{"title":"深入我们的皮肤:Lisa T. Sarasohn 著的《害虫的文化和社会史》(评论)","authors":"Michelle Webb","doi":"10.1353/bhm.2023.a922716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin</em> by Lisa T. Sarasohn <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Michelle Webb </li> </ul> Lisa T. Sarasohn. <em>Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xii + 280 pp. Ill. $30.00 (978-1-4214-4138-2). <p>There are not many historical monographs that combine subject matter as diverse as Thomas Becket's mortification of his flesh, Charles Darwin's theories about lice, and Donald Trump's insults toward Bernie Sanders. Lisa T. Sarasohn's latest work covers all of this ground and more, encompassing everything from Christina of Sweden shooting fleas from a tiny cannon to the atrocities of the Holocaust. The unifying theme here is vermin, the despised creatures that have historically infested bodies and homes. But this work addresses not just responses to the bites, foul odors, and diseases that these creatures have inflicted upon humanity. Instead Sarasohn has produced a compelling and convincing account of how those who wish to denigrate their enemies have customarily accused them of either hosting and spreading vermin, or of actually being vermin. This is a history of rats and fleas and of prophylactic ointments made from roasted cats, but it is also a history of gas chambers made to resemble delousing showers. It is the history of othering, of racism and xenophobia, of class-based prejudice, and of the fear of the filthy other.</p> <p>Sarasohn has ordered her huge range of material within a strict taxonomical and chronological framework. Bedbugs, fleas, lice, and rats are assigned two chapters each, one concentrating upon the premodern period, the other upon the modern world. Each section would be entirely comprehensible if read in isolation, but the cumulative effect is impressive and reveals the extent to which this apparently niche area of scholarship is nothing of the sort. In addition to being able to trace the development of a particularly pernicious strain of dehumanization, this book also enables the reader to gain insight into both changing views of the human body and changing expectations of what that body should be expected to endure. By drawing attention to such areas as early modern acceptance of bedbug bites (only their smell was believed intolerable), Sarasohn traces how and when being infested became both personally and socially unacceptable. The increasing assumption among at least part of the population that it should be possible to be physically comfortable at will is made visible here, and I would argue that this is part of the history of how the elite withdrew or attempted to withdraw from popular culture, in this case that culture being expressed primarily through itching.</p> <p><em>Getting Under Our Skin</em> is based upon extensive familiarity with the relevant historiography, and the text is meticulously annotated. It also utilizes a prodigious number of primary sources, many of them personally authored accounts of interactions with vermin or with individuals classified as vermin. A range of literary and visual sources are also put to good use. Everyone from Charles I to Fox News is here, merrily dehumanizing their enemies through the rhetoric of <strong>[End Page 641]</strong> infestation. We learn about Samuel Pepys, who found bedbugs funny but objected to lice, and Beatrix Potter, whose fondness for animals encompassed rats but not bedbugs. Familiar works by John Donne and William Blake are accompanied by lesser-known contributions to the literature of vermin, such as poet Isaac Rosenberg's account of the lice-ridden trenches of World War I. The visual sources reproduced in the text range from the well-known images of fleas and lice as seen through early microscopes in Robert Hooke's <em>Micrographia</em>, which Sarasohn credits with initially sparking her interest in this subject, to an alarmingly cheerful 1940s advertisement for DDT-infused nursery wallpaper. All human life is here, and much of it is busy scratching.</p> <p>In this work Sarasohn has taken a seemingly peripheral area of subject matter and convincingly argued for its centrality to European and North American culture. The history of being bitten might initially appear inconsequential, but the history of dehumanization is anything but. Few readers of <em>Getting Under Our Skin</em> will ever skip over the word \"lousy\" in a primary...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":55304,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin by Lisa T. Sarasohn (review)\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/bhm.2023.a922716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin</em> by Lisa T. Sarasohn <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Michelle Webb </li> </ul> Lisa T. Sarasohn. <em>Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin</em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xii + 280 pp. Ill. $30.00 (978-1-4214-4138-2). <p>There are not many historical monographs that combine subject matter as diverse as Thomas Becket's mortification of his flesh, Charles Darwin's theories about lice, and Donald Trump's insults toward Bernie Sanders. Lisa T. Sarasohn's latest work covers all of this ground and more, encompassing everything from Christina of Sweden shooting fleas from a tiny cannon to the atrocities of the Holocaust. The unifying theme here is vermin, the despised creatures that have historically infested bodies and homes. But this work addresses not just responses to the bites, foul odors, and diseases that these creatures have inflicted upon humanity. Instead Sarasohn has produced a compelling and convincing account of how those who wish to denigrate their enemies have customarily accused them of either hosting and spreading vermin, or of actually being vermin. This is a history of rats and fleas and of prophylactic ointments made from roasted cats, but it is also a history of gas chambers made to resemble delousing showers. It is the history of othering, of racism and xenophobia, of class-based prejudice, and of the fear of the filthy other.</p> <p>Sarasohn has ordered her huge range of material within a strict taxonomical and chronological framework. Bedbugs, fleas, lice, and rats are assigned two chapters each, one concentrating upon the premodern period, the other upon the modern world. Each section would be entirely comprehensible if read in isolation, but the cumulative effect is impressive and reveals the extent to which this apparently niche area of scholarship is nothing of the sort. In addition to being able to trace the development of a particularly pernicious strain of dehumanization, this book also enables the reader to gain insight into both changing views of the human body and changing expectations of what that body should be expected to endure. By drawing attention to such areas as early modern acceptance of bedbug bites (only their smell was believed intolerable), Sarasohn traces how and when being infested became both personally and socially unacceptable. The increasing assumption among at least part of the population that it should be possible to be physically comfortable at will is made visible here, and I would argue that this is part of the history of how the elite withdrew or attempted to withdraw from popular culture, in this case that culture being expressed primarily through itching.</p> <p><em>Getting Under Our Skin</em> is based upon extensive familiarity with the relevant historiography, and the text is meticulously annotated. It also utilizes a prodigious number of primary sources, many of them personally authored accounts of interactions with vermin or with individuals classified as vermin. A range of literary and visual sources are also put to good use. Everyone from Charles I to Fox News is here, merrily dehumanizing their enemies through the rhetoric of <strong>[End Page 641]</strong> infestation. We learn about Samuel Pepys, who found bedbugs funny but objected to lice, and Beatrix Potter, whose fondness for animals encompassed rats but not bedbugs. Familiar works by John Donne and William Blake are accompanied by lesser-known contributions to the literature of vermin, such as poet Isaac Rosenberg's account of the lice-ridden trenches of World War I. The visual sources reproduced in the text range from the well-known images of fleas and lice as seen through early microscopes in Robert Hooke's <em>Micrographia</em>, which Sarasohn credits with initially sparking her interest in this subject, to an alarmingly cheerful 1940s advertisement for DDT-infused nursery wallpaper. All human life is here, and much of it is busy scratching.</p> <p>In this work Sarasohn has taken a seemingly peripheral area of subject matter and convincingly argued for its centrality to European and North American culture. The history of being bitten might initially appear inconsequential, but the history of dehumanization is anything but. Few readers of <em>Getting Under Our Skin</em> will ever skip over the word \\\"lousy\\\" in a primary...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the History of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the History of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2023.a922716\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2023.a922716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
评论者: 深入我们的皮肤:Lisa T. Sarasohn 著 Michelle Webb Lisa T. Sarasohn 译《害虫的文化和社会史》。深入我们的皮肤:害虫的文化和社会史》。巴尔的摩:约翰-霍普金斯大学出版社,2021 年。xii + 280 pp.插图,30.00 美元(978-1-4214-4138-2)。将托马斯-贝克特(Thomas Becket)对肉体的折磨、查尔斯-达尔文(Charles Darwin)关于虱子的理论以及唐纳德-特朗普(Donald Trump)对伯尼-桑德斯(Bernie Sanders)的侮辱等不同主题结合在一起的历史专著并不多。丽莎-T.-萨拉松的最新作品涵盖了所有这些内容,甚至更多,从瑞典的克里斯蒂娜用小炮射击跳蚤到大屠杀的暴行,无所不包。这里的统一主题是害虫,即历史上侵扰人体和家庭的被鄙视的生物。但是,这部作品所涉及的不仅仅是对这些生物给人类带来的叮咬、恶臭和疾病的反应。相反,萨拉松以令人信服的方式讲述了那些想要诋毁敌人的人是如何习惯性地指责敌人是害虫的寄生者和传播者,或者实际上就是害虫。这是一部关于老鼠和跳蚤以及用烤猫制成的预防药膏的历史,但也是一部将毒气室改造成类似除虱淋浴的历史。这是一部他者化、种族主义和仇外心理、基于阶级的偏见以及对肮脏的他者的恐惧的历史。萨拉松在严格的分类学和年代学框架内整理了她的大量资料。臭虫、跳蚤、虱子和老鼠各占两章,一章集中介绍前现代时期,另一章介绍现代世界。如果单独阅读,每个章节都完全可以理解,但累积起来的效果却令人印象深刻,并揭示了这一看似小众的学术领域在多大程度上并非如此。除了能够追溯一种特别有害的非人化现象的发展历程,本书还能让读者深入了解对人体不断变化的看法,以及对人体所应承受的不断变化的期望。萨拉森提请读者注意现代早期人们对臭虫叮咬的接受程度(人们认为只有臭虫的气味令人无法忍受),并追溯了被臭虫叮咬是如何以及何时成为个人和社会所无法接受的。在这里,我们可以看到,至少有一部分人越来越多地认为,身体上的舒适应该是可以随心所欲的,我认为这是精英阶层如何退出或试图退出大众文化的历史的一部分,在这种情况下,这种文化主要是通过瘙痒来表现的。Getting Under Our Skin》基于对相关史料的广泛了解,并对文本进行了细致的注释。此外,该书还利用了大量原始资料,其中许多都是个人撰写的与害虫或被归类为害虫的人的互动记录。一系列文学和视觉资料也得到了很好的利用。从查理一世到福克斯新闻,每个人都在这里,通过[第 641 页完]侵扰的修辞手法,快乐地将他们的敌人非人化。我们了解到塞缪尔-佩皮斯(Samuel Pepys),他觉得臭虫很有趣,但反对虱子;我们还了解到比阿特丽克斯-波特(Beatrix Potter),她喜欢的动物包括老鼠,但不包括臭虫。约翰-多恩(John Donne)和威廉-布莱克(William Blake)的作品耳熟能详,但也有一些鲜为人知的害虫文学作品,如诗人艾萨克-罗森伯格(Isaac Rosenberg)对第一次世界大战中虱子横行的战壕的描述。文本中再现的视觉资料包括罗伯特-胡克(Robert Hooke)的《显微绘图法》(Micrographia)中通过早期显微镜看到的跳蚤和虱子的著名图像(萨拉森认为是该书激发了她对这一主题的兴趣),以及 20 世纪 40 年代令人震惊的使用滴滴涕的幼儿园壁纸广告。所有的人类生活都在这里,其中大部分都在忙着抓挠。在这部作品中,萨拉松从一个看似边缘的主题领域出发,令人信服地论证了它在欧洲和北美文化中的核心地位。被咬的历史最初似乎无关紧要,但非人化的历史却并非如此。很少有《深入我们的皮肤》一书的读者会跳过初级读本中的 "糟糕 "一词。
Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin by Lisa T. Sarasohn (review)
Reviewed by:
Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin by Lisa T. Sarasohn
Michelle Webb
Lisa T. Sarasohn. Getting Under Our Skin: The Cultural and Social History of Vermin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. xii + 280 pp. Ill. $30.00 (978-1-4214-4138-2).
There are not many historical monographs that combine subject matter as diverse as Thomas Becket's mortification of his flesh, Charles Darwin's theories about lice, and Donald Trump's insults toward Bernie Sanders. Lisa T. Sarasohn's latest work covers all of this ground and more, encompassing everything from Christina of Sweden shooting fleas from a tiny cannon to the atrocities of the Holocaust. The unifying theme here is vermin, the despised creatures that have historically infested bodies and homes. But this work addresses not just responses to the bites, foul odors, and diseases that these creatures have inflicted upon humanity. Instead Sarasohn has produced a compelling and convincing account of how those who wish to denigrate their enemies have customarily accused them of either hosting and spreading vermin, or of actually being vermin. This is a history of rats and fleas and of prophylactic ointments made from roasted cats, but it is also a history of gas chambers made to resemble delousing showers. It is the history of othering, of racism and xenophobia, of class-based prejudice, and of the fear of the filthy other.
Sarasohn has ordered her huge range of material within a strict taxonomical and chronological framework. Bedbugs, fleas, lice, and rats are assigned two chapters each, one concentrating upon the premodern period, the other upon the modern world. Each section would be entirely comprehensible if read in isolation, but the cumulative effect is impressive and reveals the extent to which this apparently niche area of scholarship is nothing of the sort. In addition to being able to trace the development of a particularly pernicious strain of dehumanization, this book also enables the reader to gain insight into both changing views of the human body and changing expectations of what that body should be expected to endure. By drawing attention to such areas as early modern acceptance of bedbug bites (only their smell was believed intolerable), Sarasohn traces how and when being infested became both personally and socially unacceptable. The increasing assumption among at least part of the population that it should be possible to be physically comfortable at will is made visible here, and I would argue that this is part of the history of how the elite withdrew or attempted to withdraw from popular culture, in this case that culture being expressed primarily through itching.
Getting Under Our Skin is based upon extensive familiarity with the relevant historiography, and the text is meticulously annotated. It also utilizes a prodigious number of primary sources, many of them personally authored accounts of interactions with vermin or with individuals classified as vermin. A range of literary and visual sources are also put to good use. Everyone from Charles I to Fox News is here, merrily dehumanizing their enemies through the rhetoric of [End Page 641] infestation. We learn about Samuel Pepys, who found bedbugs funny but objected to lice, and Beatrix Potter, whose fondness for animals encompassed rats but not bedbugs. Familiar works by John Donne and William Blake are accompanied by lesser-known contributions to the literature of vermin, such as poet Isaac Rosenberg's account of the lice-ridden trenches of World War I. The visual sources reproduced in the text range from the well-known images of fleas and lice as seen through early microscopes in Robert Hooke's Micrographia, which Sarasohn credits with initially sparking her interest in this subject, to an alarmingly cheerful 1940s advertisement for DDT-infused nursery wallpaper. All human life is here, and much of it is busy scratching.
In this work Sarasohn has taken a seemingly peripheral area of subject matter and convincingly argued for its centrality to European and North American culture. The history of being bitten might initially appear inconsequential, but the history of dehumanization is anything but. Few readers of Getting Under Our Skin will ever skip over the word "lousy" in a primary...
期刊介绍:
A leading journal in its field for more than three quarters of a century, the Bulletin spans the social, cultural, and scientific aspects of the history of medicine worldwide. Every issue includes reviews of recent books on medical history. Recurring sections include Digital Humanities & Public History and Pedagogy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine is the official publication of the American Association for the History of Medicine (AAHM) and the Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine.