空静脉消融(EVA)技术:评估硬化剂浓度和壁接触时间对内膜和中膜结构影响的体内动物模型。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Angiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05147-2
Mario Salerno, Daniele Bissacco, Yung-Wei Chi, Sryram Narayanan, Alessandro Addis, Claudia Dellavia, Elena Canciani, Paolo C Righini, Giovanni Nano, Sergio Gianesini
{"title":"空静脉消融(EVA)技术:评估硬化剂浓度和壁接触时间对内膜和中膜结构影响的体内动物模型。","authors":"Mario Salerno, Daniele Bissacco, Yung-Wei Chi, Sryram Narayanan, Alessandro Addis, Claudia Dellavia, Elena Canciani, Paolo C Righini, Giovanni Nano, Sergio Gianesini","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05147-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sclerotherapy is a cornerstone of the treatment of chronic venous disease, despite some technical aspects (e.g., sclerosant liquid agent concentration [SLAC] and contact time between sclerosant agent and vein wall [ctSA/VW]) to maximize outcomes remain an unsolved problem and a source of debate. An innovative three-balloon catheter has been developed to allow sclerotherapy in empty vein conditions (Empty Vein Ablation technique, EVA), revolutionizing the definition of SLAC and ctSA/VW. Aim of this experimental study is to analyze EVA effects on intima and media vessel tunicae using different SLAC and ctSA/VW in an in-vivo animal model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two adult sheep were treated by EVA using jugular and common iliac vein axes (eight vein segments). Different SLAC (polidocanol 0.5% or 1%) and different ctSA/VW (3 or 5 minutes) were combined for testing residual circumferential intima percentage and media thickness after EVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intact circumferential residual intima after the treatment was 21.3±4.9%, 18.2±7.4%, 15.7±2.4% and 8.9±2.0% using 0.5% (3 min), 0.5% (5 min), 1% (3 min) and 1% (5 min), respectively (R<sup>2</sup>=0.945; control sample: 97.6%). Media thickness after the treatment was 121.6±35.3 µm, 110.9±7.8 µm, 96.1±30.4 µm and 79.1±34.1 µm using 0.5% (3 min), 0.5% (5 min), 1% (3 min) and 1% (5 min), respectively (R<sup>2</sup>=0.990; control sample 125.7 µm). No significant modifications were detected analyzing the adventitia in all samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVA proved to be effective in venous wall destruction even with a very low SLAC and ctSA/VW (0.5% in 3 minutes), in quite large caliber veins. Direct comparisons with foam/liquid sclerotherapy should be done to confirm therapeutic effectiveness of these results, despite EVA has provided a maximized and controlled SA/VW contact time and ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"223-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empty vein ablation (EVA) technique: an in-vivo animal model to assess the effects of sclerosing agent concentration and wall contact time on intima and media tunicae structure.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Salerno, Daniele Bissacco, Yung-Wei Chi, Sryram Narayanan, Alessandro Addis, Claudia Dellavia, Elena Canciani, Paolo C Righini, Giovanni Nano, Sergio Gianesini\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05147-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sclerotherapy is a cornerstone of the treatment of chronic venous disease, despite some technical aspects (e.g., sclerosant liquid agent concentration [SLAC] and contact time between sclerosant agent and vein wall [ctSA/VW]) to maximize outcomes remain an unsolved problem and a source of debate. An innovative three-balloon catheter has been developed to allow sclerotherapy in empty vein conditions (Empty Vein Ablation technique, EVA), revolutionizing the definition of SLAC and ctSA/VW. Aim of this experimental study is to analyze EVA effects on intima and media vessel tunicae using different SLAC and ctSA/VW in an in-vivo animal model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two adult sheep were treated by EVA using jugular and common iliac vein axes (eight vein segments). Different SLAC (polidocanol 0.5% or 1%) and different ctSA/VW (3 or 5 minutes) were combined for testing residual circumferential intima percentage and media thickness after EVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intact circumferential residual intima after the treatment was 21.3±4.9%, 18.2±7.4%, 15.7±2.4% and 8.9±2.0% using 0.5% (3 min), 0.5% (5 min), 1% (3 min) and 1% (5 min), respectively (R<sup>2</sup>=0.945; control sample: 97.6%). Media thickness after the treatment was 121.6±35.3 µm, 110.9±7.8 µm, 96.1±30.4 µm and 79.1±34.1 µm using 0.5% (3 min), 0.5% (5 min), 1% (3 min) and 1% (5 min), respectively (R<sup>2</sup>=0.990; control sample 125.7 µm). No significant modifications were detected analyzing the adventitia in all samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVA proved to be effective in venous wall destruction even with a very low SLAC and ctSA/VW (0.5% in 3 minutes), in quite large caliber veins. Direct comparisons with foam/liquid sclerotherapy should be done to confirm therapeutic effectiveness of these results, despite EVA has provided a maximized and controlled SA/VW contact time and ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"223-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05147-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05147-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:硬化剂疗法是治疗慢性静脉疾病的基石,尽管在某些技术方面(如硬化剂液体制剂浓度[SLAC]和硬化剂制剂与静脉壁的接触时间[ctSA/VW]),如何最大限度地提高疗效仍是一个悬而未决的问题,也是争论的焦点。目前已开发出一种创新的三球囊导管,可在空静脉条件下进行硬化剂治疗(空静脉消融技术,EVA),彻底改变了 SLAC 和 ctSA/VW 的定义。本实验研究的目的是在体内动物模型中使用不同的 SLAC 和 ctSA/VW 分析 EVA 对血管内膜和中膜的影响:方法:使用颈静脉和髂总静脉轴(八个静脉段)对两只成年绵羊进行 EVA 治疗。结合不同的 SLAC(polidocanol 0.5%或 1%)和不同的 ctSA/VW(3 或 5 分钟)测试 EVA 后残留的周缘内膜百分比和介质厚度:0.5%(3分钟)、0.5%(5分钟)、1%(3分钟)和1%(5分钟)处理后的完整周缘残留内膜分别为21.3±4.9%、18.2±7.4%、15.7±2.4%和8.9±2.0%(R2=0.945;对照样本:97.6%)。使用 0.5% (3 分钟)、0.5% (5 分钟)、1% (3 分钟) 和 1% (5 分钟) 处理后的培养基厚度分别为 121.6±35.3 µm、110.9±7.8 µm、96.1±30.4 µm 和 79.1±34.1 µm(R2=0.990;对照样品 125.7 µm)。在分析所有样本的血管内膜时均未发现明显变化:结论:事实证明,即使 SLAC 和 ctSA/VW 很低(3 分钟内为 0.5%),EVA 也能有效破坏大口径静脉的静脉壁。尽管 EVA 提供了最大化和可控的 SA/VW 接触时间和比率,但仍需与泡沫/液体硬化剂疗法进行直接比较,以确认这些结果的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empty vein ablation (EVA) technique: an in-vivo animal model to assess the effects of sclerosing agent concentration and wall contact time on intima and media tunicae structure.

Background: Sclerotherapy is a cornerstone of the treatment of chronic venous disease, despite some technical aspects (e.g., sclerosant liquid agent concentration [SLAC] and contact time between sclerosant agent and vein wall [ctSA/VW]) to maximize outcomes remain an unsolved problem and a source of debate. An innovative three-balloon catheter has been developed to allow sclerotherapy in empty vein conditions (Empty Vein Ablation technique, EVA), revolutionizing the definition of SLAC and ctSA/VW. Aim of this experimental study is to analyze EVA effects on intima and media vessel tunicae using different SLAC and ctSA/VW in an in-vivo animal model.

Methods: Two adult sheep were treated by EVA using jugular and common iliac vein axes (eight vein segments). Different SLAC (polidocanol 0.5% or 1%) and different ctSA/VW (3 or 5 minutes) were combined for testing residual circumferential intima percentage and media thickness after EVA.

Results: Intact circumferential residual intima after the treatment was 21.3±4.9%, 18.2±7.4%, 15.7±2.4% and 8.9±2.0% using 0.5% (3 min), 0.5% (5 min), 1% (3 min) and 1% (5 min), respectively (R2=0.945; control sample: 97.6%). Media thickness after the treatment was 121.6±35.3 µm, 110.9±7.8 µm, 96.1±30.4 µm and 79.1±34.1 µm using 0.5% (3 min), 0.5% (5 min), 1% (3 min) and 1% (5 min), respectively (R2=0.990; control sample 125.7 µm). No significant modifications were detected analyzing the adventitia in all samples.

Conclusions: EVA proved to be effective in venous wall destruction even with a very low SLAC and ctSA/VW (0.5% in 3 minutes), in quite large caliber veins. Direct comparisons with foam/liquid sclerotherapy should be done to confirm therapeutic effectiveness of these results, despite EVA has provided a maximized and controlled SA/VW contact time and ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信