表型和基因分型策略以及使用常规或有机种公猪对有机猪群体遗传增益的影响

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
R.M. Zaalberg , J.B. Clasen , H. Bovbjerg , J. Jensen , T.M. Villumsen , T.T. Chu
{"title":"表型和基因分型策略以及使用常规或有机种公猪对有机猪群体遗传增益的影响","authors":"R.M. Zaalberg ,&nbsp;J.B. Clasen ,&nbsp;H. Bovbjerg ,&nbsp;J. Jensen ,&nbsp;T.M. Villumsen ,&nbsp;T.T. Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Optimizing organic pig breeding schemes depends on how to best allocate resources to phenotyping and genotyping. This study investigates how phenotyping and genotyping strategies affect genetic gain in a small organic pig population. We used stochastically simulated breeding schemes aimed at producing three-way crossbred finisher pigs. The simulated breeding schemes varied in the availability of phenotypes and genotypes for purebreds and crossbreds, the origin of the sire, and the genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance. For each simulated breeding scheme, genetic gain and rate of inbreeding were collected for up to 100 replicates. Phenotyping of crossbred individuals did not improve the genetic gain in the purebreds or the crossbreds. Genotyping purebred sows did improve genetic gain in both purebreds and crossbreds. Genetic gain and rate of inbreeding were maximized when internal sires were used, assuming strong GxE between organic and conventional production systems. Yet, breeding schemes that used internal sires had a larger variance in the genetic gain than those that used external sires. In conclusion, breeding schemes for organic pigs can be optimized by using internal sires and by genotyping the purebred parents. Yet, the rate of inbreeding and population size should be taken into careful consideration when developing an independent breeding program for a small (organic) population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"283 ","pages":"Article 105456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324000635/pdfft?md5=eee8d52a87b7941ad6f7d02f44f11120&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324000635-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of phenotyping and genotyping strategies, and the use of conventional or organic sires on genetic gain in an organic pig population\",\"authors\":\"R.M. Zaalberg ,&nbsp;J.B. Clasen ,&nbsp;H. Bovbjerg ,&nbsp;J. Jensen ,&nbsp;T.M. Villumsen ,&nbsp;T.T. Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Optimizing organic pig breeding schemes depends on how to best allocate resources to phenotyping and genotyping. This study investigates how phenotyping and genotyping strategies affect genetic gain in a small organic pig population. We used stochastically simulated breeding schemes aimed at producing three-way crossbred finisher pigs. The simulated breeding schemes varied in the availability of phenotypes and genotypes for purebreds and crossbreds, the origin of the sire, and the genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance. For each simulated breeding scheme, genetic gain and rate of inbreeding were collected for up to 100 replicates. Phenotyping of crossbred individuals did not improve the genetic gain in the purebreds or the crossbreds. Genotyping purebred sows did improve genetic gain in both purebreds and crossbreds. Genetic gain and rate of inbreeding were maximized when internal sires were used, assuming strong GxE between organic and conventional production systems. Yet, breeding schemes that used internal sires had a larger variance in the genetic gain than those that used external sires. In conclusion, breeding schemes for organic pigs can be optimized by using internal sires and by genotyping the purebred parents. Yet, the rate of inbreeding and population size should be taken into careful consideration when developing an independent breeding program for a small (organic) population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Livestock Science\",\"volume\":\"283 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324000635/pdfft?md5=eee8d52a87b7941ad6f7d02f44f11120&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324000635-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Livestock Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324000635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324000635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有机猪育种计划的优化取决于如何为表型和基因分型分配最佳资源。本研究调查了表型和基因分型策略如何影响小型有机猪群体的遗传增益。我们采用随机模拟育种方案,旨在生产三元杂交育成猪。模拟育种方案在纯种猪和杂交猪的表型和基因型的可用性、母本的来源以及纯种猪和杂交猪的遗传相关性方面各不相同。每个模拟育种方案都收集了多达 100 个重复的遗传增益和近交率。对杂交个体进行表型并不能提高纯种或杂交个体的遗传增益。对纯种母猪进行基因分型确实提高了纯种母猪和杂交母猪的遗传增益。假定有机生产系统和传统生产系统之间存在较强的 GxE,使用内部父本时,遗传增益和近交率都达到了最大值。然而,与使用外部父本的育种方案相比,使用内部父本的育种方案的遗传增益差异更大。总之,有机猪的育种方案可以通过使用内部父本和对纯种亲本进行基因分型来优化。然而,在为小型(有机)种群制定独立的育种计划时,应仔细考虑近亲繁殖率和种群规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of phenotyping and genotyping strategies, and the use of conventional or organic sires on genetic gain in an organic pig population

Optimizing organic pig breeding schemes depends on how to best allocate resources to phenotyping and genotyping. This study investigates how phenotyping and genotyping strategies affect genetic gain in a small organic pig population. We used stochastically simulated breeding schemes aimed at producing three-way crossbred finisher pigs. The simulated breeding schemes varied in the availability of phenotypes and genotypes for purebreds and crossbreds, the origin of the sire, and the genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance. For each simulated breeding scheme, genetic gain and rate of inbreeding were collected for up to 100 replicates. Phenotyping of crossbred individuals did not improve the genetic gain in the purebreds or the crossbreds. Genotyping purebred sows did improve genetic gain in both purebreds and crossbreds. Genetic gain and rate of inbreeding were maximized when internal sires were used, assuming strong GxE between organic and conventional production systems. Yet, breeding schemes that used internal sires had a larger variance in the genetic gain than those that used external sires. In conclusion, breeding schemes for organic pigs can be optimized by using internal sires and by genotyping the purebred parents. Yet, the rate of inbreeding and population size should be taken into careful consideration when developing an independent breeding program for a small (organic) population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信