异丙酚静脉全身麻醉和吸入麻醉对乳腺癌术后 T 淋巴细胞活性的影响:荟萃分析

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_336_23
Daqi Sun, Kunyue Li, Ziqi Chai, Lijuan Wang, Shimin Gu, Na Sun, Yu Zhang, Yuxia Wang, Tao Wang
{"title":"异丙酚静脉全身麻醉和吸入麻醉对乳腺癌术后 T 淋巴细胞活性的影响:荟萃分析","authors":"Daqi Sun, Kunyue Li, Ziqi Chai, Lijuan Wang, Shimin Gu, Na Sun, Yu Zhang, Yuxia Wang, Tao Wang","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_336_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. General anesthesia is a commonly used anesthesia method for breast cancer surgery, and studies have confirmed that general anesthesia can induce immunosuppression in breast cancer patients and increase the metastasis rate of tumors. However, the difference between the effects of intravenous general anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on the function of T-lymphocytes is still controversial, and it is necessary to explore reasonable anesthesia methods to reduce immunosuppression caused by surgery and anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Databases (Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched (up to October 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative inhalation anesthesia and propofol intravenous anesthesia in breast cancer patients, with the outcome of T-lymphocyte subsets. The meta-analysis was performed by STATA 14.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs with 352 patients were included in the study. Compared with inhalation anesthesia, there was no difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between the two groups immediately after surgery, but the activities of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in patients with propofol anesthesia were higher (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.234, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.003-0.466, <i>P</i> = 0.047, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 44.1%) than those under inhalation anesthesia 1 day after surgery, and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> activities in patients with propofol anesthesia were higher (SMD = 304, 95% CI: 0.072-0.537, <i>P</i> = 0.010, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 48.0%) than those under inhalation anesthesia 1 day after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no differences in the effects of propofol and inhalation anesthetics on T-lymphocytes immediately after surgery, but the inhibitory effects of inhalation anesthetics on CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> cells were stronger 1 day after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"28 ","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of propofol intravenous general anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia on T-lymphocyte activity after breast cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daqi Sun, Kunyue Li, Ziqi Chai, Lijuan Wang, Shimin Gu, Na Sun, Yu Zhang, Yuxia Wang, Tao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrms.jrms_336_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. General anesthesia is a commonly used anesthesia method for breast cancer surgery, and studies have confirmed that general anesthesia can induce immunosuppression in breast cancer patients and increase the metastasis rate of tumors. However, the difference between the effects of intravenous general anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on the function of T-lymphocytes is still controversial, and it is necessary to explore reasonable anesthesia methods to reduce immunosuppression caused by surgery and anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Databases (Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched (up to October 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative inhalation anesthesia and propofol intravenous anesthesia in breast cancer patients, with the outcome of T-lymphocyte subsets. The meta-analysis was performed by STATA 14.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs with 352 patients were included in the study. Compared with inhalation anesthesia, there was no difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between the two groups immediately after surgery, but the activities of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in patients with propofol anesthesia were higher (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.234, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.003-0.466, <i>P</i> = 0.047, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 44.1%) than those under inhalation anesthesia 1 day after surgery, and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> activities in patients with propofol anesthesia were higher (SMD = 304, 95% CI: 0.072-0.537, <i>P</i> = 0.010, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 48.0%) than those under inhalation anesthesia 1 day after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no differences in the effects of propofol and inhalation anesthetics on T-lymphocytes immediately after surgery, but the inhibitory effects of inhalation anesthetics on CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> cells were stronger 1 day after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_336_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_336_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌是女性最常见的癌症之一:乳腺癌是女性最常见的癌症之一。全身麻醉是乳腺癌手术常用的麻醉方法,研究证实全身麻醉可诱发乳腺癌患者的免疫抑制,增加肿瘤的转移率。然而,静脉全身麻醉和吸入麻醉对T淋巴细胞功能影响的差异仍存在争议,有必要探索合理的麻醉方法,以减少手术和麻醉造成的免疫抑制:检索数据库(Embase、PubMed、Cochrane Library、CBM、CNKI和万方)(截至2022年10月),以T淋巴细胞亚群为结果,比较乳腺癌患者术中吸入麻醉和异丙酚静脉麻醉的随机对照试验(RCT)。荟萃分析由 STATA 14.0 进行:研究共纳入了 6 项 RCT,352 名患者。与吸入麻醉相比,两组患者术后即刻的 T 淋巴细胞亚群无差异,但丙泊酚麻醉患者的 CD4+ T 细胞活性更高(标准平均差 [SMD] = 0.234,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.003-0.466):异丙酚麻醉患者的 CD4+/CD8+ 活性高于吸入麻醉患者(SMD = 304,95% CI:0.072-0.537,P = 0.010,I2 = 48.0%):结论:异丙酚和吸入麻醉药对术后即刻T淋巴细胞的影响没有差异,但吸入麻醉药对CD4+和CD4+/CD8+细胞的抑制作用在术后1天更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of propofol intravenous general anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia on T-lymphocyte activity after breast cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. General anesthesia is a commonly used anesthesia method for breast cancer surgery, and studies have confirmed that general anesthesia can induce immunosuppression in breast cancer patients and increase the metastasis rate of tumors. However, the difference between the effects of intravenous general anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on the function of T-lymphocytes is still controversial, and it is necessary to explore reasonable anesthesia methods to reduce immunosuppression caused by surgery and anesthesia.

Materials and methods: Databases (Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched (up to October 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative inhalation anesthesia and propofol intravenous anesthesia in breast cancer patients, with the outcome of T-lymphocyte subsets. The meta-analysis was performed by STATA 14.0.

Results: Six RCTs with 352 patients were included in the study. Compared with inhalation anesthesia, there was no difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between the two groups immediately after surgery, but the activities of CD4+ T cells in patients with propofol anesthesia were higher (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.234, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.003-0.466, P = 0.047, I2 = 44.1%) than those under inhalation anesthesia 1 day after surgery, and CD4+/CD8+ activities in patients with propofol anesthesia were higher (SMD = 304, 95% CI: 0.072-0.537, P = 0.010, I2 = 48.0%) than those under inhalation anesthesia 1 day after surgery.

Conclusion: There were no differences in the effects of propofol and inhalation anesthetics on T-lymphocytes immediately after surgery, but the inhibitory effects of inhalation anesthetics on CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ cells were stronger 1 day after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信