{"title":"微地震中各向异性孔弹性波方程的改进数值解法:图形处理单元加速度和力矩张量的实现","authors":"Jing Zheng, Tiezhu Li, Jingyu Xie, Yuan Sun","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.13500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accuracy and computational efficiency of full waveform forward modelling in poroelastic media are crucial for microseismic monitoring. It enables intuitive, precise and efficient simulation of subsurface responses, thereby improving the reliability of moment tensor inversion and seismic source mechanism interpretation. Additionally, it reflects the role of fluid effects in waveform evolution. In this paper, based on the Biot mechanism, we derived the first-order velocity–stress equation of poroelastic media and discretized the model using a rotated staggered grid. The rotated staggered grid can well adapt to anisotropic media with high contrast parameters. We provide the finite difference formula based on graphic process unit–acceleration and moment tensor and also provide the graphic process unit workflow for forward modelling of anisotropic poroelastic media. First, two models with different grid sizes were run based on single graphic process unit, 1-thread Central Processing Unit (CPU) and 16-thread CPU. The results show that the speedup factors are approximately 14.3 and 3.7, respectively, compared with the running time of 1-thread CPU and 16-thread CPU. Then, we compare and evaluate the response of three basic source mechanisms (isotropic expansion, double couple and compensated linear vector dipole) in the model. The comparison of analytical and numerical results verifies the effectiveness of the method. Furthermore, wavefield snapshots of two typical anisotropic media (vertical transversely isotropic and horizontal transversely isotropic) are analysed to correspond to different moment tensor sources. The results showed that the source mechanism does not change the isotropic and anisotropic plane and the wave travel time, but it does change the polarization amplitude of the velocity component. The attenuation of slow qP-wave increases along with the increase of the value of viscosity. The effect of permeability on wavefield appears with the opposite effect of viscosity. Finally, the seismic waveform differences between multi-layer elastic media and poroelastic media are compared and analysed. The results showed that the seismic wavefield and waveform of poroelastic media are more complex, the propagation speed of seismic waves is faster, but the attenuation of seismic waves is stronger.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved numerical solution of anisotropic poroelastic wave equation in microseismicity: Graphic process unit acceleration and moment tensor implementation\",\"authors\":\"Jing Zheng, Tiezhu Li, Jingyu Xie, Yuan Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2478.13500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The accuracy and computational efficiency of full waveform forward modelling in poroelastic media are crucial for microseismic monitoring. It enables intuitive, precise and efficient simulation of subsurface responses, thereby improving the reliability of moment tensor inversion and seismic source mechanism interpretation. Additionally, it reflects the role of fluid effects in waveform evolution. In this paper, based on the Biot mechanism, we derived the first-order velocity–stress equation of poroelastic media and discretized the model using a rotated staggered grid. The rotated staggered grid can well adapt to anisotropic media with high contrast parameters. We provide the finite difference formula based on graphic process unit–acceleration and moment tensor and also provide the graphic process unit workflow for forward modelling of anisotropic poroelastic media. First, two models with different grid sizes were run based on single graphic process unit, 1-thread Central Processing Unit (CPU) and 16-thread CPU. The results show that the speedup factors are approximately 14.3 and 3.7, respectively, compared with the running time of 1-thread CPU and 16-thread CPU. Then, we compare and evaluate the response of three basic source mechanisms (isotropic expansion, double couple and compensated linear vector dipole) in the model. The comparison of analytical and numerical results verifies the effectiveness of the method. Furthermore, wavefield snapshots of two typical anisotropic media (vertical transversely isotropic and horizontal transversely isotropic) are analysed to correspond to different moment tensor sources. The results showed that the source mechanism does not change the isotropic and anisotropic plane and the wave travel time, but it does change the polarization amplitude of the velocity component. The attenuation of slow qP-wave increases along with the increase of the value of viscosity. The effect of permeability on wavefield appears with the opposite effect of viscosity. Finally, the seismic waveform differences between multi-layer elastic media and poroelastic media are compared and analysed. The results showed that the seismic wavefield and waveform of poroelastic media are more complex, the propagation speed of seismic waves is faster, but the attenuation of seismic waves is stronger.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Prospecting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Prospecting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
孔弹性介质全波形前向建模的准确性和计算效率对微地震监测至关重要。它能直观、精确、高效地模拟地下响应,从而提高力矩张量反演和震源机制解释的可靠性。此外,它还反映了流体效应在波形演变中的作用。本文以 Biot 机理为基础,推导了孔弹性介质的一阶速度-应力方程,并使用旋转交错网格对模型进行了离散化处理。旋转交错网格能很好地适应各向异性介质的高对比参数。我们提供了基于图形处理单元-加速度和力矩张量的有限差分公式,还提供了各向异性孔弹性介质正演建模的图形处理单元工作流程。首先,基于单图形处理器、1 线程中央处理器(CPU)和 16 线程 CPU 运行了两个不同网格大小的模型。结果表明,与 1 线程 CPU 和 16 线程 CPU 的运行时间相比,速度分别提高了约 14.3 和 3.7 倍。然后,我们比较并评估了模型中三种基本源机制(各向同性膨胀、双耦合和补偿线性矢量偶极子)的响应。分析和数值结果的对比验证了该方法的有效性。此外,还分析了两种典型各向异性介质(垂直横向各向同性介质和水平横向各向同性介质)的波场快照,以对应不同的力矩张量源。结果表明,波源机制不会改变各向同性和各向异性平面以及波的传播时间,但会改变速度分量的偏振振幅。慢速 qP 波的衰减随粘度值的增加而增加。渗透率对波场的影响与粘度的影响相反。最后,比较分析了多层弹性介质和孔弹性介质的地震波形差异。结果表明,多孔弹性介质的地震波场和波形更为复杂,地震波的传播速度更快,但地震波的衰减更强。
Improved numerical solution of anisotropic poroelastic wave equation in microseismicity: Graphic process unit acceleration and moment tensor implementation
The accuracy and computational efficiency of full waveform forward modelling in poroelastic media are crucial for microseismic monitoring. It enables intuitive, precise and efficient simulation of subsurface responses, thereby improving the reliability of moment tensor inversion and seismic source mechanism interpretation. Additionally, it reflects the role of fluid effects in waveform evolution. In this paper, based on the Biot mechanism, we derived the first-order velocity–stress equation of poroelastic media and discretized the model using a rotated staggered grid. The rotated staggered grid can well adapt to anisotropic media with high contrast parameters. We provide the finite difference formula based on graphic process unit–acceleration and moment tensor and also provide the graphic process unit workflow for forward modelling of anisotropic poroelastic media. First, two models with different grid sizes were run based on single graphic process unit, 1-thread Central Processing Unit (CPU) and 16-thread CPU. The results show that the speedup factors are approximately 14.3 and 3.7, respectively, compared with the running time of 1-thread CPU and 16-thread CPU. Then, we compare and evaluate the response of three basic source mechanisms (isotropic expansion, double couple and compensated linear vector dipole) in the model. The comparison of analytical and numerical results verifies the effectiveness of the method. Furthermore, wavefield snapshots of two typical anisotropic media (vertical transversely isotropic and horizontal transversely isotropic) are analysed to correspond to different moment tensor sources. The results showed that the source mechanism does not change the isotropic and anisotropic plane and the wave travel time, but it does change the polarization amplitude of the velocity component. The attenuation of slow qP-wave increases along with the increase of the value of viscosity. The effect of permeability on wavefield appears with the opposite effect of viscosity. Finally, the seismic waveform differences between multi-layer elastic media and poroelastic media are compared and analysed. The results showed that the seismic wavefield and waveform of poroelastic media are more complex, the propagation speed of seismic waves is faster, but the attenuation of seismic waves is stronger.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.