肝细胞癌中 miR-1290-EHHADH 轴对细胞增殖的积极调控。

IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jinkwon Lee, Gyeonghwa Kim, Tae-Su Han, Eunsun Jung, Taesang Son, Kwangho Kim, Kiyoon Kwon, Yuna Roh, Tae Young Ryu, In Hwan Tae, Yunsang Kang, Byungheon Lee, Yu Rim Lee, Soo Young Park, Won Young Tak, Dae-Soo Kim, Mi-Young Son, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho
{"title":"肝细胞癌中 miR-1290-EHHADH 轴对细胞增殖的积极调控。","authors":"Jinkwon Lee,&nbsp;Gyeonghwa Kim,&nbsp;Tae-Su Han,&nbsp;Eunsun Jung,&nbsp;Taesang Son,&nbsp;Kwangho Kim,&nbsp;Kiyoon Kwon,&nbsp;Yuna Roh,&nbsp;Tae Young Ryu,&nbsp;In Hwan Tae,&nbsp;Yunsang Kang,&nbsp;Byungheon Lee,&nbsp;Yu Rim Lee,&nbsp;Soo Young Park,&nbsp;Won Young Tak,&nbsp;Dae-Soo Kim,&nbsp;Mi-Young Son,&nbsp;Keun Hur,&nbsp;Hyun-Soo Cho","doi":"10.1002/cac2.12536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [<span>1</span>]. Recently, HCC incidence and mortality rates have further increased due to changes in the global social environment and dietary habits [<span>2</span>]. HCC is treated by surgical resection or combination chemotherapy, but the overall survival rate of HCC patients has not improved, and the recurrence rate is still high due to strong invasiveness and resistance to chemotherapy [<span>3</span>]. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the pathogenesis of HCC and identify novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of HCC. Recently, microRNA-1290 (miR-1290) has been reported to regulate the progression of many types of malignant cancers, such as colorectal cancer [<span>4</span>], lung cancer [<span>5</span>], and HCC [<span>6</span>]. However, research on the therapeutic targets of miR-1290 is still needed. Thus, in this study, we will use HCC patient samples to assess the potential of miR-1290 as both a diagnostic marker and a therapeutic target, and we will demonstrate its oncogenic properties through functional and mechanistic studies. The methods and materials were described in Supplementary Materials andMethods.</p><p>To discover HCC development-specific microRNAs (miRNAs), we performed NanoString-based miRNA expression profiling in 5 steatohepatitis cirrhosis (SHC) tissues and 5 early-stage HCC tissues. Eleven miRNAs were discovered to be differentially expressed between SHC and HCC tissues (Figure 1A). Among them, miR-1290 was upregulated in HCC compared to SHC and was selected based on its cell proliferation and differentiation function in cancers [<span>7, 8</span>]. In a subsequent validation step, the miR-1290 was found to be significantly elevated in HCC tissues compared to either SHC (<i>P</i> = 0.043) or normal healthy liver tissues (NT) (<i>P</i> = 0.019) (Figure 1B). In addition, miR-1290 expression was significantly upregulated as the TNM stage increased in an independent cohort of 111 HCC patients (Figure 1C; ANOVA test <i>P</i> = 0.002). To demonstrate the clinical relevance of miR-1290 expression in patients with HCC, we determined the association between miR-1290 expression and various clinicopathological variables in a cohort of 111 HCC patients (Supplementary Table S1). The expression of miR-1290 was associated with factors reflecting disease progression, such as T stage (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), M stage (<i>P</i> = 0.011), TNM stage (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and BCLC stage (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in high miR-1290-expressing HCC patients (log-rank <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) (Figure 1D). Next, the Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Supplementary Table S2) revealed that T stage (HR 4.60; 95% CI 2.76 to 7.66; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), N stage (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.52 to 6.78; <i>P</i> = 0.002), M stage (HR 5.66; 95% CI 2.73 to 11.72; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), BCLC stage (HR 5.93; 95% CI 3.64 to 9.65; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), AFP expression (HR 2.80; 95% CI 1.73 to 4.53; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), and high expression of miR-1290 (HR 3.16; 95% CI 1.95 to 5.14; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) were associated with a poor prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, T stage (HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.12 to 4.57; <i>P</i> = 0.024), BCLC stage (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.21 to 5.55; <i>P</i> = 0.014), and high expression of miR-1290 (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.67; <i>P</i> = 0.016) were significantly associated with poor survival, while AFP expression was not associated with prognosis. Since miR-1290 expression was associated with M stage, we also examined the association of miR-1290 expression with HCC metastasis. Univariate logistic regression analysis (Supplementary Table S3) revealed that T stage (OR 8.84; 95% CI 1.08 to 72.13; <i>P</i> = 0.042) and high expression of miR-1290 (OR 5.09; 95% CI 1.32 to 19.58; <i>P</i> = 0.018) were significantly associated with distant metastasis. In the multivariate analysis, only high expression of miR-1290 (OR 12.90; 95% CI 1.17 to 142.08; <i>P</i> = 0.037) was independently able to predict metastasis in HCC patients. Furthermore, we validated the expression of exosomal-miR-1290 in sera from patients with SHC and HCC. The levels of exosomal-miR-1290 showed a significant gradual increase as the disease progressed (ANOVA test, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) (Figure 1E). Taken together, these data provide strong evidence that miR-1290 could be a useful biomarker for predicting HCC progression as well as distant metastasis.</p><p>Next, to assess the function of miR-1290 in HCC cell growth, we used the control-mimic (NC) and miR-1290 mimic. After treatment with miR-1290 mimic and NC, we performed CCK-8 assays and observed an increase in cell growth in Hep3B and Huh7 cell lines (Figure 1F). In gene ontology (GO) analysis with RNA-seq results, Figure 1G showed that morphogenesis-, development- and differentiation-related GO terms were enriched by miR-1290 mimic treatment. To identify the direct target of miR-1290, we focused on the downregulated genes after miR-1290 mimic treatment compared to mimic-NC treatment, and we selected the 247 downregulated genes (cut off &gt;2-fold) in RNA-seq results (Figure 1H). By comparing the TargetScan results of miR-1290, we finally selected the enoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (EHHADH) [<span>9</span>] as a direct target of miR-1290. In a luciferase assay using wild-type (wt) and mutant (mut) miR-1290 binding sites in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of EHHADH, we observed that mutation of the EHHADH 3’ UTR did not change the luciferase activity compared to wt (Figure 1I). In prognosis analysis using the RNA-seq result from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) portal, low expression of EHHADH in HCC indicated a poor prognosis (Figure 1J). Also, EHHADH downregulation by siEHHADH showed induction of cell growth in HCC cell lines (Figure 1K). Thus, our results clearly suggest that EHHADH could be a direct target for miR-1290 in HCC.</p><p>GO analysis showed enrichment in the term positive regulation of JUN kinase activity after treatment with the miR-1290 mimic (Supplementary Figure S1A). Additionally, a phosphor-array after treatment with miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH clearly showed that the serine 63 phosphorylation of c-JUN was increased compared to that in the mimic-NC or siCont (siControl RNA) group (Supplementary Figure S1B). Thus, we suggest that the induction of cell growth by miR-1290 is related to the activation of c-JUN via downregulation of EHHADH. To confirm the induction of phosphorylated c-JUN, we found the induction of serine 63 phosphorylation by miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH compared to mimic-NC or siCont, respectively (Figure 1L). In addition, to assess how the miR-1290-EHHADH axis activated c-JUN, we identified a down-target using RNA-seq results after treatment with miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH, and finally, we selected high-mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1) [<span>10</span>] and observed HMGA1 upregulation in qRT-PCR results (Figure 1M). Furthermore, correlation analysis using HCC TCGA results (<i>n</i> = 374) showed a negative correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = -0.56) between EHHADH and HMGA1 expression (Figure 1N). To verify the relationship between EHHADH and HMGA1 in cell growth, we performed recovery analysis after cotreatment with siEHHADH and siHMGA1 and found that a single treatment with siEHHADH induced an increase in c-JUN phosphorylation, while cotreatment group decreased c-JUN phosphorylation (Supplementary Figure S2A andB). In the 3D spheroid model and in vivo xenograft mouse model, we observed an increase in the size of the 3D spheroids and tumors following treatment with the miR-1290 mimic (Figure 1O and 1P, Supplementary Figure S3). Furthermore, the phosphorylation of c-JUN was significantly promoted by miR-1290 mimic treatment in 3D spheroid models (Figure 1Q). Thus, we verified that c-JUN is activated by the miR-1290-EHHADH-HMGA1 axis using a 3D culture model.</p><p>This study demonstrates the potential role of miR-1290 as a biomarker for predicting HCC progression and distant metastasis. We discovered HCC-specific upregulation of miR-1290 by comparing cirrhosis and HCC tissue samples. Through a validation step using several large and independent HCC patient cohorts, we determined that miR-1290 was upregulated in HCC compared with normal liver, and its level increased in a TNM stage-dependent manner along with HCC progression. In addition, one of the unique strengths of our study is that we successfully elucidated the potential role of miR-1290 expression as a novel biomarker for HCC. Patients with high miR-1290 expression had a poor survival rate in the 5-year follow-up analysis. Notably, high miR-1290 expression in HCC was a significant indicator of HCC prognosis and metastasis and performed better than AFP.</p><p>In conclusion, using HCC and normal clinical samples, we identified overexpression of miR-1290 and suggested EHHADH as a direct target of miR-1290 via a luciferase assay. Additionally, the negative regulation of EHHADH by miR-1290 induced c-JUN activation via HMGA1 upregulation. Thus, we suggest that the miR-1290-EHHADH-c-JUN activation axis plays an important role in HCC cell proliferation and that miR-1290 is a novel marker of prognosis and metastasis risk for HCC (Supplementary Figure S4).</p><p><i>Conception and design</i>: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho. <i>Development of methodology</i>: Jinkwon Lee, Tae-Su Han, Eunsun Jung, Kwangho Kim, Tae Young Ryu, In Hwan Tae, Yunsang Kang, Taesang Son, Kiyoon Kwon, Yuna Roh. <i>Analysis and interpretation of data and Clinical data</i>: Gyeonghwa Kim, Byungheon Lee, Yu Rim Lee, Soo Young Park, Won Young Tak. <i>Writing and review of manuscript</i>: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho. <i>Study supervision</i>: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho.</p><p>The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.</p><p>This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2018M3A9H3023077/ 2021M3A9H3016046, 2020R1C1C100743, 2019R1A2C1083892, 2021R1A5A2021614, RS-2023-00225239), the Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine (KFRM) grant funded by the Korea government(the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Health &amp; Welfare, 21A0404L1) and by the KRIBB Research Initiative Program. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.</p><p>The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our institution (Kyungpook National University Hospital) approved the study (#KNUH-2014-04-056-001), and all patients provided written informed consent prior to sample collection. All animal experiments were approved by the Committee on Animal Experimentation of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB-AEC-23188).</p><p>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive regulation of cell proliferation by the miR-1290-EHHADH axis in hepatocellular carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Jinkwon Lee,&nbsp;Gyeonghwa Kim,&nbsp;Tae-Su Han,&nbsp;Eunsun Jung,&nbsp;Taesang Son,&nbsp;Kwangho Kim,&nbsp;Kiyoon Kwon,&nbsp;Yuna Roh,&nbsp;Tae Young Ryu,&nbsp;In Hwan Tae,&nbsp;Yunsang Kang,&nbsp;Byungheon Lee,&nbsp;Yu Rim Lee,&nbsp;Soo Young Park,&nbsp;Won Young Tak,&nbsp;Dae-Soo Kim,&nbsp;Mi-Young Son,&nbsp;Keun Hur,&nbsp;Hyun-Soo Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cac2.12536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [<span>1</span>]. Recently, HCC incidence and mortality rates have further increased due to changes in the global social environment and dietary habits [<span>2</span>]. HCC is treated by surgical resection or combination chemotherapy, but the overall survival rate of HCC patients has not improved, and the recurrence rate is still high due to strong invasiveness and resistance to chemotherapy [<span>3</span>]. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the pathogenesis of HCC and identify novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of HCC. Recently, microRNA-1290 (miR-1290) has been reported to regulate the progression of many types of malignant cancers, such as colorectal cancer [<span>4</span>], lung cancer [<span>5</span>], and HCC [<span>6</span>]. However, research on the therapeutic targets of miR-1290 is still needed. Thus, in this study, we will use HCC patient samples to assess the potential of miR-1290 as both a diagnostic marker and a therapeutic target, and we will demonstrate its oncogenic properties through functional and mechanistic studies. The methods and materials were described in Supplementary Materials andMethods.</p><p>To discover HCC development-specific microRNAs (miRNAs), we performed NanoString-based miRNA expression profiling in 5 steatohepatitis cirrhosis (SHC) tissues and 5 early-stage HCC tissues. Eleven miRNAs were discovered to be differentially expressed between SHC and HCC tissues (Figure 1A). Among them, miR-1290 was upregulated in HCC compared to SHC and was selected based on its cell proliferation and differentiation function in cancers [<span>7, 8</span>]. In a subsequent validation step, the miR-1290 was found to be significantly elevated in HCC tissues compared to either SHC (<i>P</i> = 0.043) or normal healthy liver tissues (NT) (<i>P</i> = 0.019) (Figure 1B). In addition, miR-1290 expression was significantly upregulated as the TNM stage increased in an independent cohort of 111 HCC patients (Figure 1C; ANOVA test <i>P</i> = 0.002). To demonstrate the clinical relevance of miR-1290 expression in patients with HCC, we determined the association between miR-1290 expression and various clinicopathological variables in a cohort of 111 HCC patients (Supplementary Table S1). The expression of miR-1290 was associated with factors reflecting disease progression, such as T stage (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), M stage (<i>P</i> = 0.011), TNM stage (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and BCLC stage (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in high miR-1290-expressing HCC patients (log-rank <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) (Figure 1D). Next, the Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Supplementary Table S2) revealed that T stage (HR 4.60; 95% CI 2.76 to 7.66; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), N stage (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.52 to 6.78; <i>P</i> = 0.002), M stage (HR 5.66; 95% CI 2.73 to 11.72; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), BCLC stage (HR 5.93; 95% CI 3.64 to 9.65; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), AFP expression (HR 2.80; 95% CI 1.73 to 4.53; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), and high expression of miR-1290 (HR 3.16; 95% CI 1.95 to 5.14; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) were associated with a poor prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, T stage (HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.12 to 4.57; <i>P</i> = 0.024), BCLC stage (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.21 to 5.55; <i>P</i> = 0.014), and high expression of miR-1290 (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.67; <i>P</i> = 0.016) were significantly associated with poor survival, while AFP expression was not associated with prognosis. Since miR-1290 expression was associated with M stage, we also examined the association of miR-1290 expression with HCC metastasis. Univariate logistic regression analysis (Supplementary Table S3) revealed that T stage (OR 8.84; 95% CI 1.08 to 72.13; <i>P</i> = 0.042) and high expression of miR-1290 (OR 5.09; 95% CI 1.32 to 19.58; <i>P</i> = 0.018) were significantly associated with distant metastasis. In the multivariate analysis, only high expression of miR-1290 (OR 12.90; 95% CI 1.17 to 142.08; <i>P</i> = 0.037) was independently able to predict metastasis in HCC patients. Furthermore, we validated the expression of exosomal-miR-1290 in sera from patients with SHC and HCC. The levels of exosomal-miR-1290 showed a significant gradual increase as the disease progressed (ANOVA test, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) (Figure 1E). Taken together, these data provide strong evidence that miR-1290 could be a useful biomarker for predicting HCC progression as well as distant metastasis.</p><p>Next, to assess the function of miR-1290 in HCC cell growth, we used the control-mimic (NC) and miR-1290 mimic. After treatment with miR-1290 mimic and NC, we performed CCK-8 assays and observed an increase in cell growth in Hep3B and Huh7 cell lines (Figure 1F). In gene ontology (GO) analysis with RNA-seq results, Figure 1G showed that morphogenesis-, development- and differentiation-related GO terms were enriched by miR-1290 mimic treatment. To identify the direct target of miR-1290, we focused on the downregulated genes after miR-1290 mimic treatment compared to mimic-NC treatment, and we selected the 247 downregulated genes (cut off &gt;2-fold) in RNA-seq results (Figure 1H). By comparing the TargetScan results of miR-1290, we finally selected the enoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (EHHADH) [<span>9</span>] as a direct target of miR-1290. In a luciferase assay using wild-type (wt) and mutant (mut) miR-1290 binding sites in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of EHHADH, we observed that mutation of the EHHADH 3’ UTR did not change the luciferase activity compared to wt (Figure 1I). In prognosis analysis using the RNA-seq result from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) portal, low expression of EHHADH in HCC indicated a poor prognosis (Figure 1J). Also, EHHADH downregulation by siEHHADH showed induction of cell growth in HCC cell lines (Figure 1K). Thus, our results clearly suggest that EHHADH could be a direct target for miR-1290 in HCC.</p><p>GO analysis showed enrichment in the term positive regulation of JUN kinase activity after treatment with the miR-1290 mimic (Supplementary Figure S1A). Additionally, a phosphor-array after treatment with miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH clearly showed that the serine 63 phosphorylation of c-JUN was increased compared to that in the mimic-NC or siCont (siControl RNA) group (Supplementary Figure S1B). Thus, we suggest that the induction of cell growth by miR-1290 is related to the activation of c-JUN via downregulation of EHHADH. To confirm the induction of phosphorylated c-JUN, we found the induction of serine 63 phosphorylation by miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH compared to mimic-NC or siCont, respectively (Figure 1L). In addition, to assess how the miR-1290-EHHADH axis activated c-JUN, we identified a down-target using RNA-seq results after treatment with miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH, and finally, we selected high-mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1) [<span>10</span>] and observed HMGA1 upregulation in qRT-PCR results (Figure 1M). Furthermore, correlation analysis using HCC TCGA results (<i>n</i> = 374) showed a negative correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = -0.56) between EHHADH and HMGA1 expression (Figure 1N). To verify the relationship between EHHADH and HMGA1 in cell growth, we performed recovery analysis after cotreatment with siEHHADH and siHMGA1 and found that a single treatment with siEHHADH induced an increase in c-JUN phosphorylation, while cotreatment group decreased c-JUN phosphorylation (Supplementary Figure S2A andB). In the 3D spheroid model and in vivo xenograft mouse model, we observed an increase in the size of the 3D spheroids and tumors following treatment with the miR-1290 mimic (Figure 1O and 1P, Supplementary Figure S3). Furthermore, the phosphorylation of c-JUN was significantly promoted by miR-1290 mimic treatment in 3D spheroid models (Figure 1Q). Thus, we verified that c-JUN is activated by the miR-1290-EHHADH-HMGA1 axis using a 3D culture model.</p><p>This study demonstrates the potential role of miR-1290 as a biomarker for predicting HCC progression and distant metastasis. We discovered HCC-specific upregulation of miR-1290 by comparing cirrhosis and HCC tissue samples. Through a validation step using several large and independent HCC patient cohorts, we determined that miR-1290 was upregulated in HCC compared with normal liver, and its level increased in a TNM stage-dependent manner along with HCC progression. In addition, one of the unique strengths of our study is that we successfully elucidated the potential role of miR-1290 expression as a novel biomarker for HCC. Patients with high miR-1290 expression had a poor survival rate in the 5-year follow-up analysis. Notably, high miR-1290 expression in HCC was a significant indicator of HCC prognosis and metastasis and performed better than AFP.</p><p>In conclusion, using HCC and normal clinical samples, we identified overexpression of miR-1290 and suggested EHHADH as a direct target of miR-1290 via a luciferase assay. Additionally, the negative regulation of EHHADH by miR-1290 induced c-JUN activation via HMGA1 upregulation. Thus, we suggest that the miR-1290-EHHADH-c-JUN activation axis plays an important role in HCC cell proliferation and that miR-1290 is a novel marker of prognosis and metastasis risk for HCC (Supplementary Figure S4).</p><p><i>Conception and design</i>: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho. <i>Development of methodology</i>: Jinkwon Lee, Tae-Su Han, Eunsun Jung, Kwangho Kim, Tae Young Ryu, In Hwan Tae, Yunsang Kang, Taesang Son, Kiyoon Kwon, Yuna Roh. <i>Analysis and interpretation of data and Clinical data</i>: Gyeonghwa Kim, Byungheon Lee, Yu Rim Lee, Soo Young Park, Won Young Tak. <i>Writing and review of manuscript</i>: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho. <i>Study supervision</i>: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho.</p><p>The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.</p><p>This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2018M3A9H3023077/ 2021M3A9H3016046, 2020R1C1C100743, 2019R1A2C1083892, 2021R1A5A2021614, RS-2023-00225239), the Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine (KFRM) grant funded by the Korea government(the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Health &amp; Welfare, 21A0404L1) and by the KRIBB Research Initiative Program. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.</p><p>The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our institution (Kyungpook National University Hospital) approved the study (#KNUH-2014-04-056-001), and all patients provided written informed consent prior to sample collection. All animal experiments were approved by the Committee on Animal Experimentation of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB-AEC-23188).</p><p>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194445/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cac2.12536\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cac2.12536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确定miR-1290的直接靶标,我们关注了miR-1290模拟处理后与模拟-NC处理相比下调的基因,并选择了RNA-seq结果中247个下调基因(截断&gt;2-fold)(图1H)。通过比较 miR-1290 的 TargetScan 结果,我们最终选择了烯酰-CoA、氢化酶/3-羟基乙酰 CoA 脱氢酶(EHHADH)[9] 作为 miR-1290 的直接靶标。在使用 EHHADH 3' 非翻译区(UTR)的野生型(wt)和突变型(mut)miR-1290 结合位点进行的荧光素酶检测中,我们观察到与 wt 相比,EHHADH 3' UTR 的突变不会改变荧光素酶的活性(图 1I)。利用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)门户网站的RNA-seq结果进行预后分析发现,EHHADH在HCC中的低表达表明预后较差(图1J)。此外,通过 siEHHADH 下调 EHHADH 会诱导 HCC 细胞系的细胞生长(图 1K)。因此,我们的研究结果清楚地表明,EHHADH可能是miR-1290在HCC中的直接靶点。GO分析表明,经miR-1290模拟物处理后,JUN激酶活性正向调节这一术语富集(补充图S1A)。此外,用 miR-1290 mimic 或 siEHHADH 处理后的磷酸化阵列清楚地显示,与 mimic-NC 或 siCont(siControl RNA)组相比,c-JUN 的丝氨酸 63 磷酸化增加了(补充图 S1B)。因此,我们认为 miR-1290 诱导细胞生长与通过下调 EHHADH 激活 c-JUN 有关。为了证实磷酸化 c-JUN 的诱导,我们发现 miR-1290 mimic 或 siEHHADH 与 mimic-NC 或 siCont 相比,分别诱导了丝氨酸 63 磷酸化(图 1L)。此外,为了评估miR-1290-EHHADH轴如何激活c-JUN,我们利用miR-1290 mimic或siEHHADH处理后的RNA-seq结果确定了一个下调靶标,最后我们选择了高迁移率组AT-钩1(HMGA1)[10],并在qRT-PCR结果中观察到HMGA1上调(图1M)。此外,利用 HCC TCGA 结果(n = 374)进行的相关性分析表明,EHHADH 与 HMGA1 的表达呈负相关(R2 = -0.56)(图 1N)。为了验证 EHHADH 和 HMGA1 在细胞生长中的关系,我们在 siEHHADH 和 siHMGA1 共处理后进行了恢复分析,发现 siEHHADH 单次处理会诱导 c-JUN 磷酸化的增加,而共处理组会降低 c-JUN 磷酸化(补充图 S2A 和 B)。在三维小球模型和体内异种移植小鼠模型中,我们观察到用 miR-1290 模拟物处理后三维小球和肿瘤的体积增大(图 1O 和 1P,补充图 S3)。此外,在三维球状模型中,miR-1290 嵌体处理显著促进了 c-JUN 的磷酸化(图 1Q)。这项研究证明了 miR-1290 作为预测 HCC 进展和远处转移的生物标记物的潜在作用。我们通过比较肝硬化和HCC组织样本,发现了HCC特异性的miR-1290上调。通过使用几个大型独立 HCC 患者队列进行验证,我们确定与正常肝脏相比,miR-1290 在 HCC 中上调,而且其水平随着 HCC 的进展以 TNM 分期依赖性的方式升高。此外,我们研究的独特优势之一是成功阐明了 miR-1290 表达作为新型 HCC 生物标记物的潜在作用。在 5 年的随访分析中,miR-1290 高表达的患者生存率较低。值得注意的是,HCC中miR-1290的高表达是HCC预后和转移的一个重要指标,其表现优于甲胎蛋白。此外,miR-1290 对 EHHADH 的负调控通过 HMGA1 的上调诱导了 c-JUN 的活化。因此,我们认为miR-1290-EHHADH-c-JUN激活轴在HCC细胞增殖中起着重要作用,而且miR-1290是HCC预后和转移风险的新标志物(补充图S4):构思与设计:Mi-Young Son、Dae-Soo Kim、Keun Hur、Hyun-Soo Cho。方法开发:Jinkwon Lee, Tae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho:Jinkwon Lee、Tae-Su Han、Eunsun Jung、Kwangho Kim、Tae Young Ryu、In Hwan Tae、Yunsang Kang、Taesang Son、Kiyoon Kwon、Yuna Roh。数据分析和解释以及临床数据:Gyeonghwa Kim、Byungheon Lee、Yu Rim Lee、Soo Young Park、Won Young Tak。撰写和审阅手稿Mi-Young Son、Dae-Soo Kim、Keun Hur、Hyun-Soo Cho。研究监督:研究监督:Mi-Young Son、Dae-Soo Kim、Keun Hur、Hyun-Soo Cho。作者声明不存在竞争利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Positive regulation of cell proliferation by the miR-1290-EHHADH axis in hepatocellular carcinoma

Positive regulation of cell proliferation by the miR-1290-EHHADH axis in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Recently, HCC incidence and mortality rates have further increased due to changes in the global social environment and dietary habits [2]. HCC is treated by surgical resection or combination chemotherapy, but the overall survival rate of HCC patients has not improved, and the recurrence rate is still high due to strong invasiveness and resistance to chemotherapy [3]. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the pathogenesis of HCC and identify novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of HCC. Recently, microRNA-1290 (miR-1290) has been reported to regulate the progression of many types of malignant cancers, such as colorectal cancer [4], lung cancer [5], and HCC [6]. However, research on the therapeutic targets of miR-1290 is still needed. Thus, in this study, we will use HCC patient samples to assess the potential of miR-1290 as both a diagnostic marker and a therapeutic target, and we will demonstrate its oncogenic properties through functional and mechanistic studies. The methods and materials were described in Supplementary Materials andMethods.

To discover HCC development-specific microRNAs (miRNAs), we performed NanoString-based miRNA expression profiling in 5 steatohepatitis cirrhosis (SHC) tissues and 5 early-stage HCC tissues. Eleven miRNAs were discovered to be differentially expressed between SHC and HCC tissues (Figure 1A). Among them, miR-1290 was upregulated in HCC compared to SHC and was selected based on its cell proliferation and differentiation function in cancers [7, 8]. In a subsequent validation step, the miR-1290 was found to be significantly elevated in HCC tissues compared to either SHC (P = 0.043) or normal healthy liver tissues (NT) (P = 0.019) (Figure 1B). In addition, miR-1290 expression was significantly upregulated as the TNM stage increased in an independent cohort of 111 HCC patients (Figure 1C; ANOVA test P = 0.002). To demonstrate the clinical relevance of miR-1290 expression in patients with HCC, we determined the association between miR-1290 expression and various clinicopathological variables in a cohort of 111 HCC patients (Supplementary Table S1). The expression of miR-1290 was associated with factors reflecting disease progression, such as T stage (P < 0.001), M stage (P = 0.011), TNM stage (P = 0.003), and BCLC stage (P < 0.001). Moreover, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in high miR-1290-expressing HCC patients (log-rank P < 0.001) (Figure 1D). Next, the Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Supplementary Table S2) revealed that T stage (HR 4.60; 95% CI 2.76 to 7.66; P < 0.001), N stage (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.52 to 6.78; P = 0.002), M stage (HR 5.66; 95% CI 2.73 to 11.72; P < 0.001), BCLC stage (HR 5.93; 95% CI 3.64 to 9.65; P < 0.001), AFP expression (HR 2.80; 95% CI 1.73 to 4.53; P < 0.001), and high expression of miR-1290 (HR 3.16; 95% CI 1.95 to 5.14; P < 0.001) were associated with a poor prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, T stage (HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.12 to 4.57; P = 0.024), BCLC stage (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.21 to 5.55; P = 0.014), and high expression of miR-1290 (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.67; P = 0.016) were significantly associated with poor survival, while AFP expression was not associated with prognosis. Since miR-1290 expression was associated with M stage, we also examined the association of miR-1290 expression with HCC metastasis. Univariate logistic regression analysis (Supplementary Table S3) revealed that T stage (OR 8.84; 95% CI 1.08 to 72.13; P = 0.042) and high expression of miR-1290 (OR 5.09; 95% CI 1.32 to 19.58; P = 0.018) were significantly associated with distant metastasis. In the multivariate analysis, only high expression of miR-1290 (OR 12.90; 95% CI 1.17 to 142.08; P = 0.037) was independently able to predict metastasis in HCC patients. Furthermore, we validated the expression of exosomal-miR-1290 in sera from patients with SHC and HCC. The levels of exosomal-miR-1290 showed a significant gradual increase as the disease progressed (ANOVA test, P < 0.001) (Figure 1E). Taken together, these data provide strong evidence that miR-1290 could be a useful biomarker for predicting HCC progression as well as distant metastasis.

Next, to assess the function of miR-1290 in HCC cell growth, we used the control-mimic (NC) and miR-1290 mimic. After treatment with miR-1290 mimic and NC, we performed CCK-8 assays and observed an increase in cell growth in Hep3B and Huh7 cell lines (Figure 1F). In gene ontology (GO) analysis with RNA-seq results, Figure 1G showed that morphogenesis-, development- and differentiation-related GO terms were enriched by miR-1290 mimic treatment. To identify the direct target of miR-1290, we focused on the downregulated genes after miR-1290 mimic treatment compared to mimic-NC treatment, and we selected the 247 downregulated genes (cut off >2-fold) in RNA-seq results (Figure 1H). By comparing the TargetScan results of miR-1290, we finally selected the enoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (EHHADH) [9] as a direct target of miR-1290. In a luciferase assay using wild-type (wt) and mutant (mut) miR-1290 binding sites in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of EHHADH, we observed that mutation of the EHHADH 3’ UTR did not change the luciferase activity compared to wt (Figure 1I). In prognosis analysis using the RNA-seq result from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) portal, low expression of EHHADH in HCC indicated a poor prognosis (Figure 1J). Also, EHHADH downregulation by siEHHADH showed induction of cell growth in HCC cell lines (Figure 1K). Thus, our results clearly suggest that EHHADH could be a direct target for miR-1290 in HCC.

GO analysis showed enrichment in the term positive regulation of JUN kinase activity after treatment with the miR-1290 mimic (Supplementary Figure S1A). Additionally, a phosphor-array after treatment with miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH clearly showed that the serine 63 phosphorylation of c-JUN was increased compared to that in the mimic-NC or siCont (siControl RNA) group (Supplementary Figure S1B). Thus, we suggest that the induction of cell growth by miR-1290 is related to the activation of c-JUN via downregulation of EHHADH. To confirm the induction of phosphorylated c-JUN, we found the induction of serine 63 phosphorylation by miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH compared to mimic-NC or siCont, respectively (Figure 1L). In addition, to assess how the miR-1290-EHHADH axis activated c-JUN, we identified a down-target using RNA-seq results after treatment with miR-1290 mimic or siEHHADH, and finally, we selected high-mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1) [10] and observed HMGA1 upregulation in qRT-PCR results (Figure 1M). Furthermore, correlation analysis using HCC TCGA results (n = 374) showed a negative correlation (R2 = -0.56) between EHHADH and HMGA1 expression (Figure 1N). To verify the relationship between EHHADH and HMGA1 in cell growth, we performed recovery analysis after cotreatment with siEHHADH and siHMGA1 and found that a single treatment with siEHHADH induced an increase in c-JUN phosphorylation, while cotreatment group decreased c-JUN phosphorylation (Supplementary Figure S2A andB). In the 3D spheroid model and in vivo xenograft mouse model, we observed an increase in the size of the 3D spheroids and tumors following treatment with the miR-1290 mimic (Figure 1O and 1P, Supplementary Figure S3). Furthermore, the phosphorylation of c-JUN was significantly promoted by miR-1290 mimic treatment in 3D spheroid models (Figure 1Q). Thus, we verified that c-JUN is activated by the miR-1290-EHHADH-HMGA1 axis using a 3D culture model.

This study demonstrates the potential role of miR-1290 as a biomarker for predicting HCC progression and distant metastasis. We discovered HCC-specific upregulation of miR-1290 by comparing cirrhosis and HCC tissue samples. Through a validation step using several large and independent HCC patient cohorts, we determined that miR-1290 was upregulated in HCC compared with normal liver, and its level increased in a TNM stage-dependent manner along with HCC progression. In addition, one of the unique strengths of our study is that we successfully elucidated the potential role of miR-1290 expression as a novel biomarker for HCC. Patients with high miR-1290 expression had a poor survival rate in the 5-year follow-up analysis. Notably, high miR-1290 expression in HCC was a significant indicator of HCC prognosis and metastasis and performed better than AFP.

In conclusion, using HCC and normal clinical samples, we identified overexpression of miR-1290 and suggested EHHADH as a direct target of miR-1290 via a luciferase assay. Additionally, the negative regulation of EHHADH by miR-1290 induced c-JUN activation via HMGA1 upregulation. Thus, we suggest that the miR-1290-EHHADH-c-JUN activation axis plays an important role in HCC cell proliferation and that miR-1290 is a novel marker of prognosis and metastasis risk for HCC (Supplementary Figure S4).

Conception and design: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho. Development of methodology: Jinkwon Lee, Tae-Su Han, Eunsun Jung, Kwangho Kim, Tae Young Ryu, In Hwan Tae, Yunsang Kang, Taesang Son, Kiyoon Kwon, Yuna Roh. Analysis and interpretation of data and Clinical data: Gyeonghwa Kim, Byungheon Lee, Yu Rim Lee, Soo Young Park, Won Young Tak. Writing and review of manuscript: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho. Study supervision: Mi-Young Son, Dae-Soo Kim, Keun Hur, Hyun-Soo Cho.

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2018M3A9H3023077/ 2021M3A9H3016046, 2020R1C1C100743, 2019R1A2C1083892, 2021R1A5A2021614, RS-2023-00225239), the Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine (KFRM) grant funded by the Korea government(the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, 21A0404L1) and by the KRIBB Research Initiative Program. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our institution (Kyungpook National University Hospital) approved the study (#KNUH-2014-04-056-001), and all patients provided written informed consent prior to sample collection. All animal experiments were approved by the Committee on Animal Experimentation of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB-AEC-23188).

Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Communications
Cancer Communications Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Communications is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses basic, clinical, and translational cancer research. The journal welcomes submissions concerning clinical trials, epidemiology, molecular and cellular biology, and genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信