小儿下肢缺损人群的心理健康筛查。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13156
Emily Marshall, Eileen Shieh, Jeanne M Franzone, Paul T Enlow
{"title":"小儿下肢缺损人群的心理健康筛查。","authors":"Emily Marshall, Eileen Shieh, Jeanne M Franzone, Paul T Enlow","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth with lower limb deficiency (LLD) may be at increased risk for mental health difficulties. However, guidelines around psychosocial screening are not well established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the implementation and results of a mental health screening process in a multidisciplinary prosthetics clinic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient specialty care clinic located within a children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All patients ages 0-18 years with LLD seen at a monthly multidisciplinary prosthetics clinic between September 2019 and January 2023 (n = 75).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Quality of life was measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric proxy survey. Psychological functioning was measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of patients who endorsed clinically significant concerns. Of the 75 clinic visits during the study time frame, the psychosocial screeners were completed at 38 (51%). A total of 25 unique patients completed the screeners; 12 patients completed the screener more than once. The most commonly endorsed concerns on the PROMIS were issues with physical mobility (65%) and upper extremity function (40%). The SDQ revealed that a majority (62.5%) of the screened patients had an overall score above the clinical cutoff, indicating psychosocial distress in more than one area. The most commonly reported mental health concern was peer problems (62.5%). Post hoc analysis of repeat screenings indicated that most problems identified during the first screening persisted at follow-up screenings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically significant psychological concerns were common among the sample, indicating the need to address this aspect of patients' well-being. Preliminary data on repeat screenings suggest that clinically significant concerns may not self-resolve. Routine psychosocial screening is critical for early identification of mental health problems and timely referral to evidence-based psychological interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health screening in pediatric lower limb deficiency population.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Marshall, Eileen Shieh, Jeanne M Franzone, Paul T Enlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth with lower limb deficiency (LLD) may be at increased risk for mental health difficulties. However, guidelines around psychosocial screening are not well established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the implementation and results of a mental health screening process in a multidisciplinary prosthetics clinic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient specialty care clinic located within a children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All patients ages 0-18 years with LLD seen at a monthly multidisciplinary prosthetics clinic between September 2019 and January 2023 (n = 75).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Quality of life was measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric proxy survey. Psychological functioning was measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of patients who endorsed clinically significant concerns. Of the 75 clinic visits during the study time frame, the psychosocial screeners were completed at 38 (51%). A total of 25 unique patients completed the screeners; 12 patients completed the screener more than once. The most commonly endorsed concerns on the PROMIS were issues with physical mobility (65%) and upper extremity function (40%). The SDQ revealed that a majority (62.5%) of the screened patients had an overall score above the clinical cutoff, indicating psychosocial distress in more than one area. The most commonly reported mental health concern was peer problems (62.5%). Post hoc analysis of repeat screenings indicated that most problems identified during the first screening persisted at follow-up screenings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically significant psychological concerns were common among the sample, indicating the need to address this aspect of patients' well-being. Preliminary data on repeat screenings suggest that clinically significant concerns may not self-resolve. Routine psychosocial screening is critical for early identification of mental health problems and timely referral to evidence-based psychological interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1095-1104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有下肢缺损症(LLD)的青少年出现心理健康问题的风险可能会增加。然而,有关社会心理筛查的指导原则尚未得到很好的确立:描述多学科义肢诊所心理健康筛查流程的实施情况和结果:设计:调查:地点:儿童医院内的专科门诊:2019年9月至2023年1月期间每月在多学科假肢门诊就诊的所有0-18岁LLD患者(n = 75).干预措施:主要结果测量:生活质量通过患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)儿科代理调查进行测量。心理功能采用优势与困难问卷(SDQ)进行测量:采用描述性统计方法确定了表示有重大临床问题的患者比例。在研究期间的 75 次门诊中,有 38 次(51%)完成了社会心理筛查。共有 25 名患者完成了筛查,其中 12 名患者不止一次完成筛查。在 PROMIS 中,最常见的问题是身体活动能力问题(65%)和上肢功能问题(40%)。SDQ 显示,大多数(62.5%)接受筛查的患者的总分高于临床临界值,这表明他们在不止一个方面存在心理社会问题。最常报告的心理健康问题是同伴问题(62.5%)。对重复筛查进行的事后分析表明,第一次筛查中发现的大多数问题在后续筛查中仍然存在:结论:在样本中,具有临床意义的心理问题很常见,这表明有必要解决患者这方面的问题。重复筛查的初步数据表明,具有临床意义的问题可能不会自行缓解。常规社会心理筛查对于及早发现心理健康问题和及时转介到循证心理干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental health screening in pediatric lower limb deficiency population.

Background: Youth with lower limb deficiency (LLD) may be at increased risk for mental health difficulties. However, guidelines around psychosocial screening are not well established.

Objective: To describe the implementation and results of a mental health screening process in a multidisciplinary prosthetics clinic.

Design: Survey.

Setting: Outpatient specialty care clinic located within a children's hospital.

Patients: All patients ages 0-18 years with LLD seen at a monthly multidisciplinary prosthetics clinic between September 2019 and January 2023 (n = 75).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcomes measures: Quality of life was measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric proxy survey. Psychological functioning was measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).

Results: Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of patients who endorsed clinically significant concerns. Of the 75 clinic visits during the study time frame, the psychosocial screeners were completed at 38 (51%). A total of 25 unique patients completed the screeners; 12 patients completed the screener more than once. The most commonly endorsed concerns on the PROMIS were issues with physical mobility (65%) and upper extremity function (40%). The SDQ revealed that a majority (62.5%) of the screened patients had an overall score above the clinical cutoff, indicating psychosocial distress in more than one area. The most commonly reported mental health concern was peer problems (62.5%). Post hoc analysis of repeat screenings indicated that most problems identified during the first screening persisted at follow-up screenings.

Conclusions: Clinically significant psychological concerns were common among the sample, indicating the need to address this aspect of patients' well-being. Preliminary data on repeat screenings suggest that clinically significant concerns may not self-resolve. Routine psychosocial screening is critical for early identification of mental health problems and timely referral to evidence-based psychological interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信