腰椎滑脱症和脊椎滑脱症患者的腰椎节段稳定训练对控制残疾和疼痛强度的效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004989
Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar
{"title":"腰椎滑脱症和脊椎滑脱症患者的腰椎节段稳定训练对控制残疾和疼痛强度的效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000004989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness of lumbar segmental stabilization exercise (LSSE) in managing spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are spinal disorders associated with lumbar segmental instability. LSSE has shown positive effects in treating these conditions; however, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are lacking.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, including studies from the inception of the databases used up to January 2024, was conducted. Disability improvement and pain intensity change were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, standardized using Hedges g . Eligible articles underwent independent scrutiny by two authors, who also performed data extraction and quality assessment. Data pooling was accomplished using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, five randomized controlled trials comprising 198 participants were included, revealing a trend effect toward disability improvement in the LSSE group (Hedges g =-0.598, 95% CI: -1.211 to 0.016, P =0.056, I2 =75.447%). When the LSSE was administered as a single treatment, disability improvement became significant (Hedge g =-1.325, 95% CI: -2.598 to -0.053, P =0.041, I2 =80.020%). No significant effect of LSSE on pain reduction was observed (Hedges g =-0.496, 95% CI: -1.082 to 0.090, P =0.097, I2 =73.935%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, our meta-analysis suggests that LSSE can potentially improve disability, especially when used as a single treatment. LSSE appears more beneficial in reducing disability than alleviating pain. Future research on different patient groups is needed to understand comprehensively LSSE's effects on other musculoskeletal disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1512-1520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Lumbar Segmental Stabilization Exercises in Managing Disability and Pain Intensity Among Patients With Lumbar Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Long-Huei Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000004989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness of lumbar segmental stabilization exercise (LSSE) in managing spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are spinal disorders associated with lumbar segmental instability. LSSE has shown positive effects in treating these conditions; however, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are lacking.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, including studies from the inception of the databases used up to January 2024, was conducted. Disability improvement and pain intensity change were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, standardized using Hedges g . Eligible articles underwent independent scrutiny by two authors, who also performed data extraction and quality assessment. Data pooling was accomplished using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, five randomized controlled trials comprising 198 participants were included, revealing a trend effect toward disability improvement in the LSSE group (Hedges g =-0.598, 95% CI: -1.211 to 0.016, P =0.056, I2 =75.447%). When the LSSE was administered as a single treatment, disability improvement became significant (Hedge g =-1.325, 95% CI: -2.598 to -0.053, P =0.041, I2 =80.020%). No significant effect of LSSE on pain reduction was observed (Hedges g =-0.496, 95% CI: -1.082 to 0.090, P =0.097, I2 =73.935%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, our meta-analysis suggests that LSSE can potentially improve disability, especially when used as a single treatment. LSSE appears more beneficial in reducing disability than alleviating pain. Future research on different patient groups is needed to understand comprehensively LSSE's effects on other musculoskeletal disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1512-1520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004989\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计系统综述和荟萃分析:本研究旨在评估腰椎节段稳定训练(LSSE)在治疗脊柱溶解症和脊柱滑脱症方面的有效性:脊柱溶解症和脊柱滑脱症是与腰椎节段不稳定有关的脊柱疾病。LSSE 在治疗这些疾病方面显示出积极的效果;然而,目前还缺乏系统性回顾和荟萃分析:方法:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南进行了系统性检索,包括从所用数据库建立之初到 2024 年 1 月的研究。残疾改善和疼痛强度变化分别为主要和次要研究结果,使用赫奇斯g进行标准化。符合条件的文章由两位作者进行独立审查,他们还负责数据提取和质量评估。数据汇总采用随机效应模型:共纳入了五项随机对照试验,共有 198 名参与者,结果显示 LSSE 组的残疾改善效果呈趋势(Hedges' g=-0.598, 95% CI=-1.211 to 0.016, P=0.056, I2=75.447%)。当 LSSE 作为一种单一治疗方法时,残疾改善效果变得显著(Hedges' g=-1.325, 95% CI=-2.598 to -0.053, P=0.041, I2=80.020%)。LSSE对减轻疼痛无明显效果(Hedges' g=-0.496,95% CI=-1.082至0.090,P=0.097,I2=73.935%):总之,我们的荟萃分析表明,LSSE 有可能改善残疾状况,尤其是作为单一疗法使用时。与减轻疼痛相比,LSSE 似乎更有利于减少残疾。未来需要对不同患者群体进行研究,以全面了解 LSSE 对其他肌肉骨骼疾病的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Lumbar Segmental Stabilization Exercises in Managing Disability and Pain Intensity Among Patients With Lumbar Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of lumbar segmental stabilization exercise (LSSE) in managing spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Summary of background data: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are spinal disorders associated with lumbar segmental instability. LSSE has shown positive effects in treating these conditions; however, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are lacking.

Materials and methods: A systematic search adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, including studies from the inception of the databases used up to January 2024, was conducted. Disability improvement and pain intensity change were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, standardized using Hedges g . Eligible articles underwent independent scrutiny by two authors, who also performed data extraction and quality assessment. Data pooling was accomplished using a random-effects model.

Results: In total, five randomized controlled trials comprising 198 participants were included, revealing a trend effect toward disability improvement in the LSSE group (Hedges g =-0.598, 95% CI: -1.211 to 0.016, P =0.056, I2 =75.447%). When the LSSE was administered as a single treatment, disability improvement became significant (Hedge g =-1.325, 95% CI: -2.598 to -0.053, P =0.041, I2 =80.020%). No significant effect of LSSE on pain reduction was observed (Hedges g =-0.496, 95% CI: -1.082 to 0.090, P =0.097, I2 =73.935%).

Conclusions: In summary, our meta-analysis suggests that LSSE can potentially improve disability, especially when used as a single treatment. LSSE appears more beneficial in reducing disability than alleviating pain. Future research on different patient groups is needed to understand comprehensively LSSE's effects on other musculoskeletal disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信