Pucheng Ke, Ralph A Stidham, Marisol S Castaneto, Adrienne M Forbes, Robert L Fathke, Robert B Crochet, Jeremy W Lewis, Matthew D Wegner, Stephanie L Mont
{"title":"人类红细胞乙酰胆碱酯酶活性:十五年后的重访。","authors":"Pucheng Ke, Ralph A Stidham, Marisol S Castaneto, Adrienne M Forbes, Robert L Fathke, Robert B Crochet, Jeremy W Lewis, Matthew D Wegner, Stephanie L Mont","doi":"10.1080/01480545.2024.2329752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (RBC-AChE) activity is valuable for detecting potential exposure to cholinesterase inhibiting substances (CIS). A reliable population-based RBC-AChE activity reference range is critical for early and massive clinical and occupational toxicology screening. Previous published studies were often limited to small numbers of subjects, various testing methods, and crude statistical data analyses. We tested 4818 adult subjects with a well-established 17-minute modified Michel method over a 2-year period. We conducted a retrospective data analysis and systematically investigated on the influences to testing values from gender, age, age group, and their combinations and interactions. No significant difference was observed in the testing values between males (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.80 ΔpH/h, respectively) and females (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.81 ΔpH/hour, respectively), when gender was the only factor considered (<i>p</i> = 0.7238). However, with age progression, male testing values exhibited a consistent upward trend, while females did not show any clear patterns. Linear regression analysis of the data revealed that gender, age, and age group more or less affected testing values either as independent variables or with their combinations and interactions. However, more potential factors need to be included to achieve better testing value predictions. We recommend the toxicological testing community to adopt a new set of age group specific RBC-AChE activity reference ranges for males (0.68-0.80, 0.69-0.81, 0.70-0.83, 0.71-0.84, and 0.73-0.87 ΔpH/h for 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60 years old, respectively) while keeping the current reference range (0.63-0.89 ΔpH/hour) for females.</p>","PeriodicalId":11333,"journal":{"name":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1050-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity: a revisit after fifteen years.\",\"authors\":\"Pucheng Ke, Ralph A Stidham, Marisol S Castaneto, Adrienne M Forbes, Robert L Fathke, Robert B Crochet, Jeremy W Lewis, Matthew D Wegner, Stephanie L Mont\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01480545.2024.2329752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (RBC-AChE) activity is valuable for detecting potential exposure to cholinesterase inhibiting substances (CIS). A reliable population-based RBC-AChE activity reference range is critical for early and massive clinical and occupational toxicology screening. Previous published studies were often limited to small numbers of subjects, various testing methods, and crude statistical data analyses. We tested 4818 adult subjects with a well-established 17-minute modified Michel method over a 2-year period. We conducted a retrospective data analysis and systematically investigated on the influences to testing values from gender, age, age group, and their combinations and interactions. No significant difference was observed in the testing values between males (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.80 ΔpH/h, respectively) and females (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.81 ΔpH/hour, respectively), when gender was the only factor considered (<i>p</i> = 0.7238). However, with age progression, male testing values exhibited a consistent upward trend, while females did not show any clear patterns. Linear regression analysis of the data revealed that gender, age, and age group more or less affected testing values either as independent variables or with their combinations and interactions. However, more potential factors need to be included to achieve better testing value predictions. We recommend the toxicological testing community to adopt a new set of age group specific RBC-AChE activity reference ranges for males (0.68-0.80, 0.69-0.81, 0.70-0.83, 0.71-0.84, and 0.73-0.87 ΔpH/h for 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60 years old, respectively) while keeping the current reference range (0.63-0.89 ΔpH/hour) for females.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and Chemical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1050-1057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and Chemical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2024.2329752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2024.2329752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity: a revisit after fifteen years.
Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (RBC-AChE) activity is valuable for detecting potential exposure to cholinesterase inhibiting substances (CIS). A reliable population-based RBC-AChE activity reference range is critical for early and massive clinical and occupational toxicology screening. Previous published studies were often limited to small numbers of subjects, various testing methods, and crude statistical data analyses. We tested 4818 adult subjects with a well-established 17-minute modified Michel method over a 2-year period. We conducted a retrospective data analysis and systematically investigated on the influences to testing values from gender, age, age group, and their combinations and interactions. No significant difference was observed in the testing values between males (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.80 ΔpH/h, respectively) and females (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.81 ΔpH/hour, respectively), when gender was the only factor considered (p = 0.7238). However, with age progression, male testing values exhibited a consistent upward trend, while females did not show any clear patterns. Linear regression analysis of the data revealed that gender, age, and age group more or less affected testing values either as independent variables or with their combinations and interactions. However, more potential factors need to be included to achieve better testing value predictions. We recommend the toxicological testing community to adopt a new set of age group specific RBC-AChE activity reference ranges for males (0.68-0.80, 0.69-0.81, 0.70-0.83, 0.71-0.84, and 0.73-0.87 ΔpH/h for 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60 years old, respectively) while keeping the current reference range (0.63-0.89 ΔpH/hour) for females.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Chemical Toxicology publishes full-length research papers, review articles and short communications that encompass a broad spectrum of toxicological data surrounding risk assessment and harmful exposure. Manuscripts are considered according to their relevance to the journal.
Topics include both descriptive and mechanics research that illustrates the risk assessment implications of exposure to toxic agents. Examples of suitable topics include toxicological studies, which are structural examinations on the effects of dose, metabolism, and statistical or mechanism-based approaches to risk assessment. New findings and methods, along with safety evaluations, are also acceptable. Special issues may be reserved to publish symposium summaries, reviews in toxicology, and overviews of the practical interpretation and application of toxicological data.