环境脆弱性是公共优先事项：地方经济精英的观点
IF 1.9
Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究解释了导致地方经济精英（LEEs）将自然灾害脆弱性（VNH）视为优先公共问题的因素。根据 57 个拉丁美洲和加勒比地区（LAC）城市的信息，估算了一个最优比例回归模型。估算包括与风险暴露、社会条件和灾害管理工具相关的变量。李先生们之所以将 VNH 视为一个优先问题，其核心因素是自然风险的实际暴露程度和当地贫困人口的高比例。他们似乎认为，加剧环境脆弱性的社会贫困应与公平问题分开处理；随着城市规模的增大， 他们似乎将 VNH 问题相对化，认为 VNH 并不影响整个城市；政府的自然灾害管理工具并没有对 他们对环境脆弱性的认识产生任何影响。这些研究结果有助于我们了解拉丁美洲和加勒比地区应急管理工具的低集体有效性。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
Environmental vulnerability as a public priority: The view of local economic elites
The study explains the factors leading local economic elites (LEEs) to consider vulnerability to natural hazards (VNH) a priority public problem. An Optimal Scaling Regression model was estimated based on information from 57 Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) cities. The estimation included variables related to risk exposure, social conditions, and disaster management instruments. The central factors that explain why LEEs consider VNH a priority problem are the level of real exposure to natural risks and a high proportion of the local population living in poverty. LEEs seem to assume that the social deprivations that accentuate environmental vulnerability should be treated independently of the problem of equity; LEEs seem to relativize the VNH problem as the size of the city increases by assuming that VNH does not affect the whole city; government instruments for the management of natural hazards do not exert any influence on the perception of LEEs on environmental vulnerability. The findings help us to understand the low collective effectiveness of emergency management instruments in the LAC region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍：
Scholarship on risk, hazards, and crises (emergencies, disasters, or public policy/organizational crises) has developed into mature and distinct fields of inquiry. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy (RHCPP) addresses the governance implications of the important questions raised for the respective fields. The relationships between risk, hazards, and crisis raise fundamental questions with broad social science and policy implications. During unstable situations of acute or chronic danger and substantial uncertainty (i.e. a crisis), important and deeply rooted societal institutions, norms, and values come into play. The purpose of RHCPP is to provide a forum for research and commentary that examines societies’ understanding of and measures to address risk,hazards, and crises, how public policies do and should address these concerns, and to what effect. The journal is explicitly designed to encourage a broad range of perspectives by integrating work from a variety of disciplines. The journal will look at social science theory and policy design across the spectrum of risks and crises — including natural and technological hazards, public health crises, terrorism, and societal and environmental disasters. Papers will analyze the ways societies deal with both unpredictable and predictable events as public policy questions, which include topics such as crisis governance, loss and liability, emergency response, agenda setting, and the social and cultural contexts in which hazards, risks and crises are perceived and defined. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy invites dialogue and is open to new approaches. We seek scholarly work that combines academic quality with practical relevance. We especially welcome authors writing on the governance of risk and crises to submit their manuscripts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
