利用 FMEA 进行放射肿瘤学勒索软件攻击响应风险分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
{"title":"利用 FMEA 进行放射肿瘤学勒索软件攻击响应风险分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>There have been numerous significant ransomware attacks impacting Radiation Oncology in the past 5 years. Research into ransomware attack response in Radiation Oncology has consisted of case reports and descriptive articles and has lacked quantitative studies. The purpose of this work was to identify the significant safety risks to patients being treated with radiation therapy during a ransomware attack scenario, using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary team conducted a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis by developing process maps and using Risk Priority Number (RPN) scores to quantify the increased likelihood of incidents in a ransomware attack scenario. The situation that was simulated was a ransomware attack that had removed the capability to access the Record and Verify (R&amp;V) system. Five situations were considered: 1) a standard treatment of a patient with and without an R&amp;V, 2) a standard treatment of a patient for the first fraction right after the R&amp;V capabilities are disabled, and 3) 3 situations in which a plan modification was required. RPN scores were compared with and without R&amp;V functionality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data indicate that RPN scores increased by 71% (range, 38%-96%) when R&amp;V functionality is disabled compared with a nonransomware attack state where R&amp;V functionality is available. The failure modes with the highest RPN in the simulated ransomware attack state included incorrectly identifying patients on treatment, incorrectly identifying where a patient is in their course of treatment, treating the incorrect patient, and incorrectly tracking delivered fractions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presented study quantifies the increased risk of incidents when treating in a ransomware attack state, identifies key failure modes that should be prioritized when preparing for a ransomware attack, and provides data that can be used to guide future ransomware resiliency research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation Oncology Ransomware Attack Response Risk Analysis Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2024.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>There have been numerous significant ransomware attacks impacting Radiation Oncology in the past 5 years. Research into ransomware attack response in Radiation Oncology has consisted of case reports and descriptive articles and has lacked quantitative studies. The purpose of this work was to identify the significant safety risks to patients being treated with radiation therapy during a ransomware attack scenario, using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary team conducted a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis by developing process maps and using Risk Priority Number (RPN) scores to quantify the increased likelihood of incidents in a ransomware attack scenario. The situation that was simulated was a ransomware attack that had removed the capability to access the Record and Verify (R&amp;V) system. Five situations were considered: 1) a standard treatment of a patient with and without an R&amp;V, 2) a standard treatment of a patient for the first fraction right after the R&amp;V capabilities are disabled, and 3) 3 situations in which a plan modification was required. RPN scores were compared with and without R&amp;V functionality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data indicate that RPN scores increased by 71% (range, 38%-96%) when R&amp;V functionality is disabled compared with a nonransomware attack state where R&amp;V functionality is available. The failure modes with the highest RPN in the simulated ransomware attack state included incorrectly identifying patients on treatment, incorrectly identifying where a patient is in their course of treatment, treating the incorrect patient, and incorrectly tracking delivered fractions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presented study quantifies the increased risk of incidents when treating in a ransomware attack state, identifies key failure modes that should be prioritized when preparing for a ransomware attack, and provides data that can be used to guide future ransomware resiliency research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850024000444\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850024000444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在过去 5 年中,发生了多起影响放射肿瘤学的重大勒索软件攻击事件。有关放射肿瘤学应对勒索软件攻击的研究主要是案例报告和描述性文章,缺乏定量研究。这项工作的目的是利用故障模式与影响分析(FMEA)确定在勒索软件攻击情况下接受放射治疗的患者所面临的重大安全风险:一个多机构、多学科团队通过绘制流程图和使用风险优先级号(RPN)评分来量化勒索软件攻击情景下发生事故的可能性,从而进行了故障模式和影响分析。模拟的情况是,勒索软件攻击使记录与验证 (R&V) 系统无法访问。共考虑了五种情况:1)在有和没有 R&V 的情况下对病人进行标准治疗;2)在 R&V 功能被禁用后对病人进行第一部分的标准治疗;3)需要修改计划的三种情况。结果显示,有和没有 R&V 功能时的 RPN 得分进行了比较:结果:数据显示,与具备 R&V 功能的非勒索软件攻击状态相比,当 R&V 功能被禁用时,RPN 分数增加了 71%(范围为 38-96%)。在模拟勒索软件攻击状态下,RPN 最高的故障模式包括:错误识别正在接受治疗的患者、错误识别患者在治疗过程中的位置、治疗不正确的患者以及错误跟踪交付的分数:本研究量化了在勒索软件攻击状态下进行治疗所增加的事故风险,确定了在准备应对勒索软件攻击时应优先考虑的关键故障模式,并提供了可用于指导未来勒索软件恢复能力研究的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiation Oncology Ransomware Attack Response Risk Analysis Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis

Purpose

There have been numerous significant ransomware attacks impacting Radiation Oncology in the past 5 years. Research into ransomware attack response in Radiation Oncology has consisted of case reports and descriptive articles and has lacked quantitative studies. The purpose of this work was to identify the significant safety risks to patients being treated with radiation therapy during a ransomware attack scenario, using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.

Methods and Materials

A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary team conducted a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis by developing process maps and using Risk Priority Number (RPN) scores to quantify the increased likelihood of incidents in a ransomware attack scenario. The situation that was simulated was a ransomware attack that had removed the capability to access the Record and Verify (R&V) system. Five situations were considered: 1) a standard treatment of a patient with and without an R&V, 2) a standard treatment of a patient for the first fraction right after the R&V capabilities are disabled, and 3) 3 situations in which a plan modification was required. RPN scores were compared with and without R&V functionality.

Results

The data indicate that RPN scores increased by 71% (range, 38%-96%) when R&V functionality is disabled compared with a nonransomware attack state where R&V functionality is available. The failure modes with the highest RPN in the simulated ransomware attack state included incorrectly identifying patients on treatment, incorrectly identifying where a patient is in their course of treatment, treating the incorrect patient, and incorrectly tracking delivered fractions.

Conclusions

The presented study quantifies the increased risk of incidents when treating in a ransomware attack state, identifies key failure modes that should be prioritized when preparing for a ransomware attack, and provides data that can be used to guide future ransomware resiliency research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信