项目化科学政策背景下的稳定性与灵活性：科学顾问的作用是什么？

IF 2.6 4区管理学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1093/scipol/scae009

Peeter Vihma

{"title":"项目化科学政策背景下的稳定性与灵活性：科学顾问的作用是什么？","authors":"Peeter Vihma","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science–policy interaction is frequently organized through projects, lauded as flexible and focused administrative solutions for policy learning. However, there is a risk of stifling projects with overly rigid interfaces or, controversially, losing project results amidst the cracks of inter- and intra-organizational cleavages when interfaces are excessively flexible. This article examines how science advisors in Estonian ministries contributed to resolving this controversy through an in-depth case study of an agenda-setting bioeconomy project. The results suggest that the potential of science advisors to provide necessary flexibility is contingent on their position relative to bureaucratic hierarchies and boundary objects.","PeriodicalId":47975,"journal":{"name":"Science and Public Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability versus flexibility in projectified science–policy context: what is the role of science advisors?\",\"authors\":\"Peeter Vihma\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/scipol/scae009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science–policy interaction is frequently organized through projects, lauded as flexible and focused administrative solutions for policy learning. However, there is a risk of stifling projects with overly rigid interfaces or, controversially, losing project results amidst the cracks of inter- and intra-organizational cleavages when interfaces are excessively flexible. This article examines how science advisors in Estonian ministries contributed to resolving this controversy through an in-depth case study of an agenda-setting bioeconomy project. The results suggest that the potential of science advisors to provide necessary flexibility is contingent on their position relative to bureaucratic hierarchies and boundary objects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

科学与政策之间的互动经常是通过项目来组织的，项目被誉为政策学习的灵活而有针对性的行政解决方案。然而，过于僵化的接口有可能会扼杀项目，或者，当接口过于灵活时，有可能在组织间和组织内的裂缝中失去项目成果。本文通过对一个制定议程的生物经济项目的深入案例研究，探讨了爱沙尼亚各部委的科学顾问如何为解决这一争议做出贡献。研究结果表明，科学顾问提供必要灵活性的潜力取决于他们相对于官僚等级制度和边界对象的地位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Stability versus flexibility in projectified science–policy context: what is the role of science advisors?

Science–policy interaction is frequently organized through projects, lauded as flexible and focused administrative solutions for policy learning. However, there is a risk of stifling projects with overly rigid interfaces or, controversially, losing project results amidst the cracks of inter- and intra-organizational cleavages when interfaces are excessively flexible. This article examines how science advisors in Estonian ministries contributed to resolving this controversy through an in-depth case study of an agenda-setting bioeconomy project. The results suggest that the potential of science advisors to provide necessary flexibility is contingent on their position relative to bureaucratic hierarchies and boundary objects.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Science and Public Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Science and Public Policy is a leading refereed, international journal on public policies for science, technology and innovation, and on their implications for other public policies. It covers basic, applied, high, low, and any other types of S&T, and rich or poorer countries. It is read in around 70 countries, in universities (teaching and research), government ministries and agencies, consultancies, industry and elsewhere.