利他主义、互惠和概率:通过贴现框架考察关系。

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Natalie R. Buddiga , Matthew L. Locey
{"title":"利他主义、互惠和概率:通过贴现框架考察关系。","authors":"Natalie R. Buddiga ,&nbsp;Matthew L. Locey","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Probability and reciprocation have been implicated as key variables for understanding altruism and cooperation. Social discounting, which describes the decline in reward value as the recipient increases in social distance, has provided a framework through which to examine altruistic and cooperative choice. A previous study introduced reciprocal discounting as a way of studying perceived altruism from others (termed <em>reciprocal altruism</em>). But probability discounting has not yet been examined in relation to reciprocal discounting. In order to extend research on reciprocal discounting, the present study evaluated correlations between social, reciprocal, and probability discounting as well as relations between standard social distance (used in social discounting) and reciprocal social distance (the participant’s perceived social distance placement on someone else’s list) among 129 participants. Upon evaluation, the fit of median reciprocal discount rates to the hyperbolic form was replicated. A strong correlation between social and reciprocal discount rates and a moderate correlation between social and probability discount rates were found as well. Additionally, reciprocal and probability discount rates yielded moderate correlations while reciprocal and standard social distance analyses revealed more correspondence between reward values when persons were socially close (i.e., Person 1) or socially distant (i.e., Person 100). This study provides further evidence that reciprocation and probability likely impact altruistic choice while laying groundwork for further investigations into social distance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altruism, reciprocity, and probability: Examining relations through a discounting framework\",\"authors\":\"Natalie R. Buddiga ,&nbsp;Matthew L. Locey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Probability and reciprocation have been implicated as key variables for understanding altruism and cooperation. Social discounting, which describes the decline in reward value as the recipient increases in social distance, has provided a framework through which to examine altruistic and cooperative choice. A previous study introduced reciprocal discounting as a way of studying perceived altruism from others (termed <em>reciprocal altruism</em>). But probability discounting has not yet been examined in relation to reciprocal discounting. In order to extend research on reciprocal discounting, the present study evaluated correlations between social, reciprocal, and probability discounting as well as relations between standard social distance (used in social discounting) and reciprocal social distance (the participant’s perceived social distance placement on someone else’s list) among 129 participants. Upon evaluation, the fit of median reciprocal discount rates to the hyperbolic form was replicated. A strong correlation between social and reciprocal discount rates and a moderate correlation between social and probability discount rates were found as well. Additionally, reciprocal and probability discount rates yielded moderate correlations while reciprocal and standard social distance analyses revealed more correspondence between reward values when persons were socially close (i.e., Person 1) or socially distant (i.e., Person 100). This study provides further evidence that reciprocation and probability likely impact altruistic choice while laying groundwork for further investigations into social distance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724000391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724000391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

概率和互惠被认为是理解利他主义与合作的关键变量。社会折扣描述了随着社会距离的增加,受助者的回报价值会下降,它为研究利他主义和合作选择提供了一个框架。之前的一项研究引入了互惠折扣,作为研究感知到的他人利他主义(称为互惠利他主义)的一种方法。但概率折扣尚未与互惠折扣联系起来进行研究。为了扩展对互惠折扣的研究,本研究评估了 129 名参与者的社会折扣、互惠折扣和概率折扣之间的相关性,以及标准社会距离(用于社会折扣)和互惠社会距离(参与者感知到的社会距离在他人名单上的位置)之间的关系。经过评估,中位互惠折扣率与双曲线形式的拟合得到了复制。社会折扣率和互惠折扣率之间存在很强的相关性,社会折扣率和概率折扣率之间也存在中等程度的相关性。此外,互惠折扣率和概率折扣率产生了中等程度的相关性,而互惠和标准社会距离分析表明,当人与人之间的社会距离较近(即 1 号人)或较远(即 100 号人)时,奖励值之间的对应性更高。这项研究进一步证明了互惠和概率可能会影响利他主义选择,同时也为进一步研究社会距离奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Altruism, reciprocity, and probability: Examining relations through a discounting framework

Probability and reciprocation have been implicated as key variables for understanding altruism and cooperation. Social discounting, which describes the decline in reward value as the recipient increases in social distance, has provided a framework through which to examine altruistic and cooperative choice. A previous study introduced reciprocal discounting as a way of studying perceived altruism from others (termed reciprocal altruism). But probability discounting has not yet been examined in relation to reciprocal discounting. In order to extend research on reciprocal discounting, the present study evaluated correlations between social, reciprocal, and probability discounting as well as relations between standard social distance (used in social discounting) and reciprocal social distance (the participant’s perceived social distance placement on someone else’s list) among 129 participants. Upon evaluation, the fit of median reciprocal discount rates to the hyperbolic form was replicated. A strong correlation between social and reciprocal discount rates and a moderate correlation between social and probability discount rates were found as well. Additionally, reciprocal and probability discount rates yielded moderate correlations while reciprocal and standard social distance analyses revealed more correspondence between reward values when persons were socially close (i.e., Person 1) or socially distant (i.e., Person 100). This study provides further evidence that reciprocation and probability likely impact altruistic choice while laying groundwork for further investigations into social distance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信