中风后护理路径和痉挛治疗:艾伯塔省的一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1017/cjn.2024.42
Lalith Satkunam, Sean P Dukelow, Jaime Yu, Stephen McNeil, Huong Luu, Karen J B Martins, Khanh Vu, Phuong Uyen Nguyen, Lawrence Richer, Tyler Williamson, Scott W Klarenbach
{"title":"中风后护理路径和痉挛治疗:艾伯塔省的一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Lalith Satkunam, Sean P Dukelow, Jaime Yu, Stephen McNeil, Huong Luu, Karen J B Martins, Khanh Vu, Phuong Uyen Nguyen, Lawrence Richer, Tyler Williamson, Scott W Klarenbach","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited evidence exists regarding care pathways for stroke survivors who do and do not receive poststroke spasticity (PSS) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Administrative data was used to identify adults who experienced a stroke and sought acute care between 2012 and 2017 in Alberta, Canada. Pathways of stroke care within the health care system were determined among those who initiated PSS treatment (PSS treatment group: outpatient pharmacy dispensation of an anti-spastic medication, focal chemo-denervation injection, or a spasticity tertiary clinic visit) and those who did not (non-PSS treatment group). Time from the stroke event until spasticity treatment initiation, and setting where treatment was initiated were reported. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health care settings within the pathways of stroke care that the PSS (<i>n</i> = 1,079) and non-PSS (<i>n</i> = 22,922) treatment groups encountered were the emergency department (86 and 84%), acute inpatient care (80 and 69%), inpatient rehabilitation (40 and 12%), and long-term care (19 and 13%), respectively. PSS treatment was initiated a median of 291 (interquartile range 625) days after the stroke event, and most often in the community when patients were residing at home (45%), followed by \"other\" settings (22%), inpatient rehabilitation (18%), long-term care (11%), and acute inpatient care (4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first population based cohort study describing pathways of care among adults with stroke who subsequently did or did not initiate spasticity treatment. Areas for improvement in care may include strategies for earlier identification and treatment of PSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"75-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poststroke Care Pathways and Spasticity Treatment: A Retrospective Study in Alberta.\",\"authors\":\"Lalith Satkunam, Sean P Dukelow, Jaime Yu, Stephen McNeil, Huong Luu, Karen J B Martins, Khanh Vu, Phuong Uyen Nguyen, Lawrence Richer, Tyler Williamson, Scott W Klarenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited evidence exists regarding care pathways for stroke survivors who do and do not receive poststroke spasticity (PSS) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Administrative data was used to identify adults who experienced a stroke and sought acute care between 2012 and 2017 in Alberta, Canada. Pathways of stroke care within the health care system were determined among those who initiated PSS treatment (PSS treatment group: outpatient pharmacy dispensation of an anti-spastic medication, focal chemo-denervation injection, or a spasticity tertiary clinic visit) and those who did not (non-PSS treatment group). Time from the stroke event until spasticity treatment initiation, and setting where treatment was initiated were reported. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health care settings within the pathways of stroke care that the PSS (<i>n</i> = 1,079) and non-PSS (<i>n</i> = 22,922) treatment groups encountered were the emergency department (86 and 84%), acute inpatient care (80 and 69%), inpatient rehabilitation (40 and 12%), and long-term care (19 and 13%), respectively. PSS treatment was initiated a median of 291 (interquartile range 625) days after the stroke event, and most often in the community when patients were residing at home (45%), followed by \\\"other\\\" settings (22%), inpatient rehabilitation (18%), long-term care (11%), and acute inpatient care (4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first population based cohort study describing pathways of care among adults with stroke who subsequently did or did not initiate spasticity treatment. Areas for improvement in care may include strategies for earlier identification and treatment of PSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"75-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.42\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.42","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关中风幸存者接受或不接受中风后痉挛(PSS)治疗的护理路径的证据有限:方法:使用管理数据来识别 2012 年至 2017 年间在加拿大艾伯塔省经历过中风并寻求急诊治疗的成年人。研究人员确定了在医疗保健系统中接受卒中后痉挛治疗的患者(卒中后痉挛治疗组:门诊药房配发抗痉挛药物、病灶化学去势注射或痉挛三级门诊就诊)和未接受卒中后痉挛治疗的患者(非卒中后痉挛治疗组)的卒中治疗路径。报告了从中风事件到开始痉挛治疗的时间以及开始治疗的地点。结果结果:PSS(n = 1,079)治疗组和非 PSS(n = 22,922)治疗组在中风治疗路径中遇到的医疗机构分别是急诊科(86% 和 84%)、急性期住院医疗机构(80% 和 69%)、住院康复医疗机构(40% 和 12%)以及长期医疗机构(19% 和 13%)。中风事件发生后中位数为 291 天(四分位数间距为 625 天),PSS 治疗最常在患者在家居住的社区开始(45%),其次是 "其他 "环境(22%)、住院康复(18%)、长期护理(11%)和急性住院护理(4%):据我们所知,这是第一项基于人群的队列研究,描述了中风成人患者接受或不接受痉挛治疗的护理路径。需要改进的护理领域可能包括早期识别和治疗痉挛性斜颈的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poststroke Care Pathways and Spasticity Treatment: A Retrospective Study in Alberta.

Background: Limited evidence exists regarding care pathways for stroke survivors who do and do not receive poststroke spasticity (PSS) treatment.

Methods: Administrative data was used to identify adults who experienced a stroke and sought acute care between 2012 and 2017 in Alberta, Canada. Pathways of stroke care within the health care system were determined among those who initiated PSS treatment (PSS treatment group: outpatient pharmacy dispensation of an anti-spastic medication, focal chemo-denervation injection, or a spasticity tertiary clinic visit) and those who did not (non-PSS treatment group). Time from the stroke event until spasticity treatment initiation, and setting where treatment was initiated were reported. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: Health care settings within the pathways of stroke care that the PSS (n = 1,079) and non-PSS (n = 22,922) treatment groups encountered were the emergency department (86 and 84%), acute inpatient care (80 and 69%), inpatient rehabilitation (40 and 12%), and long-term care (19 and 13%), respectively. PSS treatment was initiated a median of 291 (interquartile range 625) days after the stroke event, and most often in the community when patients were residing at home (45%), followed by "other" settings (22%), inpatient rehabilitation (18%), long-term care (11%), and acute inpatient care (4%).

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first population based cohort study describing pathways of care among adults with stroke who subsequently did or did not initiate spasticity treatment. Areas for improvement in care may include strategies for earlier identification and treatment of PSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信