儿童比成人更快地提取新的语言规则。

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Sarah Berger, Laura J. Batterink
{"title":"儿童比成人更快地提取新的语言规则。","authors":"Sarah Berger,&nbsp;Laura J. Batterink","doi":"10.1111/desc.13498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Children achieve better long-term language outcomes than adults. However, it remains unclear whether children actually learn language <i>more quickly</i> than adults during real-time exposure to input—indicative of true superior language learning abilities—or whether this advantage stems from other factors. To examine this issue, we compared the rate at which children (8–10 years) and adults extracted a novel, hidden linguistic rule, in which novel articles probabilistically predicted the animacy of associated nouns (e.g., “gi lion”). Participants categorized these two-word phrases according to a second, explicitly instructed rule over two sessions, separated by an overnight delay. Both children and adults successfully learned the hidden animacy rule through mere exposure to the phrases, showing slower response times and decreased accuracy to occasional phrases that violated the rule. Critically, sensitivity to the hidden rule emerged much more quickly in children than adults; children showed a processing cost for violation trials from very early on in learning, whereas adults did not show reliable sensitivity to the rule until the second session. Children also showed superior generalization of the hidden animacy rule when asked to classify nonword trials (e.g., “gi badupi”) according to the hidden animacy rule. Children and adults showed similar retention of the hidden rule over the delay period. These results provide insight into the nature of the critical period for language, suggesting that children have a true advantage over adults in the rate of implicit language learning. Relative to adults, children more rapidly extract hidden linguistic structures during real-time language exposure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Children and adults both succeeded in implicitly learning a novel, uninstructed linguistic rule, based solely on exposure to input.</li>\n \n <li>Children learned the novel linguistic rules much more quickly than adults.</li>\n \n <li>Children showed better generalization performance than adults when asked to apply the novel rule to nonsense words without semantic content.</li>\n \n <li>Results provide insight into the nature of critical period effects in language, indicating that children have an advantage over adults in real-time language learning.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13498","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Berger,&nbsp;Laura J. Batterink\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/desc.13498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Children achieve better long-term language outcomes than adults. However, it remains unclear whether children actually learn language <i>more quickly</i> than adults during real-time exposure to input—indicative of true superior language learning abilities—or whether this advantage stems from other factors. To examine this issue, we compared the rate at which children (8–10 years) and adults extracted a novel, hidden linguistic rule, in which novel articles probabilistically predicted the animacy of associated nouns (e.g., “gi lion”). Participants categorized these two-word phrases according to a second, explicitly instructed rule over two sessions, separated by an overnight delay. Both children and adults successfully learned the hidden animacy rule through mere exposure to the phrases, showing slower response times and decreased accuracy to occasional phrases that violated the rule. Critically, sensitivity to the hidden rule emerged much more quickly in children than adults; children showed a processing cost for violation trials from very early on in learning, whereas adults did not show reliable sensitivity to the rule until the second session. Children also showed superior generalization of the hidden animacy rule when asked to classify nonword trials (e.g., “gi badupi”) according to the hidden animacy rule. Children and adults showed similar retention of the hidden rule over the delay period. These results provide insight into the nature of the critical period for language, suggesting that children have a true advantage over adults in the rate of implicit language learning. Relative to adults, children more rapidly extract hidden linguistic structures during real-time language exposure.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Children and adults both succeeded in implicitly learning a novel, uninstructed linguistic rule, based solely on exposure to input.</li>\\n \\n <li>Children learned the novel linguistic rules much more quickly than adults.</li>\\n \\n <li>Children showed better generalization performance than adults when asked to apply the novel rule to nonsense words without semantic content.</li>\\n \\n <li>Results provide insight into the nature of critical period effects in language, indicating that children have an advantage over adults in real-time language learning.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Science\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13498\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13498\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13498","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与成人相比,儿童的长期语言学习效果更好。然而,目前仍不清楚的是,儿童在实时接触输入的过程中是否真的比成人更快地学习语言--这表明儿童具有真正的超强语言学习能力--或者这种优势是否源于其他因素。为了研究这个问题,我们比较了儿童(8-10 岁)和成人提取新颖的隐藏语言规则的速度,其中新颖的冠词可能会预测相关名词(如 "吉狮")的动物性。受试者根据第二条明确指示的规则对这些双词短语进行分类,分两次进行,每次间隔一夜。儿童和成人仅通过接触这些短语就成功地学会了隐藏的动画规则,但对偶尔违反规则的短语反应时间较慢,准确率也有所下降。重要的是,儿童对隐藏规则的敏感性比成人出现得更快;儿童在学习初期就表现出了对违规试验的处理成本,而成人直到第二次训练才表现出对规则的可靠敏感性。当被要求根据隐藏的动物性规则对非词试验(如 "gi badupi")进行分类时,儿童对隐藏的动物性规则也表现出更高的泛化能力。在延迟期内,儿童和成人对隐藏规则的保留程度相似。这些结果让我们对语言关键期的性质有了深入的了解,表明儿童在隐性语言学习的速度上确实比成人有优势。与成人相比,儿童在实时语言接触过程中更快地提取出隐藏的语言结构。研究亮点儿童和成人都能成功地隐性学习一种新的、未经指导的语言规则,这完全是基于对输入的接触。儿童学习新语言规则的速度比成人快得多。当要求儿童将新规则应用于没有语义内容的无意义词语时,他们比成人表现出更好的泛化能力。研究结果让我们了解到语言关键期效应的本质,表明儿童在实时语言学习方面比成人更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults

Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults

Children achieve better long-term language outcomes than adults. However, it remains unclear whether children actually learn language more quickly than adults during real-time exposure to input—indicative of true superior language learning abilities—or whether this advantage stems from other factors. To examine this issue, we compared the rate at which children (8–10 years) and adults extracted a novel, hidden linguistic rule, in which novel articles probabilistically predicted the animacy of associated nouns (e.g., “gi lion”). Participants categorized these two-word phrases according to a second, explicitly instructed rule over two sessions, separated by an overnight delay. Both children and adults successfully learned the hidden animacy rule through mere exposure to the phrases, showing slower response times and decreased accuracy to occasional phrases that violated the rule. Critically, sensitivity to the hidden rule emerged much more quickly in children than adults; children showed a processing cost for violation trials from very early on in learning, whereas adults did not show reliable sensitivity to the rule until the second session. Children also showed superior generalization of the hidden animacy rule when asked to classify nonword trials (e.g., “gi badupi”) according to the hidden animacy rule. Children and adults showed similar retention of the hidden rule over the delay period. These results provide insight into the nature of the critical period for language, suggesting that children have a true advantage over adults in the rate of implicit language learning. Relative to adults, children more rapidly extract hidden linguistic structures during real-time language exposure.

Research Highlights

  • Children and adults both succeeded in implicitly learning a novel, uninstructed linguistic rule, based solely on exposure to input.
  • Children learned the novel linguistic rules much more quickly than adults.
  • Children showed better generalization performance than adults when asked to apply the novel rule to nonsense words without semantic content.
  • Results provide insight into the nature of critical period effects in language, indicating that children have an advantage over adults in real-time language learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信