大规模治疗对淋病、衣原体和梅毒长期发病率的影响--系统综述。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1177/09564624241239994
Thibaut Vanbaelen, Sheeba S Manoharan-Basil, Chris Kenyon
{"title":"大规模治疗对淋病、衣原体和梅毒长期发病率的影响--系统综述。","authors":"Thibaut Vanbaelen, Sheeba S Manoharan-Basil, Chris Kenyon","doi":"10.1177/09564624241239994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective mass treatment of STIs may lead to a durable reduction in the prevalence of STIs or a temporary reduction associated with an increased probability of antimicrobial resistance emerging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies evaluating the impact of mass STI treatment on the long-term prevalence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and chancroid. The primary outcomes were the long term (≥3 months post the intervention) impact of the intervention on prevalence/incidence of the STI and on antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 269 studies, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. With the exception of the Carletonville study, where this was not assessed, three of the four studies found that intensive STI treatment was associated with a reduced prevalence of the targeted STI during or immediately after the intervention. In all four studies, there was no evidence that the intense treatment had a long-term effect on prevalence. In the only study where this was assessed, the intensive use of penicillin to reduce gonococcal prevalence was associated with the emergence of reduced susceptibility to penicillin in <i>N. gonorrhoeae.</i></p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The available evidence suggests that mass treatment of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis in high prevalence populations is only associated with a temporary reduction in the prevalence of these infections and may select for antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of mass treatment on the long-term prevalence of gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis-a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Thibaut Vanbaelen, Sheeba S Manoharan-Basil, Chris Kenyon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09564624241239994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective mass treatment of STIs may lead to a durable reduction in the prevalence of STIs or a temporary reduction associated with an increased probability of antimicrobial resistance emerging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies evaluating the impact of mass STI treatment on the long-term prevalence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and chancroid. The primary outcomes were the long term (≥3 months post the intervention) impact of the intervention on prevalence/incidence of the STI and on antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 269 studies, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. With the exception of the Carletonville study, where this was not assessed, three of the four studies found that intensive STI treatment was associated with a reduced prevalence of the targeted STI during or immediately after the intervention. In all four studies, there was no evidence that the intense treatment had a long-term effect on prevalence. In the only study where this was assessed, the intensive use of penicillin to reduce gonococcal prevalence was associated with the emergence of reduced susceptibility to penicillin in <i>N. gonorrhoeae.</i></p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The available evidence suggests that mass treatment of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis in high prevalence populations is only associated with a temporary reduction in the prevalence of these infections and may select for antimicrobial resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624241239994\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624241239994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择性地大规模治疗性传播疾病可能会导致性传播疾病患病率的持久下降,也可能会导致与抗菌药耐药性出现概率增加相关的暂时性下降:我们在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 上搜索了评估大规模性传播感染治疗对衣原体、淋病、梅毒和软下疳长期患病率影响的研究。主要结果是干预对性传播感染流行率/发病率和抗菌药耐药性的长期(干预后≥3个月)影响:我们搜索到 269 项研究,其中 4 项符合纳入标准。除 Carletonville 研究未对此进行评估外,四项研究中有三项发现,在干预期间或干预后不久,强化性传播感染治疗与目标性传播感染发病率的降低有关。在所有四项研究中,没有证据表明强化治疗对患病率有长期影响。在唯一一项对此进行评估的研究中,密集使用青霉素降低淋球菌感染率与淋球菌对青霉素的敏感性降低有关:现有证据表明,在高感染率人群中对衣原体、淋病和梅毒进行大规模治疗只能暂时降低这些感染的流行率,而且可能会产生抗菌素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of mass treatment on the long-term prevalence of gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis-a systematic review.

Background: Selective mass treatment of STIs may lead to a durable reduction in the prevalence of STIs or a temporary reduction associated with an increased probability of antimicrobial resistance emerging.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies evaluating the impact of mass STI treatment on the long-term prevalence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and chancroid. The primary outcomes were the long term (≥3 months post the intervention) impact of the intervention on prevalence/incidence of the STI and on antimicrobial resistance.

Results: Our search yielded 269 studies, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. With the exception of the Carletonville study, where this was not assessed, three of the four studies found that intensive STI treatment was associated with a reduced prevalence of the targeted STI during or immediately after the intervention. In all four studies, there was no evidence that the intense treatment had a long-term effect on prevalence. In the only study where this was assessed, the intensive use of penicillin to reduce gonococcal prevalence was associated with the emergence of reduced susceptibility to penicillin in N. gonorrhoeae.

Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that mass treatment of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis in high prevalence populations is only associated with a temporary reduction in the prevalence of these infections and may select for antimicrobial resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信