偏远地区的监测解决方案:偏远地区自然解决方案的数据收集方法

Bartholomew Hill , Huili Chen , Qiuhua Liang , Lee Bosher , Jonathan Vann
{"title":"偏远地区的监测解决方案:偏远地区自然解决方案的数据收集方法","authors":"Bartholomew Hill ,&nbsp;Huili Chen ,&nbsp;Qiuhua Liang ,&nbsp;Lee Bosher ,&nbsp;Jonathan Vann","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature-based solutions have gained popularity as an approach to tackling hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs) in both urban and rural settings. Despite this popularity, challenges persist regarding the evidence base for their effectiveness and data scarcity at the feature or site scale. Flood modelling is a common approach to quantifying the effectiveness of NbS; however, the accuracy of these models heavily depends on the accuracy of the DEM, land cover, and hydraulic/hydrological data utilised. Remote and rural settings often face data scarcity due to the challenging nature of data collection, and insufficient funding for monitoring. Additionally, NbS features vary in size and scale, with many being small (&lt;1 m in width), posing challenges for accurate representation in national LiDAR datasets. Technological advancements in remote sensing technologies, such as unmanned aerial vehicles, handheld LiDAR, and GPS-GNSS, offer opportunities to gather high-resolution, high-accuracy data in these challenging locations. This article proposes a methodological framework for collecting elevation data at remote NbS sites that can tackle areas affected by both sparse and dense vegetation cover. This approach proves valuable in both pre-NbS implementation, through facilitating NbS opportunity and environmental risk identification, and post-NbS implementation, through aiding in geo-spatial feature location, improving existing DEM data for flood modelling, and monitoring temporal changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000119/pdfft?md5=6bcfb2cd08a3eec6967827667fcaf546&pid=1-s2.0-S2772411524000119-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring solutions for remote locations: A data gathering approach for remote nature-based solution sites\",\"authors\":\"Bartholomew Hill ,&nbsp;Huili Chen ,&nbsp;Qiuhua Liang ,&nbsp;Lee Bosher ,&nbsp;Jonathan Vann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nature-based solutions have gained popularity as an approach to tackling hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs) in both urban and rural settings. Despite this popularity, challenges persist regarding the evidence base for their effectiveness and data scarcity at the feature or site scale. Flood modelling is a common approach to quantifying the effectiveness of NbS; however, the accuracy of these models heavily depends on the accuracy of the DEM, land cover, and hydraulic/hydrological data utilised. Remote and rural settings often face data scarcity due to the challenging nature of data collection, and insufficient funding for monitoring. Additionally, NbS features vary in size and scale, with many being small (&lt;1 m in width), posing challenges for accurate representation in national LiDAR datasets. Technological advancements in remote sensing technologies, such as unmanned aerial vehicles, handheld LiDAR, and GPS-GNSS, offer opportunities to gather high-resolution, high-accuracy data in these challenging locations. This article proposes a methodological framework for collecting elevation data at remote NbS sites that can tackle areas affected by both sparse and dense vegetation cover. This approach proves valuable in both pre-NbS implementation, through facilitating NbS opportunity and environmental risk identification, and post-NbS implementation, through aiding in geo-spatial feature location, improving existing DEM data for flood modelling, and monitoring temporal changes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature-Based Solutions\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000119/pdfft?md5=6bcfb2cd08a3eec6967827667fcaf546&pid=1-s2.0-S2772411524000119-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature-Based Solutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在城市和农村地区,以自然为基础的解决方案作为应对水文气象灾害(HMHs)的一种方法,已经越来越受欢迎。尽管这种方法很受欢迎,但在其有效性的证据基础方面仍然存在挑战,而且在地物或场地范围内数据稀缺。洪水模型是量化 NbS 效果的常用方法;然而,这些模型的准确性在很大程度上取决于所使用的 DEM、土地覆被和水力/水文数据的准确性。由于数据收集具有挑战性,且监测资金不足,偏远农村地区往往面临数据稀缺的问题。此外,NbS 地物的大小和尺度各不相同,许多都很小(宽度为 1 米),这给国家激光雷达数据集的准确呈现带来了挑战。无人机、手持激光雷达和 GPS-GNSS 等遥感技术的进步为在这些具有挑战性的地点收集高分辨率、高精度数据提供了机会。本文提出了一个在偏远 NbS 站点收集高程数据的方法框架,该框架可处理受稀疏和茂密植被覆盖影响的区域。事实证明,这种方法在核安全系统实施前(通过促进核安全系统机会和环境风险识别)和核安全系统实施后(通过协助地理空间特征定位、改进用于洪水建模的现有 DEM 数据以及监测时间变化)都很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring solutions for remote locations: A data gathering approach for remote nature-based solution sites

Nature-based solutions have gained popularity as an approach to tackling hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs) in both urban and rural settings. Despite this popularity, challenges persist regarding the evidence base for their effectiveness and data scarcity at the feature or site scale. Flood modelling is a common approach to quantifying the effectiveness of NbS; however, the accuracy of these models heavily depends on the accuracy of the DEM, land cover, and hydraulic/hydrological data utilised. Remote and rural settings often face data scarcity due to the challenging nature of data collection, and insufficient funding for monitoring. Additionally, NbS features vary in size and scale, with many being small (<1 m in width), posing challenges for accurate representation in national LiDAR datasets. Technological advancements in remote sensing technologies, such as unmanned aerial vehicles, handheld LiDAR, and GPS-GNSS, offer opportunities to gather high-resolution, high-accuracy data in these challenging locations. This article proposes a methodological framework for collecting elevation data at remote NbS sites that can tackle areas affected by both sparse and dense vegetation cover. This approach proves valuable in both pre-NbS implementation, through facilitating NbS opportunity and environmental risk identification, and post-NbS implementation, through aiding in geo-spatial feature location, improving existing DEM data for flood modelling, and monitoring temporal changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信