腰椎安全三角区:3.0T 磁共振成像中冠状面和冠状斜面的比较研究。

Q3 Medicine
Fernando Augusto Dannebrock, Erasmo de Abreu Zardo, Marcus Sofia Ziegler, Emiliano Vialle, Ricardo Bernardi Soder, Carla Helena Augustin Schwanke
{"title":"腰椎安全三角区:3.0T 磁共振成像中冠状面和冠状斜面的比较研究。","authors":"Fernando Augusto Dannebrock, Erasmo de Abreu Zardo, Marcus Sofia Ziegler, Emiliano Vialle, Ricardo Bernardi Soder, Carla Helena Augustin Schwanke","doi":"10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the measurements of the lumbar safety triangle (Kambin's triangle) and the invasion of the dorsal root ganglion in the triangle in coronal and coronal oblique planes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study, in which 210 3.0-T magnetic resonance images of L2-L5 were analyzed in coronal and coronal oblique planes. Exams with lumbar spine anomalies were excluded. Demographic (sex and age) and radiological variables were recorded by a single evaluator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most sample was female (57.1%), mean age 45.5 ± 13.3 (18-98 years). The measurements average, as well as the areas, gradually increased from L2 to L5. The dorsal root ganglion invaded the triangle in all images. The safety triangle average area was smaller in the coronal oblique plane than in the coronal plane. Of the seven dimensions of safety triangle obtained for each level of the lumbar spine, six were significantly smaller in the coronal oblique plane than in the coronal plane. The only dimension that showed no difference was the smallest ganglion dimension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dimensions and areas investigated were smaller in coronal oblique plane, especially the area (difference > 1 mm). The analysis of the triangular zone in this plane becomes important in the preoperative assessment of minimally invasive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20842,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Brasileira","volume":"56 6","pages":"327-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar safety triangle: comparative study of coronal and coronal oblique planes in 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Augusto Dannebrock, Erasmo de Abreu Zardo, Marcus Sofia Ziegler, Emiliano Vialle, Ricardo Bernardi Soder, Carla Helena Augustin Schwanke\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the measurements of the lumbar safety triangle (Kambin's triangle) and the invasion of the dorsal root ganglion in the triangle in coronal and coronal oblique planes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study, in which 210 3.0-T magnetic resonance images of L2-L5 were analyzed in coronal and coronal oblique planes. Exams with lumbar spine anomalies were excluded. Demographic (sex and age) and radiological variables were recorded by a single evaluator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most sample was female (57.1%), mean age 45.5 ± 13.3 (18-98 years). The measurements average, as well as the areas, gradually increased from L2 to L5. The dorsal root ganglion invaded the triangle in all images. The safety triangle average area was smaller in the coronal oblique plane than in the coronal plane. Of the seven dimensions of safety triangle obtained for each level of the lumbar spine, six were significantly smaller in the coronal oblique plane than in the coronal plane. The only dimension that showed no difference was the smallest ganglion dimension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dimensions and areas investigated were smaller in coronal oblique plane, especially the area (difference > 1 mm). The analysis of the triangular zone in this plane becomes important in the preoperative assessment of minimally invasive procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"56 6\",\"pages\":\"327-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948153/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要比较腰椎安全三角区(Kambin's 三角区)在冠状面和冠状面斜面上的测量结果以及背根神经节在三角区内的侵犯情况:这是一项横断面研究,在冠状面和冠状面斜切面上分析了 210 幅 3.0-T 的腰椎 L2-L5 磁共振图像。排除了腰椎异常的检查。人口统计学变量(性别和年龄)和放射学变量由一名评估人员记录:大多数样本为女性(57.1%),平均年龄为 45.5 ± 13.3(18-98 岁)。测量的平均值和面积从 L2 到 L5 逐渐增加。在所有图像中,背根神经节都侵入了三角区。安全三角区的平均面积在冠状斜面上小于冠状面。在腰椎各层安全三角区的七个维度中,冠状斜面上的六个维度明显小于冠状面上的维度。唯一没有差异的是最小神经节尺寸:结论:所研究的尺寸和面积在冠状斜面上都较小,尤其是面积(差异大于 1 毫米)。分析该平面的三角区对于微创手术的术前评估非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lumbar safety triangle: comparative study of coronal and coronal oblique planes in 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging.

Objective: To compare the measurements of the lumbar safety triangle (Kambin's triangle) and the invasion of the dorsal root ganglion in the triangle in coronal and coronal oblique planes.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study, in which 210 3.0-T magnetic resonance images of L2-L5 were analyzed in coronal and coronal oblique planes. Exams with lumbar spine anomalies were excluded. Demographic (sex and age) and radiological variables were recorded by a single evaluator.

Results: Most sample was female (57.1%), mean age 45.5 ± 13.3 (18-98 years). The measurements average, as well as the areas, gradually increased from L2 to L5. The dorsal root ganglion invaded the triangle in all images. The safety triangle average area was smaller in the coronal oblique plane than in the coronal plane. Of the seven dimensions of safety triangle obtained for each level of the lumbar spine, six were significantly smaller in the coronal oblique plane than in the coronal plane. The only dimension that showed no difference was the smallest ganglion dimension.

Conclusion: The dimensions and areas investigated were smaller in coronal oblique plane, especially the area (difference > 1 mm). The analysis of the triangular zone in this plane becomes important in the preoperative assessment of minimally invasive procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Brasileira
Radiologia Brasileira Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信