对外直接投资对母国全要素生产率的反向技术溢出效应:投资模式是否重要?

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ayesha Ashraf , Federico Carril-Caccia , Nadia Doytch
{"title":"对外直接投资对母国全要素生产率的反向技术溢出效应:投资模式是否重要?","authors":"Ayesha Ashraf ,&nbsp;Federico Carril-Caccia ,&nbsp;Nadia Doytch","doi":"10.1016/j.bir.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine the effect of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on total factor productivity (TFP) of home (source of FDI) countries in a global sample of 85 economies, distinguishing between outward greenfield FDI (OGFDI) and outward cross-border merger and acquisition (M&amp;A) purchases. The goal of the study is to test for <em>reverse technological spillovers</em> to the FDI source country. The hypothesis is that OGFDI and M&amp;As have different capabilities of carrying out <em>reverse technological spillovers,</em> which would affect the TFP of home countries differently. We apply a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) to deal with possible endogeneity and find the following results. <em>First</em>, total OFDI has no effect on the home country's TFP. <em>Second</em>, disentangling OFDI by mode of investment reveals both positive and negative <em>reverse spillovers</em> from FDI to TFP. While OGFDI produces <em>negative reverse spillovers</em> on the TFP of an MNE's home country due to displacement of production and reduced competition at home, M&amp;A purchases produce <em>positive reverse spillovers</em> on the TFP of an MNE's home country due to their potential to acquire high-value knowledge assets. <em>Third</em>, home countries' human capital development positively moderates the impact of OGFDI and M&amp;A purchases on TFP, while trade openness positively moderates only the M&amp;A impact on TFP. Our findings imply that policies that seek to promote OFDI can be beneficial once countries have reached a certain degree of human capital development and participation in international trade.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46690,"journal":{"name":"Borsa Istanbul Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000474/pdfft?md5=340f0caa0234fa4692020fe0b2dff1cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000474-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reverse technological spillovers from outward FDI on home countries’ total factor productivity: Does the mode of investment matter?\",\"authors\":\"Ayesha Ashraf ,&nbsp;Federico Carril-Caccia ,&nbsp;Nadia Doytch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bir.2024.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We examine the effect of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on total factor productivity (TFP) of home (source of FDI) countries in a global sample of 85 economies, distinguishing between outward greenfield FDI (OGFDI) and outward cross-border merger and acquisition (M&amp;A) purchases. The goal of the study is to test for <em>reverse technological spillovers</em> to the FDI source country. The hypothesis is that OGFDI and M&amp;As have different capabilities of carrying out <em>reverse technological spillovers,</em> which would affect the TFP of home countries differently. We apply a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) to deal with possible endogeneity and find the following results. <em>First</em>, total OFDI has no effect on the home country's TFP. <em>Second</em>, disentangling OFDI by mode of investment reveals both positive and negative <em>reverse spillovers</em> from FDI to TFP. While OGFDI produces <em>negative reverse spillovers</em> on the TFP of an MNE's home country due to displacement of production and reduced competition at home, M&amp;A purchases produce <em>positive reverse spillovers</em> on the TFP of an MNE's home country due to their potential to acquire high-value knowledge assets. <em>Third</em>, home countries' human capital development positively moderates the impact of OGFDI and M&amp;A purchases on TFP, while trade openness positively moderates only the M&amp;A impact on TFP. Our findings imply that policies that seek to promote OFDI can be beneficial once countries have reached a certain degree of human capital development and participation in international trade.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000474/pdfft?md5=340f0caa0234fa4692020fe0b2dff1cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000474-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borsa Istanbul Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们以全球 85 个经济体为样本,研究了对外直接投资(OFDI)对母国(FDI 来源国)全要素生产率(TFP)的影响,并区分了对外绿地直接投资(OGFDI)和对外跨境并购(M&A)。研究的目的是对外国直接投资来源国进行检验。我们的假设是,OGFDI 和并购具有不同的执行能力,会对母国的全要素生产率产生不同的影响。我们采用两步系统广义矩法(GMM)来处理可能存在的内生性,结果如下。对外直接投资总额对母国的全要素生产率没有影响。将对外直接投资与投资模式分离后,发现外国直接投资对全要素生产率既有正向影响,也有负向影响。外商直接投资对跨国企业母国的全要素生产率产生影响的原因是生产转移和母国竞争的减少,而并购对跨国企业母国的全要素生产率产生影响的原因是并购有可能获得高价值的知识资产。此外,母国的人力资本发展水平正向调节了对外直接投资和并购对全要素生产率的影响,而贸易开放度只正向调节了并购对全要素生产率的影响。我们的研究结果表明,一旦国家的人力资本发展和国际贸易参与度达到一定程度,旨在促进对外直接投资的政策就会带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reverse technological spillovers from outward FDI on home countries’ total factor productivity: Does the mode of investment matter?

We examine the effect of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on total factor productivity (TFP) of home (source of FDI) countries in a global sample of 85 economies, distinguishing between outward greenfield FDI (OGFDI) and outward cross-border merger and acquisition (M&A) purchases. The goal of the study is to test for reverse technological spillovers to the FDI source country. The hypothesis is that OGFDI and M&As have different capabilities of carrying out reverse technological spillovers, which would affect the TFP of home countries differently. We apply a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) to deal with possible endogeneity and find the following results. First, total OFDI has no effect on the home country's TFP. Second, disentangling OFDI by mode of investment reveals both positive and negative reverse spillovers from FDI to TFP. While OGFDI produces negative reverse spillovers on the TFP of an MNE's home country due to displacement of production and reduced competition at home, M&A purchases produce positive reverse spillovers on the TFP of an MNE's home country due to their potential to acquire high-value knowledge assets. Third, home countries' human capital development positively moderates the impact of OGFDI and M&A purchases on TFP, while trade openness positively moderates only the M&A impact on TFP. Our findings imply that policies that seek to promote OFDI can be beneficial once countries have reached a certain degree of human capital development and participation in international trade.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
130
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Borsa İstanbul Anonim Sirketi. Borsa İstanbul Review provides a scholarly platform for empirical financial studies including but not limited to financial markets and institutions, financial economics, investor behavior, financial centers and market structures, corporate finance, recent economic and financial trends. Micro and macro data applications and comparative studies are welcome. Country coverage includes advanced, emerging and developing economies. In particular, we would like to publish empirical papers with significant policy implications and encourage submissions in the following areas: Research Topics: • Investments and Portfolio Management • Behavioral Finance • Financial Markets and Institutions • Market Microstructure • Islamic Finance • Financial Risk Management • Valuation • Capital Markets Governance • Financial Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信