Lara S Chapman, Heidi J Siddle, Stefan Serban, Kulveer Mankia, Christopher M Rooney, Zhain Mustufvi, Simon Pini, Karen Vinall-Collier
{"title":"我的风险到底有多大?\":对类风湿关节炎高危人群预防干预措施的定性研究。","authors":"Lara S Chapman, Heidi J Siddle, Stefan Serban, Kulveer Mankia, Christopher M Rooney, Zhain Mustufvi, Simon Pini, Karen Vinall-Collier","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intervention in the pre-arthritis phase of RA could prevent or delay the onset of disease. The primary aim of this study was to explore perspectives of being at risk and potential preventive interventions among individuals at risk of developing RA and to identify factors influencing their engagement with prevention. A secondary aim, established during the analytical process, was to understand and compare different approaches to health-related behaviours related to prevention of RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anti-CCP-positive (CCP<sup>+</sup>) at-risk individuals with musculoskeletal symptoms but no synovitis participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, followed by a secondary ideal-type analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen CCP<sup>+</sup> at-risk individuals (10 women; age range 35-70 years) participated. Three overarching themes were identified: being CCP<sup>+</sup> at risk; aiming to prevent RA; and influencers of engagement. Participants described distress related to symptoms and uncertainty about disease progression. Many participants had concerns about medication side effects. In contrast, most participants expressed willingness to make lifestyle changes with the aim of preventing RA. Engagement with preventive measures was influenced by symptom severity, personal risk level, co-morbidities, experiences of taking other medications/supplements, knowledge of RA, risk factors and medications, and perceived effort. Three types of participants were identified from the data: proactive preventers, change considerers and fearful avoiders. Overall orientation to health behaviours also impacted the attitude towards preventing RA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings could inform recruitment and retention in RA prevention research and promote uptake of preventive interventions in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 2","pages":"rkae023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10939459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'What is my risk really?': a qualitative exploration of preventive interventions among individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Lara S Chapman, Heidi J Siddle, Stefan Serban, Kulveer Mankia, Christopher M Rooney, Zhain Mustufvi, Simon Pini, Karen Vinall-Collier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkae023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intervention in the pre-arthritis phase of RA could prevent or delay the onset of disease. The primary aim of this study was to explore perspectives of being at risk and potential preventive interventions among individuals at risk of developing RA and to identify factors influencing their engagement with prevention. A secondary aim, established during the analytical process, was to understand and compare different approaches to health-related behaviours related to prevention of RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anti-CCP-positive (CCP<sup>+</sup>) at-risk individuals with musculoskeletal symptoms but no synovitis participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, followed by a secondary ideal-type analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen CCP<sup>+</sup> at-risk individuals (10 women; age range 35-70 years) participated. Three overarching themes were identified: being CCP<sup>+</sup> at risk; aiming to prevent RA; and influencers of engagement. Participants described distress related to symptoms and uncertainty about disease progression. Many participants had concerns about medication side effects. In contrast, most participants expressed willingness to make lifestyle changes with the aim of preventing RA. Engagement with preventive measures was influenced by symptom severity, personal risk level, co-morbidities, experiences of taking other medications/supplements, knowledge of RA, risk factors and medications, and perceived effort. Three types of participants were identified from the data: proactive preventers, change considerers and fearful avoiders. Overall orientation to health behaviours also impacted the attitude towards preventing RA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings could inform recruitment and retention in RA prevention research and promote uptake of preventive interventions in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"rkae023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10939459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:在 RA 的关节炎前期进行干预可预防或推迟疾病的发生。本研究的主要目的是探讨高危人群对自身风险和潜在预防干预措施的看法,并确定影响他们参与预防的因素。在分析过程中确定的次要目的是了解和比较与预防 RA 有关的健康相关行为的不同方法:抗CCP阳性(CCP+)、有肌肉骨骼症状但无滑膜炎的高危人群参加了半结构化访谈。采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析,然后进行二次理想型分析:19 名 CCP+ 高危人群(10 名女性;年龄在 35-70 岁之间)参加了访谈。确定了三大主题:CCP+ 高危人群;旨在预防 RA;参与的影响因素。参与者描述了与症状相关的痛苦以及对疾病进展的不确定性。许多参与者担心药物的副作用。相比之下,大多数参与者表示愿意改变生活方式,以预防 RA。参与预防措施的程度受症状严重程度、个人风险水平、并发症、服用其他药物/补充剂的经历、对RA的了解、风险因素和药物,以及感知到的努力程度的影响。从数据中发现了三种类型的参与者:主动预防者、考虑改变者和恐惧逃避者。对健康行为的整体定位也会影响对预防RA的态度:研究结果可为RA预防研究的招募和保留提供信息,并促进临床实践中预防干预措施的采用。
'What is my risk really?': a qualitative exploration of preventive interventions among individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis.
Objectives: Intervention in the pre-arthritis phase of RA could prevent or delay the onset of disease. The primary aim of this study was to explore perspectives of being at risk and potential preventive interventions among individuals at risk of developing RA and to identify factors influencing their engagement with prevention. A secondary aim, established during the analytical process, was to understand and compare different approaches to health-related behaviours related to prevention of RA.
Methods: Anti-CCP-positive (CCP+) at-risk individuals with musculoskeletal symptoms but no synovitis participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, followed by a secondary ideal-type analysis.
Results: Nineteen CCP+ at-risk individuals (10 women; age range 35-70 years) participated. Three overarching themes were identified: being CCP+ at risk; aiming to prevent RA; and influencers of engagement. Participants described distress related to symptoms and uncertainty about disease progression. Many participants had concerns about medication side effects. In contrast, most participants expressed willingness to make lifestyle changes with the aim of preventing RA. Engagement with preventive measures was influenced by symptom severity, personal risk level, co-morbidities, experiences of taking other medications/supplements, knowledge of RA, risk factors and medications, and perceived effort. Three types of participants were identified from the data: proactive preventers, change considerers and fearful avoiders. Overall orientation to health behaviours also impacted the attitude towards preventing RA.
Conclusion: Findings could inform recruitment and retention in RA prevention research and promote uptake of preventive interventions in clinical practice.