色盲与语义知识:色盲和正常观察者从诱导列表中认知颜色术语

IF 1.2 3区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Humberto Moreira, Leticia Álvaro, Julio Lillo
{"title":"色盲与语义知识:色盲和正常观察者从诱导列表中认知颜色术语","authors":"Humberto Moreira,&nbsp;Leticia Álvaro,&nbsp;Julio Lillo","doi":"10.1002/col.22925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Color blindness (color vision deficiency) affects ~8% of males and ~ 0.4% females worldwide. Here we use the elicited lists method to investigate their semantic knowledge regarding “basic color terms” and their relationships. Lists were obtained from color vision deficient and normal observers. 32 dichromats (15 protanopes, 17 deuteranopes) and 32 normal trichromats (17 females, 15 males) diagnosed by a battery of color tests (Ishihara, City University Test, anomaloscope) wrote monolexemic lists of colors. Psychological salience of terms (ln(CSI)), adjacency between pairs of terms (ADJ; MDS) and the presence of clusters of terms defined on the basis of the Universals and evolution hypothesis were analyzed. All four groups of participants showed the same semantic memory structure: lists started with the cardinal primaries cluster (blue, red, yellow, green), followed by the achromatic primaries cluster (black and white), or the derived cluster (brown, orange, violet, pink, purple, and gray). After the clusters (cardinals, achromatics, and derived), a highly variable number of non-basic terms appeared. This number was higher in normal trichromats. Non-basic terms were not part of any cognitive cluster. The similarity in the lists of trichromats and dichromats suggest that both may acquire similar semantic knowledge about color terms. Several potential explanations are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":10459,"journal":{"name":"Color Research and Application","volume":"49 5","pages":"420-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/col.22925","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Color blindness and semantic knowledge: Cognition of color terms from elicited lists in dichromats and normal observers\",\"authors\":\"Humberto Moreira,&nbsp;Leticia Álvaro,&nbsp;Julio Lillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/col.22925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Color blindness (color vision deficiency) affects ~8% of males and ~ 0.4% females worldwide. Here we use the elicited lists method to investigate their semantic knowledge regarding “basic color terms” and their relationships. Lists were obtained from color vision deficient and normal observers. 32 dichromats (15 protanopes, 17 deuteranopes) and 32 normal trichromats (17 females, 15 males) diagnosed by a battery of color tests (Ishihara, City University Test, anomaloscope) wrote monolexemic lists of colors. Psychological salience of terms (ln(CSI)), adjacency between pairs of terms (ADJ; MDS) and the presence of clusters of terms defined on the basis of the Universals and evolution hypothesis were analyzed. All four groups of participants showed the same semantic memory structure: lists started with the cardinal primaries cluster (blue, red, yellow, green), followed by the achromatic primaries cluster (black and white), or the derived cluster (brown, orange, violet, pink, purple, and gray). After the clusters (cardinals, achromatics, and derived), a highly variable number of non-basic terms appeared. This number was higher in normal trichromats. Non-basic terms were not part of any cognitive cluster. The similarity in the lists of trichromats and dichromats suggest that both may acquire similar semantic knowledge about color terms. Several potential explanations are considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Color Research and Application\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"420-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/col.22925\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Color Research and Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/col.22925\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Color Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/col.22925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球约有 8% 的男性和约 0.4% 的女性患有色盲(色觉缺陷)。在这里,我们使用诱发列表法来研究他们对 "基本颜色术语 "及其关系的语义知识。我们从色觉障碍者和正常观察者那里获得了清单。通过一系列颜色测试(石原测试、城市大学测试、异常镜)确诊的 32 名色弱者(15 名原色弱者,17 名去色弱者)和 32 名正常色弱者(17 名女性,15 名男性)写出了单复色表。我们对术语的心理显著性(ln(CSI))、术语对之间的邻接性(ADJ;MDS)以及根据普遍性和进化假说定义的术语群的存在进行了分析。所有四组受试者都表现出相同的语义记忆结构:列表以红基色基团(蓝、红、黄、绿)开始,然后是消色基团(黑、白)或派生基团(棕、橙、紫、粉、紫、灰)。在这些词组(红心、消色差和派生词组)之后,出现了数量变化很大的非基本词汇。正常三色者的非基本词汇数量较多。非基本词汇不属于任何认知集群。三色 "和 "二色 "的词汇表具有相似性,这表明二者可能获得了类似的颜色词汇语义知识。我们考虑了几种可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Color blindness and semantic knowledge: Cognition of color terms from elicited lists in dichromats and normal observers

Color blindness and semantic knowledge: Cognition of color terms from elicited lists in dichromats and normal observers

Color blindness and semantic knowledge: Cognition of color terms from elicited lists in dichromats and normal observers

Color blindness (color vision deficiency) affects ~8% of males and ~ 0.4% females worldwide. Here we use the elicited lists method to investigate their semantic knowledge regarding “basic color terms” and their relationships. Lists were obtained from color vision deficient and normal observers. 32 dichromats (15 protanopes, 17 deuteranopes) and 32 normal trichromats (17 females, 15 males) diagnosed by a battery of color tests (Ishihara, City University Test, anomaloscope) wrote monolexemic lists of colors. Psychological salience of terms (ln(CSI)), adjacency between pairs of terms (ADJ; MDS) and the presence of clusters of terms defined on the basis of the Universals and evolution hypothesis were analyzed. All four groups of participants showed the same semantic memory structure: lists started with the cardinal primaries cluster (blue, red, yellow, green), followed by the achromatic primaries cluster (black and white), or the derived cluster (brown, orange, violet, pink, purple, and gray). After the clusters (cardinals, achromatics, and derived), a highly variable number of non-basic terms appeared. This number was higher in normal trichromats. Non-basic terms were not part of any cognitive cluster. The similarity in the lists of trichromats and dichromats suggest that both may acquire similar semantic knowledge about color terms. Several potential explanations are considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Color Research and Application
Color Research and Application 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Color Research and Application provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed research reviews, original research articles, and editorials of the highest quality on the science, technology, and application of color in multiple disciplines. Due to the highly interdisciplinary influence of color, the readership of the journal is similarly widespread and includes those in business, art, design, education, as well as various industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信