评估 PAUL 青光眼植入物对假性外展性青光眼的疗效。

Beyoglu Eye Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/bej.2024.96729
Ali Olgun, Murat Karapapak
{"title":"评估 PAUL 青光眼植入物对假性外展性青光眼的疗效。","authors":"Ali Olgun, Murat Karapapak","doi":"10.14744/bej.2024.96729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications associated with PAUL glaucoma implant (PGI) surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) patients, comparing them with a primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 39 PXG and 29 POAG eyes undergoing PGI surgery between January 2020 and December 2022. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) between ≤21 and ≥6 mmHg at 12 months and no loss of light perception. Demographic data, ocular examinations, and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PXG patients (68.5±9.9 years) differed significantly in age from POAG patients (54.1±10.6 years) (p<0.05). Surgical success rates at 12 months were 97.4% (PXG) and 86.2% (POAG). No significant inter-group differences in gender, laterality, lens status, vertical cup/disc ratio, or pre-operative best-corrected visual acuity were observed. Mean IOP comparisons showed significant differences within both groups (p<0.001). Ripcord suture removal occurred at mean 30.3±7.43 days (PXG) and 30.6±9.89 days (POAG). Median pre-operative AGM use was 4 (PXG) and 3 (POAG). No significant differences were noted postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the results of PGI in PXG and POAG, demonstrating a remarkable success rate and limited complications. Encouragingly, PXG patients with a history of unsuccessful filtration surgery demonstrated positive outcomes. The findings affirm PGI as a promising surgical intervention for PXG and POAG, exhibiting high success rates and manageable complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8740,"journal":{"name":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Efficacy of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Olgun, Murat Karapapak\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/bej.2024.96729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications associated with PAUL glaucoma implant (PGI) surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) patients, comparing them with a primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 39 PXG and 29 POAG eyes undergoing PGI surgery between January 2020 and December 2022. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) between ≤21 and ≥6 mmHg at 12 months and no loss of light perception. Demographic data, ocular examinations, and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PXG patients (68.5±9.9 years) differed significantly in age from POAG patients (54.1±10.6 years) (p<0.05). Surgical success rates at 12 months were 97.4% (PXG) and 86.2% (POAG). No significant inter-group differences in gender, laterality, lens status, vertical cup/disc ratio, or pre-operative best-corrected visual acuity were observed. Mean IOP comparisons showed significant differences within both groups (p<0.001). Ripcord suture removal occurred at mean 30.3±7.43 days (PXG) and 30.6±9.89 days (POAG). Median pre-operative AGM use was 4 (PXG) and 3 (POAG). No significant differences were noted postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the results of PGI in PXG and POAG, demonstrating a remarkable success rate and limited complications. Encouragingly, PXG patients with a history of unsuccessful filtration surgery demonstrated positive outcomes. The findings affirm PGI as a promising surgical intervention for PXG and POAG, exhibiting high success rates and manageable complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beyoglu Eye Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"26-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944855/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beyoglu Eye Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2024.96729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2024.96729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究旨在评估假性开角型青光眼(PXG)患者接受PAUL青光眼植入体(PGI)手术后的疗效和并发症,并将其与原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)对照组进行比较:回顾性分析包括在 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受 PGI 手术的 39 只 PXG 眼和 29 只 POAG 眼。手术成功定义为 12 个月时眼压(IOP)在≤21 和≥6 mmHg 之间,且无光感丧失。记录人口统计学数据、眼部检查和并发症:结果:PXG 患者的年龄(68.5±9.9 岁)与 POAG 患者的年龄(54.1±10.6 岁)有显著差异(p 结论:就我们所知,这项研究的目的是为了确定 PXG 与 POAG 之间的差异:据我们所知,这是第一项评估 PXG 和 POAG 患者 PGI 效果的研究,显示了显著的成功率和有限的并发症。令人鼓舞的是,有过滤过手术失败史的 PXG 患者也取得了积极的疗效。这些研究结果肯定了 PGI 是治疗 PXG 和 POAG 的一种很有前景的手术干预方法,具有很高的成功率和可控的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Efficacy of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.

Assessing the Efficacy of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.

Assessing the Efficacy of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications associated with PAUL glaucoma implant (PGI) surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) patients, comparing them with a primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) control group.

Methods: A retrospective analysis included 39 PXG and 29 POAG eyes undergoing PGI surgery between January 2020 and December 2022. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) between ≤21 and ≥6 mmHg at 12 months and no loss of light perception. Demographic data, ocular examinations, and complications were recorded.

Results: PXG patients (68.5±9.9 years) differed significantly in age from POAG patients (54.1±10.6 years) (p<0.05). Surgical success rates at 12 months were 97.4% (PXG) and 86.2% (POAG). No significant inter-group differences in gender, laterality, lens status, vertical cup/disc ratio, or pre-operative best-corrected visual acuity were observed. Mean IOP comparisons showed significant differences within both groups (p<0.001). Ripcord suture removal occurred at mean 30.3±7.43 days (PXG) and 30.6±9.89 days (POAG). Median pre-operative AGM use was 4 (PXG) and 3 (POAG). No significant differences were noted postoperatively.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the results of PGI in PXG and POAG, demonstrating a remarkable success rate and limited complications. Encouragingly, PXG patients with a history of unsuccessful filtration surgery demonstrated positive outcomes. The findings affirm PGI as a promising surgical intervention for PXG and POAG, exhibiting high success rates and manageable complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信