正多面体欧几里得时代的绘图与计算

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 0 ARCHITECTURE
Sylvie Duvernoy
{"title":"正多面体欧几里得时代的绘图与计算","authors":"Sylvie Duvernoy","doi":"10.1007/s00004-024-00772-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Can we compute what we cannot draw? How must we draw to produce measurable representations, or visual ones? This research inquires into the relationship between mathematics and figurative representation, and more precisely between drawing and computation. The scientific imagery studied here is the representation of the five platonic solids, discussing various representation techniques from classical antiquity to modern times, and their efficacy to help calculate sizes and proportional ratios. Scholars in history of architectural drawing have too often limited their observations to the very few preserved plans and front views dating back to classical antiquity, without enlarging their investigation to other scientific fields that also rely on drawing as a research tool and communication device. Among these other fields stands the mathematical research, especially solid geometry which deals with objects and entities that have shapes that needs to be somehow drawn in 3D to be studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":54719,"journal":{"name":"Nexus Network Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Regular Polyhedra: Drawing and Computing in Euclid’s day\",\"authors\":\"Sylvie Duvernoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00004-024-00772-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Can we compute what we cannot draw? How must we draw to produce measurable representations, or visual ones? This research inquires into the relationship between mathematics and figurative representation, and more precisely between drawing and computation. The scientific imagery studied here is the representation of the five platonic solids, discussing various representation techniques from classical antiquity to modern times, and their efficacy to help calculate sizes and proportional ratios. Scholars in history of architectural drawing have too often limited their observations to the very few preserved plans and front views dating back to classical antiquity, without enlarging their investigation to other scientific fields that also rely on drawing as a research tool and communication device. Among these other fields stands the mathematical research, especially solid geometry which deals with objects and entities that have shapes that needs to be somehow drawn in 3D to be studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nexus Network Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nexus Network Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-024-00772-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nexus Network Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-024-00772-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们能计算我们无法绘制的东西吗?我们必须如何绘画才能产生可测量的表象或视觉表象?本研究探究数学与具象表征之间的关系,更确切地说,是绘图与计算之间的关系。本文研究的科学意象是五个柏拉图实体的表现形式,讨论从古典古代到现代的各种表现技法,以及它们在帮助计算尺寸和比例比率方面的功效。研究建筑绘图史的学者往往将他们的观察局限于极少数保存下来的可追溯到古典古代的平面图和正视图,而没有将他们的研究扩大到同样依赖绘图作为研究工具和交流手段的其他科学领域。在这些其他领域中,数学研究,尤其是实体几何学,涉及到需要以某种方式绘制成三维图形才能研究的物体和实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Regular Polyhedra: Drawing and Computing in Euclid’s day

The Regular Polyhedra: Drawing and Computing in Euclid’s day

Can we compute what we cannot draw? How must we draw to produce measurable representations, or visual ones? This research inquires into the relationship between mathematics and figurative representation, and more precisely between drawing and computation. The scientific imagery studied here is the representation of the five platonic solids, discussing various representation techniques from classical antiquity to modern times, and their efficacy to help calculate sizes and proportional ratios. Scholars in history of architectural drawing have too often limited their observations to the very few preserved plans and front views dating back to classical antiquity, without enlarging their investigation to other scientific fields that also rely on drawing as a research tool and communication device. Among these other fields stands the mathematical research, especially solid geometry which deals with objects and entities that have shapes that needs to be somehow drawn in 3D to be studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nexus Network Journal
Nexus Network Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1999, the Nexus Network Journal (NNJ) is a peer-reviewed journal for researchers, professionals and students engaged in the study of the application of mathematical principles to architectural design. Its goal is to present the broadest possible consideration of all aspects of the relationships between architecture and mathematics, including landscape architecture and urban design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信