测序与扩增在甘蔗(蔗属植物)等位基因剂量估算中的比较

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Hugo Jaimes, Alejandra Londoño, Carolina Saavedra-Diaz, Jhon Henry Trujillo-Montenegro, Jershon López-Gerena, John J. Riascos, Fernando S. Aguilar
{"title":"测序与扩增在甘蔗(蔗属植物)等位基因剂量估算中的比较","authors":"Hugo Jaimes,&nbsp;Alejandra Londoño,&nbsp;Carolina Saavedra-Diaz,&nbsp;Jhon Henry Trujillo-Montenegro,&nbsp;Jershon López-Gerena,&nbsp;John J. Riascos,&nbsp;Fernando S. Aguilar","doi":"10.1002/aps3.11574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Detecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a cost-effective way is fundamental in any plant breeding pipeline. Here, we compare three genotyping techniques for their ability to reproduce the allele dosage of SNPs of interest in sugarcane (<i>Saccharum</i> spp.).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To identify a reproducible technique to estimate allele dosage for the validation of SNP markers, the correlation between Flex-Seq, kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP), and genotyping-by-sequencing and restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (GBS+RADseq) was determined for a set of 76 SNPs. To find alternative methodologies for allele dosage estimation, the KASP and Flex-Seq techniques were compared for the same set of SNPs. For the three techniques, a population of 53 genotypes from the diverse sugarcane panel of the Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar (Cenicaña), Colombia, was selected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average Pearson correlation coefficients between GBS+RADseq and Flex-Seq, GBS+RADseq and KASP, and Flex-Seq and KASP were 0.62 ± 0.27, 0.38 ± 0.27, and 0.38 ± 0.30, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Flex-Seq reproduced the allele dosages determined using GBS+RADseq with good levels of precision because of its depth of sequencing and ability to target specific positions in the genome. Additionally, Flex-Seq outperformed KASP by allowing the conversion of a higher number of SNPs and a more accurate estimation of the allele dosage. Flex-Seq has therefore become the genotyping methodology of choice for marker validation at Cenicaña.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8022,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Plant Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequencing vs. amplification for the estimation of allele dosages in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Jaimes,&nbsp;Alejandra Londoño,&nbsp;Carolina Saavedra-Diaz,&nbsp;Jhon Henry Trujillo-Montenegro,&nbsp;Jershon López-Gerena,&nbsp;John J. Riascos,&nbsp;Fernando S. Aguilar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aps3.11574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>Detecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a cost-effective way is fundamental in any plant breeding pipeline. Here, we compare three genotyping techniques for their ability to reproduce the allele dosage of SNPs of interest in sugarcane (<i>Saccharum</i> spp.).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>To identify a reproducible technique to estimate allele dosage for the validation of SNP markers, the correlation between Flex-Seq, kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP), and genotyping-by-sequencing and restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (GBS+RADseq) was determined for a set of 76 SNPs. To find alternative methodologies for allele dosage estimation, the KASP and Flex-Seq techniques were compared for the same set of SNPs. For the three techniques, a population of 53 genotypes from the diverse sugarcane panel of the Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar (Cenicaña), Colombia, was selected.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The average Pearson correlation coefficients between GBS+RADseq and Flex-Seq, GBS+RADseq and KASP, and Flex-Seq and KASP were 0.62 ± 0.27, 0.38 ± 0.27, and 0.38 ± 0.30, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Flex-Seq reproduced the allele dosages determined using GBS+RADseq with good levels of precision because of its depth of sequencing and ability to target specific positions in the genome. Additionally, Flex-Seq outperformed KASP by allowing the conversion of a higher number of SNPs and a more accurate estimation of the allele dosage. Flex-Seq has therefore become the genotyping methodology of choice for marker validation at Cenicaña.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applications in Plant Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11574\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applications in Plant Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11574\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前提以经济有效的方式检测单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)是任何植物育种工作的基础。为了确定一种可重复的技术来估算等位基因剂量,以便对 SNP 标记进行验证,我们对一组 76 个 SNP 进行了 Flex-Seq、竞争性等位基因特异性 PCR(KASP)以及基因分型测序和限制性位点相关 DNA 测序(GBS+RADseq)之间的相关性测定。为了找到估算等位基因剂量的替代方法,对 KASP 和 Flex-Seq 技术进行了比较。结果 GBS+RADseq 与 Flex-Seq、GBS+RADseq 与 KASP、Flex-Seq 与 KASP 之间的平均皮尔逊相关系数分别为 0.讨论由于 Flex-Seq 的测序深度和针对基因组特定位置的能力,它以较高的精度重现了使用 GBS+RADseq 测定的等位基因剂量。此外,Flex-Seq 还能转换更多的 SNPs 并更准确地估算等位基因剂量,因此其性能优于 KASP。因此,Flex-Seq 已成为 Cenicaña 验证标记的首选基因分型方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sequencing vs. amplification for the estimation of allele dosages in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)

Sequencing vs. amplification for the estimation of allele dosages in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)

Premise

Detecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a cost-effective way is fundamental in any plant breeding pipeline. Here, we compare three genotyping techniques for their ability to reproduce the allele dosage of SNPs of interest in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.).

Methods

To identify a reproducible technique to estimate allele dosage for the validation of SNP markers, the correlation between Flex-Seq, kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP), and genotyping-by-sequencing and restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (GBS+RADseq) was determined for a set of 76 SNPs. To find alternative methodologies for allele dosage estimation, the KASP and Flex-Seq techniques were compared for the same set of SNPs. For the three techniques, a population of 53 genotypes from the diverse sugarcane panel of the Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar (Cenicaña), Colombia, was selected.

Results

The average Pearson correlation coefficients between GBS+RADseq and Flex-Seq, GBS+RADseq and KASP, and Flex-Seq and KASP were 0.62 ± 0.27, 0.38 ± 0.27, and 0.38 ± 0.30, respectively.

Discussion

Flex-Seq reproduced the allele dosages determined using GBS+RADseq with good levels of precision because of its depth of sequencing and ability to target specific positions in the genome. Additionally, Flex-Seq outperformed KASP by allowing the conversion of a higher number of SNPs and a more accurate estimation of the allele dosage. Flex-Seq has therefore become the genotyping methodology of choice for marker validation at Cenicaña.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) is a monthly, peer-reviewed, open access journal promoting the rapid dissemination of newly developed, innovative tools and protocols in all areas of the plant sciences, including genetics, structure, function, development, evolution, systematics, and ecology. Given the rapid progress today in technology and its application in the plant sciences, the goal of APPS is to foster communication within the plant science community to advance scientific research. APPS is a publication of the Botanical Society of America, originating in 2009 as the American Journal of Botany''s online-only section, AJB Primer Notes & Protocols in the Plant Sciences. APPS publishes the following types of articles: (1) Protocol Notes describe new methods and technological advancements; (2) Genomic Resources Articles characterize the development and demonstrate the usefulness of newly developed genomic resources, including transcriptomes; (3) Software Notes detail new software applications; (4) Application Articles illustrate the application of a new protocol, method, or software application within the context of a larger study; (5) Review Articles evaluate available techniques, methods, or protocols; (6) Primer Notes report novel genetic markers with evidence of wide applicability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信