健康的社会决定因素与 COVID-19 住院康复后的恢复。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13141
Hannah Martin, Christopher Lewis, Sean Dreyer, Juliana Couri, Sanchita Sen, Prakash Jayabalan
{"title":"健康的社会决定因素与 COVID-19 住院康复后的恢复。","authors":"Hannah Martin, Christopher Lewis, Sean Dreyer, Juliana Couri, Sanchita Sen, Prakash Jayabalan","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection can have long-term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long-term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine SDOH factors related to long-term independence and QoL of COVID-19 patients after IRF stay.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multisite cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two urban IRFs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures were Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post-IRF stay for severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF-36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥$70,000, p = .004), and living in the city (p = .046). Similarly, patients who were of the male gender (p = .004) and had higher income (≥$70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow-up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow-up care reported lower SF-36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long-term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID-19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"966-972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social determinants of health and COVID-19 recovery after inpatient rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Martin, Christopher Lewis, Sean Dreyer, Juliana Couri, Sanchita Sen, Prakash Jayabalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection can have long-term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long-term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine SDOH factors related to long-term independence and QoL of COVID-19 patients after IRF stay.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multisite cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two urban IRFs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures were Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post-IRF stay for severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF-36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥$70,000, p = .004), and living in the city (p = .046). Similarly, patients who were of the male gender (p = .004) and had higher income (≥$70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow-up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow-up care reported lower SF-36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long-term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID-19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"966-972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13141\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)风险因素较多的社区,COVID-19 的感染率、发病率和死亡率都较高。严重感染 COVID-19 的患者会出现长期功能障碍,导致生活质量(QoL)和独立性降低。研究表明,这些患者从入住住院康复设施(IRF)中获益匪浅,但目前仍缺乏对患者返回家庭环境后康复的长期益处的研究:目的:确定与COVID-19患者在IRF住院后的长期独立性和QoL相关的SDOH因素:设计:多地点横断面调查:主要结果测量:主要结果指标:主要结果指标为COVID后功能状态量表(PCFS)和SF-36短表(SF-36)评分。次要结果为在IRF期间的质量指标(QI)得分和医疗服务获取情况问卷。结果采用方差分析和多变量逻辑回归分析进行分析:因重症 COVID-19 在 IRF 住院超过 1 年的参与者(n = 48)参加了研究。SF-36 评分较高与男性(p = .002)、收入较高(≥ 70,000 美元,p = .004)和居住在城市(p = .046)有关。同样,男性(p = .004)和收入较高(≥70,000 美元,p = .04)的患者在 PCFS 中得 0 分或 1 分的几率更大。年龄与差异无关。女性更有可能寻求后续治疗(p = .014)。寻求后续治疗者的 SF-36 总分和情绪健康得分较低,分别为 p = .041 和 p = .007。普遍报告的获得医疗服务的障碍是经济和时间限制:结论:具有 SDOH 风险因素的患者需要在门诊环境中得到支持,以保持在 IRF 住院期间获得的功能收益。女性性别、收入和城市环境是预测COVID-19感染康复后长期生活质量和独立性缺陷的潜在因素。情绪低落是患者在康复住院一年后寻求护理的一个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social determinants of health and COVID-19 recovery after inpatient rehabilitation.

Background: Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection can have long-term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long-term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment.

Objective: To determine SDOH factors related to long-term independence and QoL of COVID-19 patients after IRF stay.

Design: Multisite cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Two urban IRFs.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results: Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post-IRF stay for severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF-36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥$70,000, p = .004), and living in the city (p = .046). Similarly, patients who were of the male gender (p = .004) and had higher income (≥$70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow-up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow-up care reported lower SF-36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints.

Conclusions: Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long-term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID-19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信