{"title":"提高用于食源性病原体预防控制验证的替代品的效用","authors":"Ian M Hildebrandt, Bradley P Marks","doi":"10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act, surrogate microorganisms have become increasingly important tools in the modern U.S. food system. Food processors may implement surrogate-based validations of preventive controls, but they often rely on independent research to quantify the surrogate–pathogen relationship. A systematic review of 59 2018–2023 surrogate–pathogen comparison studies revealed common pitfalls, such as inconsistent determination of the appropriate relative resistance of the surrogate and the pathogen to a reduction treatment. While surrogate research is diversifying with novel applications, the utility of recent research is limited, as studies lack robust statistical characterization of the surrogate–pathogen relationship needed for fully informed application in industry validations. Standard surrogate characterization and implementation practices would improve utility and food control validation success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54291,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Food Science","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101153"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799324000316/pdfft?md5=f009a1cf5ce22951e5a78e73e7391a45&pid=1-s2.0-S2214799324000316-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the utility of surrogates intended for foodborne pathogen preventive control validations\",\"authors\":\"Ian M Hildebrandt, Bradley P Marks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Since the implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act, surrogate microorganisms have become increasingly important tools in the modern U.S. food system. Food processors may implement surrogate-based validations of preventive controls, but they often rely on independent research to quantify the surrogate–pathogen relationship. A systematic review of 59 2018–2023 surrogate–pathogen comparison studies revealed common pitfalls, such as inconsistent determination of the appropriate relative resistance of the surrogate and the pathogen to a reduction treatment. While surrogate research is diversifying with novel applications, the utility of recent research is limited, as studies lack robust statistical characterization of the surrogate–pathogen relationship needed for fully informed application in industry validations. Standard surrogate characterization and implementation practices would improve utility and food control validation success.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Food Science\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799324000316/pdfft?md5=f009a1cf5ce22951e5a78e73e7391a45&pid=1-s2.0-S2214799324000316-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799324000316\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799324000316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving the utility of surrogates intended for foodborne pathogen preventive control validations
Since the implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act, surrogate microorganisms have become increasingly important tools in the modern U.S. food system. Food processors may implement surrogate-based validations of preventive controls, but they often rely on independent research to quantify the surrogate–pathogen relationship. A systematic review of 59 2018–2023 surrogate–pathogen comparison studies revealed common pitfalls, such as inconsistent determination of the appropriate relative resistance of the surrogate and the pathogen to a reduction treatment. While surrogate research is diversifying with novel applications, the utility of recent research is limited, as studies lack robust statistical characterization of the surrogate–pathogen relationship needed for fully informed application in industry validations. Standard surrogate characterization and implementation practices would improve utility and food control validation success.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Food Science specifically provides expert views on current advances in food science in a clear and readable format. It also evaluates the most noteworthy papers from original publications, annotated by experts.
Key Features:
Expert Views on Current Advances: Clear and readable insights from experts in the field regarding current advances in food science.
Evaluation of Noteworthy Papers: Annotated evaluations of the most interesting papers from the extensive array of original publications.
Themed Sections: The subject of food science is divided into themed sections, each reviewed once a year.