IPACK 阻滞对全膝关节置换术后急性疼痛治疗的疗效:综述。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Pain and Headache Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1007/s11916-024-01237-3
William C Upshaw, John M Richey, Joseph P Tassin, Mark V Frolov, Benjamin C Miller, Aaron J Kaye, Jeffrey Sterritt, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Alan D Kaye
{"title":"IPACK 阻滞对全膝关节置换术后急性疼痛治疗的疗效:综述。","authors":"William C Upshaw, John M Richey, Joseph P Tassin, Mark V Frolov, Benjamin C Miller, Aaron J Kaye, Jeffrey Sterritt, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Alan D Kaye","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01237-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Patients often experience a significant degree of knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR). To alleviate this pain, nerve blocks may be performed such as the adductor canal block (ACB). However, ACBs are unable to relieve pain originating from the posterior region of the knee. A new type of nerve block known as the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with ACBs as it is designed to inhibit nerve branches innervating this area. In this article, we examine the rationale behind the IPACK procedure, how it is performed, and clinical trials examining its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>5 of the 7 clinical trials examined in this article showed the IPACK + ACB block to show superior efficacy in treating pain following TKR compared to other blocks. These blocks included PMDI+ACB, SPANK+ACB, PAI+ACB, ACB alone, and SCAB. 2 of the 7 clinical trials showed the IPACK + ACB to be less effective in managing patients pain following TKR compared to other blocks which included the CACB and 4 in 1 block. In most instances, the IPACK + ACB showed superior efficacy in managing patients' pain following TKR when compared to other types of nerve blocks. This was determined by measuring usage of opioids, reported postoperative pain, and length of hospital stays following TKR. Thus, we suppose the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with the ACB to effectively reduce patient's pain following TKR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":" ","pages":"673-679"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IPACK Block Efficacy for Acute Pain Management after Total Knee Replacement: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"William C Upshaw, John M Richey, Joseph P Tassin, Mark V Frolov, Benjamin C Miller, Aaron J Kaye, Jeffrey Sterritt, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Alan D Kaye\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11916-024-01237-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Patients often experience a significant degree of knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR). To alleviate this pain, nerve blocks may be performed such as the adductor canal block (ACB). However, ACBs are unable to relieve pain originating from the posterior region of the knee. A new type of nerve block known as the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with ACBs as it is designed to inhibit nerve branches innervating this area. In this article, we examine the rationale behind the IPACK procedure, how it is performed, and clinical trials examining its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>5 of the 7 clinical trials examined in this article showed the IPACK + ACB block to show superior efficacy in treating pain following TKR compared to other blocks. These blocks included PMDI+ACB, SPANK+ACB, PAI+ACB, ACB alone, and SCAB. 2 of the 7 clinical trials showed the IPACK + ACB to be less effective in managing patients pain following TKR compared to other blocks which included the CACB and 4 in 1 block. In most instances, the IPACK + ACB showed superior efficacy in managing patients' pain following TKR when compared to other types of nerve blocks. This was determined by measuring usage of opioids, reported postoperative pain, and length of hospital stays following TKR. Thus, we suppose the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with the ACB to effectively reduce patient's pain following TKR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"673-679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01237-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01237-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:全膝关节置换术(TKR)后,患者常常会感到膝关节疼痛。为缓解这种疼痛,可进行神经阻滞,如内收肌管阻滞(ACB)。但是,内收肌阻滞无法缓解源自膝关节后部的疼痛。一种被称为 IPACK 阻滞的新型神经阻滞可与 ACB 结合使用,因为 IPACK 阻滞旨在抑制支配该区域的神经分支。在本文中,我们将探讨 IPACK 阻滞术的原理、实施方法以及研究其疗效的临床试验:本文研究的 7 项临床试验中有 5 项显示,IPACK + ACB 阻滞在治疗 TKR 后疼痛方面的疗效优于其他阻滞。这些阻滞包括 PMDI+ACB、SPANK+ACB、PAI+ACB、单纯 ACB 和 SCAB。7 项临床试验中有 2 项显示,与其他阻滞(包括 CACB 和 4 合 1 阻滞)相比,IPACK + ACB 在治疗患者 TKR 术后疼痛方面的效果较差。在大多数情况下,与其他类型的神经阻滞相比,IPACK + ACB 在治疗患者接受 TKR 后的疼痛方面显示出更高的疗效。这是在测量阿片类药物的使用量、术后疼痛报告和 TKR 术后住院时间后得出的结论。因此,我们认为 IPACK 阻滞可与 ACB 结合使用,以有效减轻 TKR 术后患者的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IPACK Block Efficacy for Acute Pain Management after Total Knee Replacement: A Review.

Purpose of review: Patients often experience a significant degree of knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR). To alleviate this pain, nerve blocks may be performed such as the adductor canal block (ACB). However, ACBs are unable to relieve pain originating from the posterior region of the knee. A new type of nerve block known as the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with ACBs as it is designed to inhibit nerve branches innervating this area. In this article, we examine the rationale behind the IPACK procedure, how it is performed, and clinical trials examining its efficacy.

Recent findings: 5 of the 7 clinical trials examined in this article showed the IPACK + ACB block to show superior efficacy in treating pain following TKR compared to other blocks. These blocks included PMDI+ACB, SPANK+ACB, PAI+ACB, ACB alone, and SCAB. 2 of the 7 clinical trials showed the IPACK + ACB to be less effective in managing patients pain following TKR compared to other blocks which included the CACB and 4 in 1 block. In most instances, the IPACK + ACB showed superior efficacy in managing patients' pain following TKR when compared to other types of nerve blocks. This was determined by measuring usage of opioids, reported postoperative pain, and length of hospital stays following TKR. Thus, we suppose the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with the ACB to effectively reduce patient's pain following TKR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信