通过与二级医疗机构的对话,将皮肤科患者留在基层医疗机构:服务评估

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
J. Brainard , A. Crawford , B. Wright , M. Lim , P. Everden
{"title":"通过与二级医疗机构的对话,将皮肤科患者留在基层医疗机构:服务评估","authors":"J. Brainard ,&nbsp;A. Crawford ,&nbsp;B. Wright ,&nbsp;M. Lim ,&nbsp;P. Everden","doi":"10.1016/j.annder.2024.103248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are long patient waiting lists for specialist care. A dermatology dialogue service between primary and secondary care (DDPS) was developed in eastern England. Primary care referrers uploaded patient images of skin conditions for review by and dialogue with consultant dermatologists in an attempt to retain patients in primary care rather than refer them to secondary care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Evaluation of service performance against specific targets, including reduction in secondary care waiting list growth over the period April 2021–March 2022 inclusive. Service activity was summarized in terms of speed of resolution, case numbers, and dispositions. Clinician and patient satisfaction were assessed using structured questionnaires. Actual numbers of new referrals were compared to projections based on historical data. Waiting list growth was compared to other specialties and other commissioning areas. Waiting times to initial treatment were monitored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over 3300 patients were enrolled and &gt; 90% of dialogues were resolved within 36 hours. Clinician and patient satisfaction were high. Frequently asked questions and conditions were highlighted by dermatologists to design and deliver an educational event for primary care clinicians that was well received. Waiting list growth for dermatology patients in the commissioning area was smaller than for other major specialties, and generally smaller than growth for dermatology waiting lists commissioned by other NHS commissioners. There was no negative impact on the urgent priority (cancer pathway) waiting list.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DDPS was satisfactory for clinicians and patients and coincided with lower growth in dermatology waiting lists than might otherwise have been expected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7900,"journal":{"name":"Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie","volume":"151 2","pages":"Article 103248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0151963824000048/pdfft?md5=a2e26bab035b177309de519f6fc54fc4&pid=1-s2.0-S0151963824000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retaining dermatology patients in primary care through dialogue with secondary care providers: A service evaluation\",\"authors\":\"J. Brainard ,&nbsp;A. Crawford ,&nbsp;B. Wright ,&nbsp;M. Lim ,&nbsp;P. Everden\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annder.2024.103248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are long patient waiting lists for specialist care. A dermatology dialogue service between primary and secondary care (DDPS) was developed in eastern England. Primary care referrers uploaded patient images of skin conditions for review by and dialogue with consultant dermatologists in an attempt to retain patients in primary care rather than refer them to secondary care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Evaluation of service performance against specific targets, including reduction in secondary care waiting list growth over the period April 2021–March 2022 inclusive. Service activity was summarized in terms of speed of resolution, case numbers, and dispositions. Clinician and patient satisfaction were assessed using structured questionnaires. Actual numbers of new referrals were compared to projections based on historical data. Waiting list growth was compared to other specialties and other commissioning areas. Waiting times to initial treatment were monitored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over 3300 patients were enrolled and &gt; 90% of dialogues were resolved within 36 hours. Clinician and patient satisfaction were high. Frequently asked questions and conditions were highlighted by dermatologists to design and deliver an educational event for primary care clinicians that was well received. Waiting list growth for dermatology patients in the commissioning area was smaller than for other major specialties, and generally smaller than growth for dermatology waiting lists commissioned by other NHS commissioners. There was no negative impact on the urgent priority (cancer pathway) waiting list.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DDPS was satisfactory for clinicians and patients and coincided with lower growth in dermatology waiting lists than might otherwise have been expected.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie\",\"volume\":\"151 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 103248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0151963824000048/pdfft?md5=a2e26bab035b177309de519f6fc54fc4&pid=1-s2.0-S0151963824000048-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0151963824000048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0151963824000048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景病人等待专科治疗的时间很长。英格兰东部开发了一项初级和二级医疗之间的皮肤病对话服务(DDPS)。初级医疗转诊者上传患者皮肤状况的图片,供皮肤科顾问医生查看并进行对话,试图将患者留在初级医疗机构,而不是转诊到二级医疗机构。方法对照特定目标对服务绩效进行评估,包括在 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月(含 2022 年 3 月)期间减少二级医疗机构候诊人数的增长。根据解决速度、病例数量和处理情况对服务活动进行总结。使用结构化问卷对临床医生和患者的满意度进行评估。新转诊的实际数量与基于历史数据的预测进行了比较。将候诊人数增长情况与其他专科和其他委托领域进行比较。对初始治疗的等待时间进行了监测。结果有 3300 多名患者登记,90% 的对话在 36 小时内得到解决。临床医生和患者的满意度都很高。皮肤科医生着重强调了常见问题和病情,为初级保健临床医生设计并举办了一次教育活动,受到了广泛欢迎。委托区域内皮肤科患者候诊名单的增长幅度低于其他主要专科,总体上也低于其他 NHS 委托方皮肤科候诊名单的增长幅度。结论:DDPS 对临床医生和患者来说都是令人满意的,同时皮肤科候诊人数的增长也低于预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retaining dermatology patients in primary care through dialogue with secondary care providers: A service evaluation

Background

There are long patient waiting lists for specialist care. A dermatology dialogue service between primary and secondary care (DDPS) was developed in eastern England. Primary care referrers uploaded patient images of skin conditions for review by and dialogue with consultant dermatologists in an attempt to retain patients in primary care rather than refer them to secondary care.

Methods

Evaluation of service performance against specific targets, including reduction in secondary care waiting list growth over the period April 2021–March 2022 inclusive. Service activity was summarized in terms of speed of resolution, case numbers, and dispositions. Clinician and patient satisfaction were assessed using structured questionnaires. Actual numbers of new referrals were compared to projections based on historical data. Waiting list growth was compared to other specialties and other commissioning areas. Waiting times to initial treatment were monitored.

Results

Over 3300 patients were enrolled and > 90% of dialogues were resolved within 36 hours. Clinician and patient satisfaction were high. Frequently asked questions and conditions were highlighted by dermatologists to design and deliver an educational event for primary care clinicians that was well received. Waiting list growth for dermatology patients in the commissioning area was smaller than for other major specialties, and generally smaller than growth for dermatology waiting lists commissioned by other NHS commissioners. There was no negative impact on the urgent priority (cancer pathway) waiting list.

Conclusion

The DDPS was satisfactory for clinicians and patients and coincided with lower growth in dermatology waiting lists than might otherwise have been expected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Les Annales de dermatologie sont le rendez-vous mensuel incontournable de toute la dermatologie francophone, grâce à leur comité de rédaction qui assure une sélection rigoureuse des articles selon les normes de l''édition scientifique internationale. Une revue didactique, véritable aide à la pratique médicale quotidienne Pour compléter et enrichir la partie scientifique, la rubrique Formation médicale continue propose aux lecteurs des textes didactiques et interactifs (Cas pour diagnostic, Notes de pharmacovigilance, la Question du praticien, Dermatologie chirurgicale, la Sélection bibliographique du mois...) qui les font bénéficier d''une formation post-universitaire diversifiée et de qualité. La revue consacre également un espace pour la publication de questions des lecteurs auxquelles des experts apportent une réponse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信