门静脉栓塞术后诊断为不可切除的胆管癌患者临床病程分析:病例系列。

Q4 Medicine
Kurume Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-02 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7012001
Hajime Imamura, Tomohiko Adachi, Hajime Matsushima, Hideki Ishimaru, Masayuki Fukumoto, Kyohei Yoshino, Kunihiro Matsuguma, Ryo Matsumoto, Takanobu Hara, Akihiko Soyama, Masaaki Hidaka, Susumu Eguchi
{"title":"门静脉栓塞术后诊断为不可切除的胆管癌患者临床病程分析:病例系列。","authors":"Hajime Imamura, Tomohiko Adachi, Hajime Matsushima, Hideki Ishimaru, Masayuki Fukumoto, Kyohei Yoshino, Kunihiro Matsuguma, Ryo Matsumoto, Takanobu Hara, Akihiko Soyama, Masaaki Hidaka, Susumu Eguchi","doi":"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7012001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended as a preoperative procedure for patients with biliary tract cancer scheduled to undergo hepatic resection of more than 50%-60% of the liver. However, details and/or information regarding the follow-up of unresectable cases are often lacking, and the clinical course of unresectable cases is not well analyzed and reported. This study aimed to clarify the clinical prognosis of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer after PVE. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical backgrounds of patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE without subsequent resection between January 2011 and October 2022. Of the 21 patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE during the study period, eight (38%) cases were unsuitable for resection after PVE for the following reasons: intraoperatively detected dissemination (n=2), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (n=1), liver metastasis (n=1), decreased liver function (n=2), development of liver metastasis while waiting (n=1), and insufficient residual liver volume (n=1). All patients received subsequent chemotherapy, including gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy in three cases, gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus S-1 in three cases, and gemcitabine plus cisplatin or S-1+cisplatin in one case each. As there is currently no curative treatment for biliary tract cancer other than surgery, multidisciplinary management and treatment of patient factors, including tumor factors and liver function, are essential to reducing the number of unresectable cases after PVE.</p>","PeriodicalId":39559,"journal":{"name":"Kurume Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Clinical Course in a Population of Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer Diagnosed as Unresectable After Portal Vein Embolization: A Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Hajime Imamura, Tomohiko Adachi, Hajime Matsushima, Hideki Ishimaru, Masayuki Fukumoto, Kyohei Yoshino, Kunihiro Matsuguma, Ryo Matsumoto, Takanobu Hara, Akihiko Soyama, Masaaki Hidaka, Susumu Eguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7012001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended as a preoperative procedure for patients with biliary tract cancer scheduled to undergo hepatic resection of more than 50%-60% of the liver. However, details and/or information regarding the follow-up of unresectable cases are often lacking, and the clinical course of unresectable cases is not well analyzed and reported. This study aimed to clarify the clinical prognosis of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer after PVE. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical backgrounds of patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE without subsequent resection between January 2011 and October 2022. Of the 21 patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE during the study period, eight (38%) cases were unsuitable for resection after PVE for the following reasons: intraoperatively detected dissemination (n=2), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (n=1), liver metastasis (n=1), decreased liver function (n=2), development of liver metastasis while waiting (n=1), and insufficient residual liver volume (n=1). All patients received subsequent chemotherapy, including gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy in three cases, gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus S-1 in three cases, and gemcitabine plus cisplatin or S-1+cisplatin in one case each. As there is currently no curative treatment for biliary tract cancer other than surgery, multidisciplinary management and treatment of patient factors, including tumor factors and liver function, are essential to reducing the number of unresectable cases after PVE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kurume Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"77-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kurume Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7012001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurume Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS7012001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

门静脉栓塞术(PVE)被推荐作为胆道癌患者的术前手术,计划对超过50%-60%的肝脏进行肝切除。然而,关于无法切除病例的随访细节和/或信息往往缺乏,对无法切除病例的临床过程也没有很好的分析和报告。本研究旨在明确PVE术后不可切除胆道癌患者的临床预后。我们回顾性分析了2011年1月至2022年10月期间接受PVE治疗但未进行后续切除术的胆道癌患者的临床背景。在研究期间接受PVE的21例胆道癌患者中,有8例(38%)不适合在PVE后进行切除,原因如下:术中发现扩散(2例)、主动脉旁淋巴结转移(1例)、肝转移(1例)、肝功能减退(2例)、等待期间出现肝转移(1例)和残肝体积不足(1例)。所有患者均接受了后续化疗,其中吉西他滨加S-1治疗3例,吉西他滨加顺铂加S-1治疗3例,吉西他滨加顺铂或S-1+顺铂治疗各1例。由于胆道癌目前除手术治疗外没有其他根治性治疗方法,因此多学科管理和患者因素(包括肿瘤因素和肝功能)治疗对于减少 PVE 后无法切除病例的数量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Clinical Course in a Population of Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer Diagnosed as Unresectable After Portal Vein Embolization: A Case Series.

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended as a preoperative procedure for patients with biliary tract cancer scheduled to undergo hepatic resection of more than 50%-60% of the liver. However, details and/or information regarding the follow-up of unresectable cases are often lacking, and the clinical course of unresectable cases is not well analyzed and reported. This study aimed to clarify the clinical prognosis of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer after PVE. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical backgrounds of patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE without subsequent resection between January 2011 and October 2022. Of the 21 patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent PVE during the study period, eight (38%) cases were unsuitable for resection after PVE for the following reasons: intraoperatively detected dissemination (n=2), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (n=1), liver metastasis (n=1), decreased liver function (n=2), development of liver metastasis while waiting (n=1), and insufficient residual liver volume (n=1). All patients received subsequent chemotherapy, including gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy in three cases, gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus S-1 in three cases, and gemcitabine plus cisplatin or S-1+cisplatin in one case each. As there is currently no curative treatment for biliary tract cancer other than surgery, multidisciplinary management and treatment of patient factors, including tumor factors and liver function, are essential to reducing the number of unresectable cases after PVE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kurume Medical Journal
Kurume Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信