定量预测临床实践中 CYP3A 诱导的药物间相互作用

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"定量预测临床实践中 CYP3A 诱导的药物间相互作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dmpk.2024.101010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There have been no reports on the quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated decreases in AUC and <em>C</em><sub>max</sub> for drug candidates identified as a “victims” of CYP3A induction. Our previous study separately evaluated the fold-induction of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A by known inducers using clinical induction data and revealed that we were able to quantitatively predict the AUC ratio (AUCR) of a few CYP3A substrates in the presence and absence of CYP3A inducers. In the present study, we investigate the predictability of AUCR and also <em>C</em><sub>max</sub> ratio (C<sub>max</sub>R) in additional 54 clinical studies. The fraction metabolized by CYP3A (<em>f</em><sub>m</sub>), the intestinal bioavailability (<em>F</em><sub>g</sub>), and the hepatic intrinsic clearance (<em>CL</em><sub>int</sub>) of substrates were determined by the in vitro experiments as well as clinical data used for calculating AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R. The result showed that 65–69% and 65–67% of predictions were within 2-fold of observed AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R, respectively. A simulation using multiple parameter combinations suggested that the variability of <em>f</em><sub>m</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>g</sub> within a certain range might have a minimal impact on the calculation output. These findings suggest that clinical AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R of CYP3A substrates can be quantitatively predicted from the preclinical stage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11298,"journal":{"name":"Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347436724000168/pdfft?md5=05af9e2101d932059de43ff8740db672&pid=1-s2.0-S1347436724000168-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated drug-drug interactions in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dmpk.2024.101010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There have been no reports on the quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated decreases in AUC and <em>C</em><sub>max</sub> for drug candidates identified as a “victims” of CYP3A induction. Our previous study separately evaluated the fold-induction of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A by known inducers using clinical induction data and revealed that we were able to quantitatively predict the AUC ratio (AUCR) of a few CYP3A substrates in the presence and absence of CYP3A inducers. In the present study, we investigate the predictability of AUCR and also <em>C</em><sub>max</sub> ratio (C<sub>max</sub>R) in additional 54 clinical studies. The fraction metabolized by CYP3A (<em>f</em><sub>m</sub>), the intestinal bioavailability (<em>F</em><sub>g</sub>), and the hepatic intrinsic clearance (<em>CL</em><sub>int</sub>) of substrates were determined by the in vitro experiments as well as clinical data used for calculating AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R. The result showed that 65–69% and 65–67% of predictions were within 2-fold of observed AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R, respectively. A simulation using multiple parameter combinations suggested that the variability of <em>f</em><sub>m</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>g</sub> within a certain range might have a minimal impact on the calculation output. These findings suggest that clinical AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R of CYP3A substrates can be quantitatively predicted from the preclinical stage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347436724000168/pdfft?md5=05af9e2101d932059de43ff8740db672&pid=1-s2.0-S1347436724000168-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347436724000168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347436724000168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前还没有关于定量预测 CYP3A 诱导介导的 AUC 下降以及被确定为 CYP3A 诱导 "受害者 "的候选药物的报道。我们之前的研究利用临床诱导数据分别评估了已知诱导剂对肝脏和肠道 CYP3A 的诱导倍数,结果表明我们能够定量预测几种 CYP3A 底物在有 CYP3A 诱导剂和没有 CYP3A 诱导剂时的比值(AUCR)。在本研究中,我们在另外 54 项临床研究中调查了 AUCR 和比值比 (CR) 的可预测性。通过体外实验以及用于计算 AUCR 和 CR 的临床数据,确定了底物经 CYP3A 代谢的部分()、肠道生物利用度()和肝脏固有清除率(CL)。结果显示,分别有 65-69% 和 65-67% 的预测值与观察到的 AUCR 和 CR 相差在 2 倍以内。使用多种参数组合进行的模拟表明,一定范围内的变异性对计算结果的影响可能微乎其微。这些发现表明,CYP3A 底物的临床 AUCR 和 CR 可以从临床前阶段进行定量预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated drug-drug interactions in clinical practice

There have been no reports on the quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated decreases in AUC and Cmax for drug candidates identified as a “victims” of CYP3A induction. Our previous study separately evaluated the fold-induction of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A by known inducers using clinical induction data and revealed that we were able to quantitatively predict the AUC ratio (AUCR) of a few CYP3A substrates in the presence and absence of CYP3A inducers. In the present study, we investigate the predictability of AUCR and also Cmax ratio (CmaxR) in additional 54 clinical studies. The fraction metabolized by CYP3A (fm), the intestinal bioavailability (Fg), and the hepatic intrinsic clearance (CLint) of substrates were determined by the in vitro experiments as well as clinical data used for calculating AUCR and CmaxR. The result showed that 65–69% and 65–67% of predictions were within 2-fold of observed AUCR and CmaxR, respectively. A simulation using multiple parameter combinations suggested that the variability of fm and Fg within a certain range might have a minimal impact on the calculation output. These findings suggest that clinical AUCR and CmaxR of CYP3A substrates can be quantitatively predicted from the preclinical stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: DMPK publishes original and innovative scientific papers that address topics broadly related to xenobiotics. The term xenobiotic includes medicinal as well as environmental and agricultural chemicals and macromolecules. The journal is organized into sections as follows: - Drug metabolism / Biotransformation - Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics - Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics - Drug-drug interaction / Drug-food interaction - Mechanism of drug absorption and disposition (including transporter) - Drug delivery system - Clinical pharmacy and pharmacology - Analytical method - Factors affecting drug metabolism and transport - Expression of genes for drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters - Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics - Pharmacoepidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信