窥阴器自行插入:妇科检查的替代方法?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Marie-Morgane Veto, Julie Chazalon, Corinne Atallah-Seive, Rodolphe Charles, Angélique Savall
{"title":"窥阴器自行插入:妇科检查的替代方法?","authors":"Marie-Morgane Veto, Julie Chazalon, Corinne Atallah-Seive, Rodolphe Charles, Angélique Savall","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Speculum examination is an intrusive practice in the clinical care of women. It requires privacy and patients may experience discomfort or anxiety related to the procedure, which can result in delays or avoidance of necessary healthcare. Speculum self-insertion originated in the United States in the 1970s as part of the self-help movement. However, this clinical practice is largely unknown among healthcare providers and has rarely been assessed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigates the women's views and healthcare providers' experiences of the self-insertion method.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted between December 2021 and October 2022, including fieldwork combining semi-structured interviews (10 women) and focus groups associated with individual interviews of 13 healthcare providers. The data collected were independently coded by 2 authors and analysed using an inductive approach and grounded theory method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Speculum self-insertion was described as a way to decrease discomfort and facilitate speculum insertion. Self-insertion was proposed as a means of allowing women to participate in the examination, reducing their vulnerability against power imbalances in the doctor-patient relationship. Both patients and healthcare providers have reported that speculum self-insertion is a method that can contribute to improving trust and communication during the examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The practice of speculum self-insertion during the consultation is an alternative to traditional practitioner insertion and may be offered to all women by any practitioner who wishes to use this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speculum self-insertion: an alternative method for gynaecological examination?\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Morgane Veto, Julie Chazalon, Corinne Atallah-Seive, Rodolphe Charles, Angélique Savall\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmae016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Speculum examination is an intrusive practice in the clinical care of women. It requires privacy and patients may experience discomfort or anxiety related to the procedure, which can result in delays or avoidance of necessary healthcare. Speculum self-insertion originated in the United States in the 1970s as part of the self-help movement. However, this clinical practice is largely unknown among healthcare providers and has rarely been assessed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigates the women's views and healthcare providers' experiences of the self-insertion method.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted between December 2021 and October 2022, including fieldwork combining semi-structured interviews (10 women) and focus groups associated with individual interviews of 13 healthcare providers. The data collected were independently coded by 2 authors and analysed using an inductive approach and grounded theory method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Speculum self-insertion was described as a way to decrease discomfort and facilitate speculum insertion. Self-insertion was proposed as a means of allowing women to participate in the examination, reducing their vulnerability against power imbalances in the doctor-patient relationship. Both patients and healthcare providers have reported that speculum self-insertion is a method that can contribute to improving trust and communication during the examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The practice of speculum self-insertion during the consultation is an alternative to traditional practitioner insertion and may be offered to all women by any practitioner who wishes to use this technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:窥阴器检查是妇女临床护理中的一项侵入性操作。它需要保护隐私,患者可能会因检查过程而感到不适或焦虑,从而导致延误或避免接受必要的医疗服务。作为自助运动的一部分,自行插入窥阴器起源于 20 世纪 70 年代的美国。目的:本研究调查了妇女对自行插入窥阴器方法的看法和医疗服务提供者的经验:在 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 10 月期间开展了一项定性研究,包括结合半结构式访谈(10 名女性)和焦点小组的实地调查,以及对 13 名医疗服务提供者的个别访谈。收集到的数据由两位作者独立编码,并采用归纳法和基础理论法进行分析:窥阴器自行插入被描述为减少不适感和方便窥阴器插入的一种方法。自行插入窥阴器被认为是允许妇女参与检查的一种手段,可减少她们在医患关系中面对权力失衡的脆弱性。患者和医护人员都表示,窥阴器自行插入是一种有助于在检查过程中增进信任和沟通的方法:结论:在咨询过程中自行插入窥阴器的做法是传统医师插入窥阴器的替代方法,任何希望使用这种技术的医师都可以向所有妇女提供这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speculum self-insertion: an alternative method for gynaecological examination?

Background: Speculum examination is an intrusive practice in the clinical care of women. It requires privacy and patients may experience discomfort or anxiety related to the procedure, which can result in delays or avoidance of necessary healthcare. Speculum self-insertion originated in the United States in the 1970s as part of the self-help movement. However, this clinical practice is largely unknown among healthcare providers and has rarely been assessed.

Aim: This study investigates the women's views and healthcare providers' experiences of the self-insertion method.

Method: A qualitative study was conducted between December 2021 and October 2022, including fieldwork combining semi-structured interviews (10 women) and focus groups associated with individual interviews of 13 healthcare providers. The data collected were independently coded by 2 authors and analysed using an inductive approach and grounded theory method.

Results: Speculum self-insertion was described as a way to decrease discomfort and facilitate speculum insertion. Self-insertion was proposed as a means of allowing women to participate in the examination, reducing their vulnerability against power imbalances in the doctor-patient relationship. Both patients and healthcare providers have reported that speculum self-insertion is a method that can contribute to improving trust and communication during the examination.

Conclusion: The practice of speculum self-insertion during the consultation is an alternative to traditional practitioner insertion and may be offered to all women by any practitioner who wishes to use this technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信