{"title":"用高阶非连续有限元方法对壁模型 LES 进行稳健边界处理","authors":"Yuma Fukushima, Takanori Haga","doi":"10.1002/fld.5281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To robustly and accurately simulate wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers, we propose suitable boundary treatments for wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) coupled with a high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method. First, we show the need to impose an auxiliary boundary condition on auxiliary variables (solution gradients) that are commonly introduced in high-order discontinuous finite element methods (DFEMs). Auxiliary boundary conditions are introduced in WMLES, where the grid resolution is too coarse to resolve the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer. Another boundary treatment to further enhance stability with under-resolved grids, is the use of a modal filter only in the wall-normal direction of wall-adjacent cells to remove the oscillations. A grid convergence study of turbulent channel flow with a high Reynolds number (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <msub>\n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n <mn>5200</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ R{e}_{\\tau}\\approx 5200 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) shows that the present WMLES framework accurately predicts velocity profiles, Reynolds shear stress, and skin friction coefficients at the grid resolutions recommended in the literature. It was confirmed that a small amount of filtering is sufficient to stabilize computation, with negligible influence on prediction accuracy. In addition, non-equilibrium periodic hill flow with a curved wall, including flow separation, reattachment, and acceleration at a high Reynolds number (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <msub>\n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mi>h</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n <mn>37</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>000</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ R{e}_h\\approx 37,000 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>), is reported. Considering stability and the prediction accuracy, we recommend a loose auxiliary wall boundary conditions with a less steep velocity gradient for WMLES using high-order DFEMs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"96 7","pages":"1170-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On robust boundary treatments for wall-modeled LES with high-order discontinuous finite element methods\",\"authors\":\"Yuma Fukushima, Takanori Haga\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fld.5281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>To robustly and accurately simulate wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers, we propose suitable boundary treatments for wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) coupled with a high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method. First, we show the need to impose an auxiliary boundary condition on auxiliary variables (solution gradients) that are commonly introduced in high-order discontinuous finite element methods (DFEMs). Auxiliary boundary conditions are introduced in WMLES, where the grid resolution is too coarse to resolve the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer. Another boundary treatment to further enhance stability with under-resolved grids, is the use of a modal filter only in the wall-normal direction of wall-adjacent cells to remove the oscillations. A grid convergence study of turbulent channel flow with a high Reynolds number (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>τ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>≈</mo>\\n <mn>5200</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ R{e}_{\\\\tau}\\\\approx 5200 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) shows that the present WMLES framework accurately predicts velocity profiles, Reynolds shear stress, and skin friction coefficients at the grid resolutions recommended in the literature. It was confirmed that a small amount of filtering is sufficient to stabilize computation, with negligible influence on prediction accuracy. In addition, non-equilibrium periodic hill flow with a curved wall, including flow separation, reattachment, and acceleration at a high Reynolds number (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>h</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>≈</mo>\\n <mn>37</mn>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mn>000</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ R{e}_h\\\\approx 37,000 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>), is reported. Considering stability and the prediction accuracy, we recommend a loose auxiliary wall boundary conditions with a less steep velocity gradient for WMLES using high-order DFEMs.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"volume\":\"96 7\",\"pages\":\"1170-1193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
On robust boundary treatments for wall-modeled LES with high-order discontinuous finite element methods
To robustly and accurately simulate wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers, we propose suitable boundary treatments for wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) coupled with a high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method. First, we show the need to impose an auxiliary boundary condition on auxiliary variables (solution gradients) that are commonly introduced in high-order discontinuous finite element methods (DFEMs). Auxiliary boundary conditions are introduced in WMLES, where the grid resolution is too coarse to resolve the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer. Another boundary treatment to further enhance stability with under-resolved grids, is the use of a modal filter only in the wall-normal direction of wall-adjacent cells to remove the oscillations. A grid convergence study of turbulent channel flow with a high Reynolds number () shows that the present WMLES framework accurately predicts velocity profiles, Reynolds shear stress, and skin friction coefficients at the grid resolutions recommended in the literature. It was confirmed that a small amount of filtering is sufficient to stabilize computation, with negligible influence on prediction accuracy. In addition, non-equilibrium periodic hill flow with a curved wall, including flow separation, reattachment, and acceleration at a high Reynolds number (), is reported. Considering stability and the prediction accuracy, we recommend a loose auxiliary wall boundary conditions with a less steep velocity gradient for WMLES using high-order DFEMs.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction.
Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review.
The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.