使用 "篮状编织法 "在唇裂初次修复中重建口轮匝肌的长期效果。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Masahiro Sasaki, Shinji Togashi, Yukiko Aihara, Kaoru Sasaki, Yoichiro Shibuya, Junya Oshima, Mitsuru Sekido
{"title":"使用 \"篮状编织法 \"在唇裂初次修复中重建口轮匝肌的长期效果。","authors":"Masahiro Sasaki, Shinji Togashi, Yukiko Aihara, Kaoru Sasaki, Yoichiro Shibuya, Junya Oshima, Mitsuru Sekido","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.86.1.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The basket-weave method is an orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction method used in primary unilateral cleft lip repair. We compared the long-term results of the basket-weave method with those of a conventional method. For primary unilateral cleft lip repair, we compared the long-term results of 7 cases in which the orbicularis oris muscle was reconstructed by use of the basket-weave method, and of 7 cases in which the reconstruction was performed by use of the conventional method. The average postoperative follow-up period was 12 years and 7 months for the basket-weave method, and 11 years and 9 months for the conventional method. Using photographs of the front and elevation angle views, we evaluated the results as good if the philtrum ridge was formed on the fissure side and was almost symmetrical in height; as fair if the philtrum ridge was lower than the normal side; and as poor if the philtrum ridge had disappeared. For the basket-weave method, the results were good in 6 cases (85.7%), fair in 1 case (14.3%), and poor in 0 cases. For the conventional method, the results were good in 2 cases (28.6%), fair in 4 cases (57.1%), and poor in 1 case (14.3%). A significant difference was found between the 2 groups (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.0417). The philtrum ridge shape could be reconstructed by use of the basket-weave method, which gave better results in the long-term than did the conventional method for orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction in primary unilateral cleft lip repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 1","pages":"64-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10945217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term results of orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction in primary cleft lip repair using the \\\"basket-weave method\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Sasaki, Shinji Togashi, Yukiko Aihara, Kaoru Sasaki, Yoichiro Shibuya, Junya Oshima, Mitsuru Sekido\",\"doi\":\"10.18999/nagjms.86.1.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The basket-weave method is an orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction method used in primary unilateral cleft lip repair. We compared the long-term results of the basket-weave method with those of a conventional method. For primary unilateral cleft lip repair, we compared the long-term results of 7 cases in which the orbicularis oris muscle was reconstructed by use of the basket-weave method, and of 7 cases in which the reconstruction was performed by use of the conventional method. The average postoperative follow-up period was 12 years and 7 months for the basket-weave method, and 11 years and 9 months for the conventional method. Using photographs of the front and elevation angle views, we evaluated the results as good if the philtrum ridge was formed on the fissure side and was almost symmetrical in height; as fair if the philtrum ridge was lower than the normal side; and as poor if the philtrum ridge had disappeared. For the basket-weave method, the results were good in 6 cases (85.7%), fair in 1 case (14.3%), and poor in 0 cases. For the conventional method, the results were good in 2 cases (28.6%), fair in 4 cases (57.1%), and poor in 1 case (14.3%). A significant difference was found between the 2 groups (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.0417). The philtrum ridge shape could be reconstructed by use of the basket-weave method, which gave better results in the long-term than did the conventional method for orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction in primary unilateral cleft lip repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"64-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10945217/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.1.64\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.1.64","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

篮状编织法是一种用于单侧唇裂初次修复的口轮匝肌重建方法。我们比较了篮状编织法和传统方法的长期效果。在原发性单侧唇裂修复术中,我们比较了使用篮状编织法重建口轮匝肌的 7 例病例和使用传统方法重建口轮匝肌的 7 例病例的长期效果。篮状编织法的平均术后随访时间为12年零7个月,传统方法为11年零9个月。通过正面和仰角切面的照片,如果咽鼓膜嵴在裂隙一侧形成,且高度基本对称,我们将结果评为良好;如果咽鼓膜嵴低于正常一侧,我们将结果评为一般;如果咽鼓膜嵴消失,我们将结果评为较差。在篮织法中,结果良好的有 6 例(85.7%),一般的有 1 例(14.3%),差的有 0 例。传统方法有 2 例效果良好(28.6%),4 例效果一般(57.1%),1 例效果较差(14.3%)。两组之间存在明显差异(Mann-Whitney U 检验,P = 0.0417)。在原发性单侧唇裂修复中,使用篮状编织法可以重建咽鼓管嵴的形状,与传统的口轮匝肌重建方法相比,这种方法的长期效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term results of orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction in primary cleft lip repair using the "basket-weave method".

The basket-weave method is an orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction method used in primary unilateral cleft lip repair. We compared the long-term results of the basket-weave method with those of a conventional method. For primary unilateral cleft lip repair, we compared the long-term results of 7 cases in which the orbicularis oris muscle was reconstructed by use of the basket-weave method, and of 7 cases in which the reconstruction was performed by use of the conventional method. The average postoperative follow-up period was 12 years and 7 months for the basket-weave method, and 11 years and 9 months for the conventional method. Using photographs of the front and elevation angle views, we evaluated the results as good if the philtrum ridge was formed on the fissure side and was almost symmetrical in height; as fair if the philtrum ridge was lower than the normal side; and as poor if the philtrum ridge had disappeared. For the basket-weave method, the results were good in 6 cases (85.7%), fair in 1 case (14.3%), and poor in 0 cases. For the conventional method, the results were good in 2 cases (28.6%), fair in 4 cases (57.1%), and poor in 1 case (14.3%). A significant difference was found between the 2 groups (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.0417). The philtrum ridge shape could be reconstructed by use of the basket-weave method, which gave better results in the long-term than did the conventional method for orbicularis oris muscle reconstruction in primary unilateral cleft lip repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信