论据的强制性

IF 2.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Language and Linguistics Compass Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12511

Katie Van Luven, Ida Toivonen

{"title":"论据的强制性","authors":"Katie Van Luven, Ida Toivonen","doi":"10.1111/lnc3.12511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A common diagnostic for distinguishing between arguments and adjuncts is obligatoriness/optionality: as a rule of thumb, arguments are obligatory and adjuncts are optional. However, there are many examples of optional arguments, which have led researchers to question the usefulness of this diagnostic and sometimes even the very distinction between arguments and adjuncts. This paper aims to show that arguments are not simply optional; they are omissible only under identifiable grammatical and pragmatic conditions. By contrast, there are no conditions on when adjuncts can be omitted. There are instead pragmatic conditions that dictate the inclusion of adjuncts.","PeriodicalId":47472,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics Compass","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lnc3.12511","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The obligatoriness of arguments\",\"authors\":\"Katie Van Luven, Ida Toivonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lnc3.12511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A common diagnostic for distinguishing between arguments and adjuncts is obligatoriness/optionality: as a rule of thumb, arguments are obligatory and adjuncts are optional. However, there are many examples of optional arguments, which have led researchers to question the usefulness of this diagnostic and sometimes even the very distinction between arguments and adjuncts. This paper aims to show that arguments are not simply optional; they are omissible only under identifiable grammatical and pragmatic conditions. By contrast, there are no conditions on when adjuncts can be omitted. There are instead pragmatic conditions that dictate the inclusion of adjuncts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Linguistics Compass\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lnc3.12511\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Linguistics Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

区分论据和附属词的常用诊断方法是强制性/可选择性：根据经验法则，论据是强制性的，附属词是可选择性的。然而，可选论据的例子比比皆是，这让研究人员对这一诊断方法的实用性产生了质疑，有时甚至对论据和附属词之间的区别本身也产生了质疑。本文旨在说明，arguments 不仅仅是可选的，它们只有在可识别的语法和语用条件下才是可省略的。相比之下，什么时候可以省略附属词则没有条件限制。相反，有一些语用条件决定了附属词的包含。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The obligatoriness of arguments

A common diagnostic for distinguishing between arguments and adjuncts is obligatoriness/optionality: as a rule of thumb, arguments are obligatory and adjuncts are optional. However, there are many examples of optional arguments, which have led researchers to question the usefulness of this diagnostic and sometimes even the very distinction between arguments and adjuncts. This paper aims to show that arguments are not simply optional; they are omissible only under identifiable grammatical and pragmatic conditions. By contrast, there are no conditions on when adjuncts can be omitted. There are instead pragmatic conditions that dictate the inclusion of adjuncts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language and Linguistics Compass LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Unique in its range, Language and Linguistics Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Language and Linguistics Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Language and Linguistics Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.