due to its broad spectrum, might be a practical target for interventions in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), at least for this particular facility. While a more generalized model could be developed with data from multiple facilities, this study acts as a framework for ASP clinicians to adopt statistical and machine-learning approaches, using region-specific data to make effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Large Data, Statistics, and Machine Learning to Predict the Emergence of Resistant <i>E. coli</i> Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Rim Hur, Stephine Golik, Yifan She\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharmacy12020053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, on average, increase the length of stay (LOS) in U.S. hospitals by 5 days, translating to approximately $15,000 per patient. We used statistical and machine-learning models to explore the relationship between antibiotic usage and antibiotic resistance over time and to predict the clinical and financial costs associated with resistant <i>E. coli</i> infections. We acquired data on antibiotic utilization and the resistance/sensitivity of 4776 microbial cultures at a Kaiser Permanente facility from April 2013 to December 2019. The ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average), neural networks, and random forest time series algorithms were employed to model antibiotic resistance trends. The models' performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The best performing model was then used to predict antibiotic resistance rates for the year 2020. The ARIMA model with cefazolin, followed by the one with cephalexin, provided the lowest RMSE and MAE values without signs of overfitting across training and test datasets. The study showed that reducing cefazolin usage could decrease the rate of resistant <i>E. coli</i> infections. Although piperacillin/tazobactam did not perform as well as cefazolin in our time series models, it performed reasonably well and, due to its broad spectrum, might be a practical target for interventions in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), at least for this particular facility. While a more generalized model could be developed with data from multiple facilities, this study acts as a framework for ASP clinicians to adopt statistical and machine-learning approaches, using region-specific data to make effective interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12020053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12020053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耐药性革兰氏阴性细菌感染平均会使美国医院的住院时间(LOS)延长 5 天,每位患者的住院费用约为 15,000 美元。我们使用统计和机器学习模型来探索抗生素使用和抗生素耐药性之间的关系,并预测耐药性大肠杆菌感染的相关临床和财务成本。我们获取了 2013 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月期间凯撒医疗机构的抗生素使用情况和 4776 个微生物培养物的耐药性/敏感性数据。我们采用了 ARIMA(自回归整合移动平均)、神经网络和随机森林时间序列算法来模拟抗生素耐药性趋势。使用平均绝对误差 (MAE) 和均方根误差 (RMSE) 对模型的性能进行评估。然后用表现最好的模型来预测 2020 年的抗生素耐药率。使用头孢唑啉的ARIMA模型和使用头孢氨苄的ARIMA模型的RMSE和MAE值都是最低的,而且在训练和测试数据集上都没有过度拟合的迹象。研究表明,减少头孢唑啉的使用可降低耐药大肠杆菌的感染率。虽然哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在时间序列模型中的表现不如头孢唑啉,但它的表现也相当不错,而且由于它的广谱性,可能会成为抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)中的一个实用干预目标,至少对该特定机构而言是如此。虽然可以利用来自多个机构的数据建立一个更具通用性的模型,但这项研究为抗菌药物管理计划的临床医生提供了一个框架,使他们能够采用统计和机器学习方法,利用特定地区的数据进行有效干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging Large Data, Statistics, and Machine Learning to Predict the Emergence of Resistant E. coli Infections.

Drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, on average, increase the length of stay (LOS) in U.S. hospitals by 5 days, translating to approximately $15,000 per patient. We used statistical and machine-learning models to explore the relationship between antibiotic usage and antibiotic resistance over time and to predict the clinical and financial costs associated with resistant E. coli infections. We acquired data on antibiotic utilization and the resistance/sensitivity of 4776 microbial cultures at a Kaiser Permanente facility from April 2013 to December 2019. The ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average), neural networks, and random forest time series algorithms were employed to model antibiotic resistance trends. The models' performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The best performing model was then used to predict antibiotic resistance rates for the year 2020. The ARIMA model with cefazolin, followed by the one with cephalexin, provided the lowest RMSE and MAE values without signs of overfitting across training and test datasets. The study showed that reducing cefazolin usage could decrease the rate of resistant E. coli infections. Although piperacillin/tazobactam did not perform as well as cefazolin in our time series models, it performed reasonably well and, due to its broad spectrum, might be a practical target for interventions in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), at least for this particular facility. While a more generalized model could be developed with data from multiple facilities, this study acts as a framework for ASP clinicians to adopt statistical and machine-learning approaches, using region-specific data to make effective interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信