量化英国学校的过热风险:空间一致性气候风险评估

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Laura C. Dawkins , Kate Brown , Dan J. Bernie , Jason A. Lowe , Theodoros Economou , Duncan Grassie , Yair Schwartz , Daniel Godoy-Shimizu , Ivan Korolija , Dejan Mumovic , David Wingate , Emma Dyer
{"title":"量化英国学校的过热风险:空间一致性气候风险评估","authors":"Laura C. Dawkins ,&nbsp;Kate Brown ,&nbsp;Dan J. Bernie ,&nbsp;Jason A. Lowe ,&nbsp;Theodoros Economou ,&nbsp;Duncan Grassie ,&nbsp;Yair Schwartz ,&nbsp;Daniel Godoy-Shimizu ,&nbsp;Ivan Korolija ,&nbsp;Dejan Mumovic ,&nbsp;David Wingate ,&nbsp;Emma Dyer","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2024.100602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate adaptation decision making can be informed by a quantification of current and future climate risk. This is important for understanding which populations and/or infrastructures are most at risk in order to prioritise adaptation action. When assessing the risk of overheating in buildings, many studies use advanced building models to comprehensively represent the vulnerability of the building to overheating, but often use a limited representation of the meteorological (hazard) information which does not vary realistically in space. An alternative approach for quantifying risk is to use a spatial risk assessment framework which combines information about hazard, exposure and vulnerability to estimate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for risk to be compared across different locations. Here we present a novel application of an open-source CLIMADA-based spatial risk assessment framework to an ensemble of climate projections to assess overheating risk in ∼20,000 schools in England. In doing so, we demonstrate an approach for bringing together the advantages of open-source spatial risk assessment frameworks, data science techniques, and physics-based building models to assess climate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for the prioritisation of adaptation action in this vulnerable young population. Specifically, we assess the expected number of days each school overheats (internal operative temperature exceeds a high threshold) in a school-year based on three global warming levels (recent past, 2 °C and 4 °C warmer than pre-industrial). Our results indicate an increase in this risk in future warmer climates, with the relative frequency of overheating at internal temperatures in excess of 35 °C increasing more than at 26 °C. Indeed, this novel demonstration of the approach indicates that the most at-risk schools could experience up to 15 school days of internal temperature in excess of 35 °C in an average year if the climate warms to 2 °C above pre-industrial. Finally, we demonstrate how the spatial consistency in the output risk could enable the prioritisation of high risk schools for adaptation action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100602"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000196/pdfft?md5=549ab4b4718dd60604382634e6610a7a&pid=1-s2.0-S2212096324000196-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying overheating risk in English schools: A spatially coherent climate risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Laura C. Dawkins ,&nbsp;Kate Brown ,&nbsp;Dan J. Bernie ,&nbsp;Jason A. Lowe ,&nbsp;Theodoros Economou ,&nbsp;Duncan Grassie ,&nbsp;Yair Schwartz ,&nbsp;Daniel Godoy-Shimizu ,&nbsp;Ivan Korolija ,&nbsp;Dejan Mumovic ,&nbsp;David Wingate ,&nbsp;Emma Dyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crm.2024.100602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Climate adaptation decision making can be informed by a quantification of current and future climate risk. This is important for understanding which populations and/or infrastructures are most at risk in order to prioritise adaptation action. When assessing the risk of overheating in buildings, many studies use advanced building models to comprehensively represent the vulnerability of the building to overheating, but often use a limited representation of the meteorological (hazard) information which does not vary realistically in space. An alternative approach for quantifying risk is to use a spatial risk assessment framework which combines information about hazard, exposure and vulnerability to estimate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for risk to be compared across different locations. Here we present a novel application of an open-source CLIMADA-based spatial risk assessment framework to an ensemble of climate projections to assess overheating risk in ∼20,000 schools in England. In doing so, we demonstrate an approach for bringing together the advantages of open-source spatial risk assessment frameworks, data science techniques, and physics-based building models to assess climate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for the prioritisation of adaptation action in this vulnerable young population. Specifically, we assess the expected number of days each school overheats (internal operative temperature exceeds a high threshold) in a school-year based on three global warming levels (recent past, 2 °C and 4 °C warmer than pre-industrial). Our results indicate an increase in this risk in future warmer climates, with the relative frequency of overheating at internal temperatures in excess of 35 °C increasing more than at 26 °C. Indeed, this novel demonstration of the approach indicates that the most at-risk schools could experience up to 15 school days of internal temperature in excess of 35 °C in an average year if the climate warms to 2 °C above pre-industrial. Finally, we demonstrate how the spatial consistency in the output risk could enable the prioritisation of high risk schools for adaptation action.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000196/pdfft?md5=549ab4b4718dd60604382634e6610a7a&pid=1-s2.0-S2212096324000196-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对当前和未来气候风险的量化可为气候适应决策提供信息。这对于了解哪些人群和/或基础设施面临的风险最大,以便优先采取适应行动非常重要。在评估建筑物过热风险时,许多研究使用先进的建筑模型来全面表示建筑物对过热的脆弱性,但通常使用的气象(灾害)信息表示有限,无法真实反映空间变化。量化风险的另一种方法是使用空间风险评估框架,该框架结合了有关危害、暴露和脆弱性的信息,以空间一致的方式估算风险,从而可以对不同地点的风险进行比较。在这里,我们介绍了一种基于 CLIMADA 的开源空间风险评估框架在气候预测组合中的新应用,以评估英格兰 2 万多所学校的过热风险。在此过程中,我们展示了一种方法,可将开源空间风险评估框架、数据科学技术和基于物理学的建筑模型的优势结合起来,以空间一致的方式评估气候风险,从而为这一脆弱的年轻群体确定适应行动的优先次序。具体而言,我们根据三种全球变暖水平(近期、比工业化前升温 2 ℃ 和 4 ℃),评估了每所学校在一个学年中过热(内部工作温度超过高阈值)的预期天数。我们的研究结果表明,在未来气候变暖的情况下,这种风险会增加,内部温度超过 35 °C 时的过热相对频率比 26 °C 时增加得更多。事实上,这种新颖的方法表明,如果气候变暖到比工业化前温度高 2 °C,风险最高的学校在平均一年中可能会有多达 15 个校内温度超过 35 °C的教学日。最后,我们展示了输出风险的空间一致性如何使高风险学校优先采取适应行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying overheating risk in English schools: A spatially coherent climate risk assessment

Climate adaptation decision making can be informed by a quantification of current and future climate risk. This is important for understanding which populations and/or infrastructures are most at risk in order to prioritise adaptation action. When assessing the risk of overheating in buildings, many studies use advanced building models to comprehensively represent the vulnerability of the building to overheating, but often use a limited representation of the meteorological (hazard) information which does not vary realistically in space. An alternative approach for quantifying risk is to use a spatial risk assessment framework which combines information about hazard, exposure and vulnerability to estimate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for risk to be compared across different locations. Here we present a novel application of an open-source CLIMADA-based spatial risk assessment framework to an ensemble of climate projections to assess overheating risk in ∼20,000 schools in England. In doing so, we demonstrate an approach for bringing together the advantages of open-source spatial risk assessment frameworks, data science techniques, and physics-based building models to assess climate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for the prioritisation of adaptation action in this vulnerable young population. Specifically, we assess the expected number of days each school overheats (internal operative temperature exceeds a high threshold) in a school-year based on three global warming levels (recent past, 2 °C and 4 °C warmer than pre-industrial). Our results indicate an increase in this risk in future warmer climates, with the relative frequency of overheating at internal temperatures in excess of 35 °C increasing more than at 26 °C. Indeed, this novel demonstration of the approach indicates that the most at-risk schools could experience up to 15 school days of internal temperature in excess of 35 °C in an average year if the climate warms to 2 °C above pre-industrial. Finally, we demonstrate how the spatial consistency in the output risk could enable the prioritisation of high risk schools for adaptation action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climate Risk Management
Climate Risk Management Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term. The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信