{"title":"关于新兴市场农业企业差距的系统回顾和文献计量分析","authors":"Richard Kwasi Bannor, Kingsley Kofi Arthur","doi":"10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the numerous opportunities offered by globalisation in most agribusiness sectors of African and Asian economies, the sector is still struggling to capitalise on these opportunities and catch up with the trends in developed and emerging markets. Consequently, the current study systematically examined the gaps in the agribusiness industry in Africa and Asia and their significant effects on its growth in the emerging global market. Using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, we employed the PRISMA technique in identifying 122 relevant articles from Google Scholar and Scopus databases. The data was analysed using Bibliometric tools such as VOS viewer, R-package <em>Bibliometrix</em> and MS Excel. The results reveal that publications on the evolution of the agribusiness industry and its gaps have increased over the past 15 years, with the majority of the journals expanding their scope to prioritize the economic development of the agriculture sector in both Africa and Asia. Scholars from developing and developed countries observed a high level of intellectual collaboration. Likewise, the investment in agribusiness research projects was also at the middle peak, with less funding from developing countries' governments. Journals on agribusiness are limited, particularly downstream agribusinesses, with only one journal focussing specifically on agribusiness studies in developing countries. Five major gaps characterised the agribusiness sector, including business management and entrepreneurship skills and training gaps, inadequate knowledge and skills of the youth, inadequate skills and knowledge among females in agribusiness, and technology and innovation gaps. Barriers and challenges such as poor governance and institutional reforms, social and cultural norms, poor market systems, and inadequate flow of information within the agribusiness industry were also identified as gaps. The findings suggest that governments of developing economies should commit funds to agribusiness projects and research projects tailored to solve developing countries' issues to spark the necessary gains from the agribusiness sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34321,"journal":{"name":"Research in Globalization","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X24000236/pdfft?md5=d65c16a4a02f90f593ef493f1ccf4863&pid=1-s2.0-S2590051X24000236-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and bibliometric analysis on agribusiness gaps in emerging markets\",\"authors\":\"Richard Kwasi Bannor, Kingsley Kofi Arthur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the numerous opportunities offered by globalisation in most agribusiness sectors of African and Asian economies, the sector is still struggling to capitalise on these opportunities and catch up with the trends in developed and emerging markets. Consequently, the current study systematically examined the gaps in the agribusiness industry in Africa and Asia and their significant effects on its growth in the emerging global market. Using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, we employed the PRISMA technique in identifying 122 relevant articles from Google Scholar and Scopus databases. The data was analysed using Bibliometric tools such as VOS viewer, R-package <em>Bibliometrix</em> and MS Excel. The results reveal that publications on the evolution of the agribusiness industry and its gaps have increased over the past 15 years, with the majority of the journals expanding their scope to prioritize the economic development of the agriculture sector in both Africa and Asia. Scholars from developing and developed countries observed a high level of intellectual collaboration. Likewise, the investment in agribusiness research projects was also at the middle peak, with less funding from developing countries' governments. Journals on agribusiness are limited, particularly downstream agribusinesses, with only one journal focussing specifically on agribusiness studies in developing countries. Five major gaps characterised the agribusiness sector, including business management and entrepreneurship skills and training gaps, inadequate knowledge and skills of the youth, inadequate skills and knowledge among females in agribusiness, and technology and innovation gaps. Barriers and challenges such as poor governance and institutional reforms, social and cultural norms, poor market systems, and inadequate flow of information within the agribusiness industry were also identified as gaps. The findings suggest that governments of developing economies should commit funds to agribusiness projects and research projects tailored to solve developing countries' issues to spark the necessary gains from the agribusiness sector.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Globalization\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X24000236/pdfft?md5=d65c16a4a02f90f593ef493f1ccf4863&pid=1-s2.0-S2590051X24000236-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Globalization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X24000236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Globalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X24000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管全球化为非洲和亚洲经济体的大多数农业综合企业部门提供了众多机遇,但该部门仍在努力利用这些机遇,追赶发达市场和新兴市场的发展趋势。因此,本研究系统地考察了非洲和亚洲农业综合企业行业存在的差距,以及这些差距对其在新兴全球市场增长的重大影响。我们采用定性和定量两种方法,利用 PRISMA 技术从 Google Scholar 和 Scopus 数据库中识别出 122 篇相关文章。我们使用 VOS 浏览器、R-package Bibliometrix 和 MS Excel 等文献计量学工具对数据进行了分析。结果显示,在过去 15 年中,有关农业综合企业行业演变及其差距的出版物有所增加,大多数期刊都扩大了其范围,将非洲和亚洲农业部门的经济发展列为优先事项。来自发展中国家和发达国家的学者观察到了高水平的智力合作。同样,对农业综合企业研究项目的投资也处于中期高峰,发展中国家政府提供的资金较少。有关农业综合企业,尤其是下游农业综合企业的期刊有限,只有一份期刊专门关注发展中国家的农业综合企业研究。农业企业部门存在五大差距,包括企业管理和创业技能及培训差距、青年知识和技能不足、农业企业女性技能和知识不足以及技术和创新差距。治理不善和体制改革、社会和文化规范、市场体系不完善以及农业综合企业行业内信息流通不足等障碍和挑战也被认为是差距。研究结果表明,发展中经济体的政府应向农业综合企业项目和研究项目投入资金,以解决发展中国家的问题,从而从农业综合企业部门获得必要的收益。
A systematic review and bibliometric analysis on agribusiness gaps in emerging markets
Despite the numerous opportunities offered by globalisation in most agribusiness sectors of African and Asian economies, the sector is still struggling to capitalise on these opportunities and catch up with the trends in developed and emerging markets. Consequently, the current study systematically examined the gaps in the agribusiness industry in Africa and Asia and their significant effects on its growth in the emerging global market. Using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, we employed the PRISMA technique in identifying 122 relevant articles from Google Scholar and Scopus databases. The data was analysed using Bibliometric tools such as VOS viewer, R-package Bibliometrix and MS Excel. The results reveal that publications on the evolution of the agribusiness industry and its gaps have increased over the past 15 years, with the majority of the journals expanding their scope to prioritize the economic development of the agriculture sector in both Africa and Asia. Scholars from developing and developed countries observed a high level of intellectual collaboration. Likewise, the investment in agribusiness research projects was also at the middle peak, with less funding from developing countries' governments. Journals on agribusiness are limited, particularly downstream agribusinesses, with only one journal focussing specifically on agribusiness studies in developing countries. Five major gaps characterised the agribusiness sector, including business management and entrepreneurship skills and training gaps, inadequate knowledge and skills of the youth, inadequate skills and knowledge among females in agribusiness, and technology and innovation gaps. Barriers and challenges such as poor governance and institutional reforms, social and cultural norms, poor market systems, and inadequate flow of information within the agribusiness industry were also identified as gaps. The findings suggest that governments of developing economies should commit funds to agribusiness projects and research projects tailored to solve developing countries' issues to spark the necessary gains from the agribusiness sector.