正念应用程序对心理变化过程的影响:系统综述

Natalia Macrynikola, Zareen Mir, Tishmattie Gopal, Erica Rodriguez, Sunnie Li, Milann Cox, Gloria Yeh, John Torous
{"title":"正念应用程序对心理变化过程的影响:系统综述","authors":"Natalia Macrynikola, Zareen Mir, Tishmattie Gopal, Erica Rodriguez, Sunnie Li, Milann Cox, Gloria Yeh, John Torous","doi":"10.1038/s44184-023-00048-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy for various psychological conditions, and smartphone apps that facilitate mindfulness practice can enhance the reach and impact of MBIs. The goal of this review was to summarize the published evidence on the impact of mindfulness apps on the psychological processes known to mediate transdiagnostic symptom reduction after mindfulness practice. A literature search from January 1, 1993, to August 7, 2023 was conducted on three databases, and 28 randomized controlled trials involving 5963 adults were included. Across these 28 studies, 67 outcome comparisons were made between a mindfulness app group and a control group. Between-group effects tended to favor the mindfulness app group over the control group in three psychological process domains: repetitive negative thinking, attention regulation, and decentering/defusion. Findings were mixed in other domains (i.e., awareness, nonreactivity, non-judgment, positive affect, and acceptance). The range of populations examined, methodological concerns across studies, and problems with sustained app engagement likely contributed to mixed findings. However, effect sizes tended to be moderate to large when effects were found, and gains tended to persist at follow-up assessments two to six months later. More research is needed to better understand the impact of these apps on psychological processes of change. Clinicians interested in integrating apps into care should consider app-related factors beyond evidence of a clinical foundation and use app databases to identify suitable apps for their patients, as highlighted at the end of this review.","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00048-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of mindfulness apps on psychological processes of change: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Macrynikola, Zareen Mir, Tishmattie Gopal, Erica Rodriguez, Sunnie Li, Milann Cox, Gloria Yeh, John Torous\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44184-023-00048-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy for various psychological conditions, and smartphone apps that facilitate mindfulness practice can enhance the reach and impact of MBIs. The goal of this review was to summarize the published evidence on the impact of mindfulness apps on the psychological processes known to mediate transdiagnostic symptom reduction after mindfulness practice. A literature search from January 1, 1993, to August 7, 2023 was conducted on three databases, and 28 randomized controlled trials involving 5963 adults were included. Across these 28 studies, 67 outcome comparisons were made between a mindfulness app group and a control group. Between-group effects tended to favor the mindfulness app group over the control group in three psychological process domains: repetitive negative thinking, attention regulation, and decentering/defusion. Findings were mixed in other domains (i.e., awareness, nonreactivity, non-judgment, positive affect, and acceptance). The range of populations examined, methodological concerns across studies, and problems with sustained app engagement likely contributed to mixed findings. However, effect sizes tended to be moderate to large when effects were found, and gains tended to persist at follow-up assessments two to six months later. More research is needed to better understand the impact of these apps on psychological processes of change. Clinicians interested in integrating apps into care should consider app-related factors beyond evidence of a clinical foundation and use app databases to identify suitable apps for their patients, as highlighted at the end of this review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00048-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00048-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00048-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正念干预(MBIs)已证明对各种心理疾病有疗效,而促进正念练习的智能手机应用程序可以提高正念干预的覆盖面和影响力。本综述旨在总结已发表的证据,说明正念应用程序对正念练习后已知介导跨诊断症状减轻的心理过程的影响。我们在三个数据库中检索了 1993 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 7 日期间的文献,共纳入 28 项随机对照试验,涉及 5963 名成人。在这 28 项研究中,对正念应用程序组和对照组进行了 67 次结果比较。在重复性负面思维、注意力调节和去中心化/defusion 这三个心理过程领域,正念应用程序组的组间效应往往优于对照组。在其他领域(即意识、非反应、非判断、积极情绪和接受)的研究结果不一。所研究人群的范围、不同研究的方法问题以及持续使用应用程序的问题可能是导致研究结果参差不齐的原因。不过,当发现效果时,效果大小往往为中等到较大,并且在两到六个月后的后续评估中,效果往往会持续。要想更好地了解这些应用程序对心理变化过程的影响,还需要进行更多的研究。正如本综述末尾所强调的,有兴趣将应用程序整合到护理中的临床医生应考虑与应用程序相关的因素,而不仅仅是临床基础的证据,并使用应用程序数据库为患者识别合适的应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of mindfulness apps on psychological processes of change: a systematic review

The impact of mindfulness apps on psychological processes of change: a systematic review
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy for various psychological conditions, and smartphone apps that facilitate mindfulness practice can enhance the reach and impact of MBIs. The goal of this review was to summarize the published evidence on the impact of mindfulness apps on the psychological processes known to mediate transdiagnostic symptom reduction after mindfulness practice. A literature search from January 1, 1993, to August 7, 2023 was conducted on three databases, and 28 randomized controlled trials involving 5963 adults were included. Across these 28 studies, 67 outcome comparisons were made between a mindfulness app group and a control group. Between-group effects tended to favor the mindfulness app group over the control group in three psychological process domains: repetitive negative thinking, attention regulation, and decentering/defusion. Findings were mixed in other domains (i.e., awareness, nonreactivity, non-judgment, positive affect, and acceptance). The range of populations examined, methodological concerns across studies, and problems with sustained app engagement likely contributed to mixed findings. However, effect sizes tended to be moderate to large when effects were found, and gains tended to persist at follow-up assessments two to six months later. More research is needed to better understand the impact of these apps on psychological processes of change. Clinicians interested in integrating apps into care should consider app-related factors beyond evidence of a clinical foundation and use app databases to identify suitable apps for their patients, as highlighted at the end of this review.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信